389
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How hegemony works: the fate of a presidential initiative

ORCID Icon
Received 06 Apr 2023, Accepted 16 Mar 2024, Published online: 28 Mar 2024

References

  • Abdel-Khalik, A. R. 1972. “The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Accounting Data: A Point of View.” The Accounting Review 47 (4): 791.
  • Abdel-khalik, A. R., P. R. Regier, and S. A. Reiter. 1989. “Some Thoughts on Empirical Research in Positive Theory.” In The State of Accounting Research As We Enter the 1990s, edited by T. Frecka, 153–180. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Adams, R., J. Bessant, and R. Phelps. 2006. “Innovation Management: A Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 8 (1): 21–47.
  • Agger, B. 1991. A Critical Theory of Public Life: Knowledge, Discourse and Politics in an Age of Decline. London: Routledge.
  • Ahsan, A. M. 2018. “The Global Convergence of Financial Reporting in Bangladesh.” Thesis, Macquarie University.
  • American Accounting Association. 2009. “AAACommons Update.” Accounting Education News Winter: 4.
  • American Accounting Association. 2011. Directory 2011–2012. Sarasota, Florida: AAA.
  • American Accounting Association. 2012a. 2012 AAA Annual Meeting Information. Sarasota, Florida: AAA.
  • American Accounting Association. 2012b. Board of Directors Annual Meeting Minutes - August 2012. Sarasota, Florida: AAA.
  • American Accounting Association. 2012c. Directory 2012–2013. Sarasota, Florida: AAA.
  • American Accounting Association. 2012d. “Seeds of Innovation: 2012 Annual Meeting.” Accounting Education News Annual Meeting Issue: 1–3.
  • American Accounting Association. 2018a. AAA Research Relevance Task Force: Recommendations. Lakewood Ranch, Florida: AAA.
  • American Accounting Association. 2018b. Seeds of Innovation Custom Hive. commons.aaahq/hives/a3d1bee423 (Accessed 5 January, 2018).
  • American Accounting Association. 2020. “Journal of Financial Reporting Editorial Policy.” Journal of Financial Reporting 5 (1): 135–137.
  • American Accounting Association. 2021a. Information Packet for the Accounting Review. aaahq.org/portals/0/documents/journals/journal-information-packets/2021/TAR%202021%20JIP_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 28 February, 2023).
  • American Accounting Association. 2021b. Information Packet for the Journal of Financial Reporting. aaahq.org/portals/0/documents/journals/journal-information-packets/2021/JFIR_JIP%202021_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 28 February, 2023).
  • Anderson, P. 2017. The H-Word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony. London: Verso.
  • Armstrong, P. 1994. “The Influence of Michel Foucault on Accounting Research.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5 (1): 25–55.
  • Asay, H. S., W. B. Elliott, and K. Rennekamp. 2017. “Disclosure Readability and the Sensitivity of Investors’ Valuation Judgments to Outside Information.” The Accounting Review 92 (4): 1–25.
  • Asay, H. S., and J. Hales. 2018. “Disclaiming the Future: Investigating the Impact of Cautionary Disclaimers on Investor Judgments Before and After Experiencing Economic Loss.” The Accounting Review 93 (4): 81–99.
  • Ayeko-Kümmeth, J. 2015. “Micro-hegemony and Political Orders in Uganda.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 9 (1): 27–35.
  • Ball, R. J., and P. Brown. 1968. “An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers.” Journal of Accounting Research 6 (2): 159–178.
  • Ball, R. J., and P. Brown. 2014. “Ball and Brown (1968): A Retrospective.” The Accounting Review 89 (1): 1–26.
  • Barth, M. E. 2000. “Valuation-based Accounting Research: Implications for Financial Reporting and Opportunities for Future Research.” Accounting and Finance 40 (1): 7–31.
  • Barth, M. E. 2022. Curriculum Vitae. gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/mary-e-barth (Accessed 7 December, 2022).
  • Basu, S. 2012. “How Can Accounting Researchers Become More Innovative?” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 851–870.
  • Beattie, V. 2002. “Traditions of Research in Financial Accounting.” In Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting, edited by R. Ryan, R. W. Scapens, and M. Theobald, 94–113. London: Thomson.
  • Beattie, V. 2014. “Accounting Narratives and the Narrative Turn in Accounting Research: Issues, Theory, Methodology, Methods and a Research Framework.” British Accounting Review 46 (2): 111–134.
  • Beatty, A. 2022. Curriculum Vitae. fisher.osu.edu/people/beatty.86/cv (Accessed 7 December, 2022).
  • Bernard, V. L. 1989. “Capital Market Research in Accounting During the 1980s: A Critical Review.” In The State of Accounting Research As We Enter the 1990s, edited by T. Frecka, 72–120. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Blommaert, J., and P. Varis. 2011. Enough is Enough: The Heuristics of Authenticity in Superdiversity (Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies No. 2). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University.
