Single Portion Packaging and the Use of User Test Protocols to Determine Patient Accessibility

References

• Elia M, British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. The cost of malnutrition in England and potential cost savings from nutritional interventions, BAPEN; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Malnutrition among Older People in the Community. Policy Recommendations for Change. London: BAPEN, The European Nutrition for Health Alliance, International Longevity Centre, Associate Parliamentary Food and Health Forum; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schenker S. Undernutrition in the UK. Nutr Bulletin. 2003;28(1):87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus C, Hamlyn J. Prevalence and documentation of malnutrition in hospitals. A case study in a large private hospital setting. Nutr Diet. 2005;62(1):41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Banks M, Ash M, Bauer S, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in adults in Queensland public hospitals and residential aged care facilities. Nutr Diet. 2007;64(3):172–178. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00179.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivanti A, Banks M, Aliakbari J, et al. Meal and food preferences of nutritionally at-risk inpatients admitted to two Australian tertiary teaching hospitals. Nutr Diet. 2008;65(1):36–40. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00178.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews R, Bartlett L, Hall J. Nutrition Matters. Patient Centred Nutrition Project Diagnostic Report. Northern Sydney Central Coast NSW Health. Sydney: NSW Government Health Department; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Walton K, Williams P, Tapsell L. What do stakeholders consider the key issues affecting the quality of foodservice provision for long-stay patients? J Food Serv. 2006;17(5–6):212–225. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4506.2006.00039.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang MF. Is there adequate feeding assistance for the hospitalised elderly who are unable to feed themselves? Nutr Diet. 2008;65(3):222–228. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2008.00249.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AF, Walton K, Chevis JS, et al. Accessing packaged food and beverages in hospital. Exploring experiences of patients and staff. Appetite. 2013;60:231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo LC, Chang JH, Lin CF, et al. Jar- opening challenges. Part 2: estimating the force-generating capacity of thumb muscles in healthy young adults during jar-opening tasks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009;223:577. doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoxall A, Kamat SR, Langley J, et al. Squeezability. Part 2: getting stuff out of a bottle. Proc Inst Mech Eng C. 2010;224(6):1261–1271. doi:10.1243/09544062JMES1772.
   Google Scholar
• Rowson J, Yoxall A. Hold, grasp, clutch or grab: consumer grip choices during food container opening. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(5):627–633. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canty LA, Lewis R, Yoxall A. Investigating openability of rigid plastic containers with peelable lids: the link between human strength and grip and opening forces. Proc Inst Mech Eng C. 2013;227(5):1056–1068. doi:10.1177/0954406212457729.
   Google Scholar
• De La Fuente J, Gustafson S, Twomey C, et al. An affordance-based methodology for package design. Packag Technol Sci. 2015;28(2):157–171. doi:10.1002/pts.2087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bix L, De La Fuente J, Pimple KD, et al. Is the test of senior friendly/child resistant packaging ethical? Health Expectations. 2009;12(4):430–437. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00534.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar RP, Becker MW, Bello NM, et al. Quantifying age-related differences in information processing behaviors when viewing prescription drug labels. PLOS One. 2012;7(6):e38819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC UK. 2004. Wrap rage. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3456645.stm. Accessed May 6, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• DD CEN/TS 15945:2011 Packaging. Ease of opening. Criteria and test methods for evaluating consumer packaging; CEN 15945:2011 London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation. BS EN ISO17480 packaging -accessible design -ease of opening. ISO 17480: 2018. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation BS EN ISO 8317, child-resistant packaging — requirements and testing procedures for reclosable packages. ISO 8317: 2003. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation. BS EN 862, Packaging — child-resistant packaging — requirements and testing procedures for non-reclosable packages for non-pharmaceutical products. ISO 862: 2016. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation. BS EN 14375, child-resistant non-reclosable packaging for pharmaceutical products — requirements and testing. ISO 14375: 2016. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation. BS ISO 20282-1, ease of operation of everyday products — part 1: design requirements for context of use and user characteristics. ISO 20282-1: 2006. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation. PD ISO/TS 20282-2, ease of operation of everyday products — part 2: test method for walk-up-and-use products. ISO 20282-2: 2013. London: BSI.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton NA. Hierarchal task analysis: development, applications, and extensions. Appl Ergon. 2006;37:55–79. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell A, Walton KA, Yoxall A. ‘Fit For purpose? Usability of hospital food and beverage packs.’ Design4Heath conference; December 4–7, 2017; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yoxall A, Best J, Rodriguez-Falcon EM, et al. As you like it: understanding the relationship between packing design and accessibility, Packaging Technology and Science ( forthcoming).
   Google Scholar