Linking Pacioli's double-entry bookkeeping, algebra, and art: accounting history or idle speculation?

References

• Barker, R. 2010.“On the Definitions of Income, Expenses and Profit in IFRS.”Accounting in Europe 7 (2): 147–158. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2010.511892
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, R. A. 1993. “Double-entry Book-Keeping and the Birth of Capitalism: Accounting for the Commercial Revolution in Northern Italy.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 4 (2): 113–140. doi: 10.1006/cpac.1993.1008
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, R. A. 2006. “Accounting and Control of the LabourProcess.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Special Issue on Accounting and the Labour Process 17 (5): 551–598. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, R. A. 2013. “Americanism and Financial Accounting Theory. Part 3: Adam Smith, the Rise and Fall of Socialism, and Irving Fisher's Theory of Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24 (7/8): 572–615. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, G., F. Clarke, and F. Capalbo 2016. “Pacioli's double entry – part of an intellectual and social movement.” Accounting History Review 26 (1): 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., G. Dean, and F. Clarke. 2009. “Merchants' Accounts, Performance Assessment and Decision Making in Mercantilist Britain. ”Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (5): 551–570. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. J. 2014. “‘Different from What has Hitherto Appeared on this Subject’: John Clark, Writing Master and Accomptant, 1738.” Abacus 50 (2): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board. December 1984. “ Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises.” Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5. Stamford, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. (1906) 1965. The Nature of Capital and Income. Reprint, New York: Augustus Kelly.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, H. R. 1909. Modern Accounting: Its Principles and Some of Its Problems. London: D. Appleton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskin, K. W. and R. H. Macve. 1986. “Accounting and the Examination: A Genealogy of Disciplinary Power.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 11 (2): 105–136. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(86)90027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, E. L. 1970. A Dictionary for Accountants. 4th ed. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. 1973. “The Accounting Entity.” Abacus 9 (2): 116–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1973.tb00181.x
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. 2012. “On the Definitions of Income and Revenue in IFRS.” Accounting in Europe 9 (1): 85–94. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.664395
   Google Scholar
• Paton, W. A. 1917. “Theory of the Double-Entry System.” Journal of Accountancy 23 (1): 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, W. A. 1922. Accounting Theory with Special Reference to the Corporate Enterprise. New York: Ronald Press. Reprinted 1962 by Lawrence: Scholars Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. 2010. “Using Accounting History to put Relevance Back Into the Teaching of Double Entry.” Accounting, Business and Financial History 20 (1): 23–39. doi: 10.1080/09585200903504215
   Google Scholar
• Soll, J. 2014. The Reckoning: Financial Accountability and the Rise and Fall of Nations. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, C. E. (1907) 1972. The Philosophy of Accounts. Reprint, Lawrence: Scholars Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1930] 1992. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Reprint. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, G. 2008. “Fair Value and the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework Project: An Alternative View.” Abacus 44 (2): 139–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamey, B. S. 1949. “Scientific bookkeeping and the rise of capitalism. ”The Economic History Review, Second Series 1 (2&3): 99–113. doi: 10.2307/2589824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamey, B. S.. 1964. “Accounting and the Rise of Capitalism: Further Notes on a Theme by Sombart.” Journal of Accounting Research 2: 117–135. doi: 10.2307/2489995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamey, B. S. 2005. “The Historical Significance of Double-Entry Bookkeeping: Some non-Sombartian Claims.” The Accounting Historians Journal 32 (1): 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Yamey, B. S. 2010. “The Market for Luca Pacioli's Summa de Arithmetica: Some Comments.” The Accounting Historians Journal 37 (2): 145–154.
   Google Scholar