  • Blommaert, J., and P. Varis. 2013. Enough is Enough. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bloom, R. 1994. The Schism in Accounting. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Boland, L. A., and I. M. Gordon. 1992. “Criticizing Positive Accounting Theory.” Contemporary Accounting Research 9 (1): 142–170.
  • Bricker, R. J., and G. J. Previts. 1990. “The Sociology of Accountancy: A Study of Academic and Practice Community Schisms.” Accounting Horizons 4 (1): 1–14.
  • Brooks, C., and L. Schopohl. 2018. “Topics and Trends in Finance Research: What Is Published, Who Publishes It and Who Gets Cited?” British Accounting Review 50 (6): 615–637.
  • Brown, L. D. 1996. “Influential Accounting Articles, Individuals, Ph.D. Granting Institutions and Faculties: A Citational Analysis.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (7–8): 723–754.
  • Brown, R., and M. Jones. 2015. “Mapping and Exploring the Topography of Contemporary Financial Accounting Research.” British Accounting Review 47 (3): 237–261.
  • Cahill, D. 2014. The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cascino, S., M. Clatworthy, B. G. Osma, J. Gassen, S. Imam, and T. Jeanjean. 2014. “Who Uses Financial Reports and for What Purpose? Evidence from Capital Providers.” Accounting in Europe 11 (2): 185–209.
  • Chan, K. C., K. C. Chan, G. S. Seow, and K. Tam. 2009. “Ranking Accounting Journals Using Dissertation Citation Analysis: A Research Note.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6): 875–885.
  • Chapman, C. S. 2012. “Framing the Issue of Research Quality in a Context of Research Diversity.” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 821–831.
  • Chartered Association of Business Schools. 2021. Academic Journal Guide. London: CABS.
  • Chen, Q., J. Gerakos, V. Glode, and D. J. Taylor. 2016. “Thoughts on the Divide Between Theoretical and Empirical Research in Accounting.” Journal of Financial Reporting 1 (2): 47–58.
  • Chisholm, M. 2015. “Developing Counterhegmonic Pedagogy in Adult and Higher Education.” Proceedings of the 2015 Adult Education Research Conference. newprairiepress.org/aerc/2015/papers/12 (Accessed 11 February, 2023).
  • Chow, C. W., and R.-R. Duh. 2013. “On Why and How to Break Down the Silos in Accounting Research (With an Illustrative Study at the Interface Between Financial and Management Accounting).” China Journal of Accounting Studies 1 (2): 63–90.
  • Christ, M. H., M. Eulerich, R. Krane, and D. A. Wood. 2021. “New Frontiers for Internal Audit Research.” Accounting Perspectives 20 (4): 449–475.
  • Copland, F., and A. Creese. 2015. “Ethical Issues in Linguistic Ethnography: Balancing the Micro and the Macro.” In Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research, edited by P. I. De Costa, 161–178. London: Routledge.
  • Crehan, K. 2002. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
  • Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Davis, A. K., D. A. Guenther, L. K. Krull, and B. M. Williams. 2016. “Do Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes?” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 47–68.
  • DeFond, M. L., L. Chee Yeow, and Z. Yoonseok. 2016. “Client Conservatism and Auditor-Client Contracting.” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 69–98.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X. 2009. “It Takes a Village: Taking Greater Advantage of Our Scholarly Diversity.” Television & New Media 10 (1): 46–48.
  • Demski, J. S. 2007. “Is Accounting an Academic Discipline?” Accounting Horizons 21 (2): 153–157.
  • Demski, J. S., N. Dopuch, B. Lev, J. Ronen, G. Searfoss, and S. Sunder. 1991. A Statement on the State of Academic Accounting: Statement to the Research Director of the American Accounting Association. Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association.
  • Desai, D. 2021. “Law and Development Experts.” In Encyclopedia of Law and Development, edited by K. de Feyter, G. E. Türkelli, and S. de Moerloose, 166–168. Cheltenham, Gloucester: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Devine, C. T. 1999. Essays in Accounting Theory. Edited by H.S. Hendrickson. New York: Garland.
  • Dopuch, N., and J. Ronen. 1991. Covering Note to “A Statement on the State of Academic Accounting”. New York: Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research, New York University.
  • Dumay, J., C. de Villiers, J. Guthrie, and P. Hsiao. 2018. “Thirty Years of Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal: A Critical Study of the Journal’s Most Cited Articles.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31 (5): 1510–1541.
  • Dyckman, T. R., and S. A. Zeff. 1984. “Two Decades of the Journal of Accounting Research.” Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1): 225–297.
  • Dyer, T. A., M. H. Lang, and L. Stice-Lawrence. 2017. “Discussion of: 10-K Disclosure Repetition and Managerial Reporting Incentives: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go with Textual Research?” Journal of Financial Reporting 2 (1): 133–138.
  • Dzuranin, A. C., and I. Mălăescu. 2016. “The Current State and Future Direction of IT Audit: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Information Systems 30 (1): 7–20.
  • Endenich, C., and R. Trapp. 2018. “Signaling Effects of Scholarly Profiles: The Editorial Teams of North American Accounting Association Journals.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51: 4–23.
  • Erb, C., and C. Pelger. 2015. “’Twisting Words’? A Study of the Construction and Reconstruction of Reliability in Financial Reporting Standard-setting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 40: 13–40.
  • Erickson, D., M. Hewitt, and L. A. Maines. 2017. “Do Investors Perceive Low Risk When Earnings are Smooth Relative to the Volatility of Operating Cash Flows? Discerning Opportunity and Incentive to Report Smooth Earnings.” The Accounting Review 92 (3): 137–154.
  • Fagerberg, J. 2009. “Innovation: A Guide to the Literature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, and D. C. Mowery, 1–26. Oxford: OUP.
  • Fellingham, J. C. 2007. “Is Accounting an Academic Discipline?” Accounting Horizons 21 (2): 159–163.
  • Ferretti, F. 2019. “Between Radical Geography and Humanism: Anne Buttimer and the International Dialogue Project.” Antipode 51 (4): 1123–1145.
  • Fogarty, T. 2011. “The Social Construction of Research Advice: The American Accounting Association Plays Miss Lonelyhearts.” Accounting and the Public Interest 11 (1): 32–51.
  • Fogarty, T., and S. Ravenscroft. 2000. “Making Accounting Knowledge: Peering at Power.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 11 (4): 409–431.
  • Fogarty, T. J., and G. A. Jonas. 2010. “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle: Disciplinary Socialization at the American Accounting Association’s Doctoral Consortium.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (4): 303–317.
  • Fogarty, T. J., and C.-H. Liao. 2009. “Blessed Are the Gatekeepers: A Longitudinal Study of the Editorial Boards of The Accounting Review.” Issues in Accounting Education 24 (3): 299–318.
  • Fogarty, T. J., D. V. Saftner, and J. R. Hasselback. 2011. “Knowing One’s Place: The Distribution of New Accounting Academics into a Segmented Labor Market.” Journal of Accounting Education 29 (2): 89–99.
  • Fogarty, T. J., and A. Zimmerman. 2019. “Few Are Called, Fewer Are Chosen: Elite Reproduction in U.S. Academic Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 60: 1–17.
  • French, S., and J. Saatsi, eds. 2011. The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London: Continuum.
  • Gassen, J. 2014. “Causal Inference in Empirical Archival Financial Accounting Research.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (7): 535–544.
  • Gates, S. K. 2011. “The Crisis in Accounting Academic Research: An Examination of Source Credibility.” Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research 6 (2): 60–76.
  • Gendron, Y. 2015. “Accounting Academia and the Threat of the Paying-off Mentality.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 168–176.
  • Gilbert, C., and J. Everett. 2023. “Resistance, Hegemony, and Critical Accounting Interventions: Lessons from Debates Over Government Debt.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 97: Article number: 102556.
  • Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gordon, I. M., and L. A. Boland. 2015. “Anatomy of a Journal: A Reflection on the Evolution of Contemporary Accounting Research, 1984–2010.” Accounting History 20 (4): 464–489.
  • Gordon, J. 1997. “John Stuart Mill and the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’.” Social Theory & Practice 23 (2): 235–249.
  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selection from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Gramsci, A. 1992. Prison Notebooks, Vol. I. Edited by J. A. Buttigieg, translated by J. A. Buttigieg and A. Callari. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Granof, M. H., and S. A. Zeff. 2008. “Research on Accounting Should Learn from the Past.” Chronicle of Higher Education 54 (28): A34.
  • Hamermesh, D. S. 2013. “Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?” Journal of Economic Literature 51 (1): 162–172.
  • Harris, R. 2021. “Battle in the mind fields by John A. Goldsmith and Bernard Laks.” Language 97 (1): 194–200.
  • Hartley, R. 2015. “Japan and the Greater Mekong Sub-region: Hegemony in the Making or Hegemony Already Established?” Thesis, University of Sheffield.
  • Heflin, F., W. J. Kross, and S. Inho. 2016. “Asymmetric Effects of Regulation FD on Management Earnings Forecasts.” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 119–152.
  • Helgadóttir, O. 2022. “Seeing Like a Macroeconomist: Varieties of Formalisation, Professional Incentives and Academic Ideational Change.” New Political Economy 27 (3): 426–440.
  • Henry, S., F. Navakas, and J. Fiscella. 2005. “Disciplinary Hegemony Meets Interdisciplinary Ascendancy: Can Interdisciplinary/Integrative Studies Survive, and, If So, How?” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 23: 1–37.
  • Hopwood, A. G. 2007. “Whither Accounting Research?” The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1365–1374.
  • Horton, J. 2020. “On the Musicological Necessity of Musical Analysis.” The Musical Quarterly 103 (1–2): 62–104.
  • Humphrey, C. 2001. “Paper Prophets and the Continuing Case for Thinking Differently About Accounting Research.” British Accounting Review 33 (1): 91–104.
  • Humphrey, C., and Y. Gendron. 2015. “What is Going On? The Sustainability of Accounting Academia.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 47–66.
  • Hunt, A. 1990. “Rights and Social Movements: Counterhegemonic Strategies.” Journal of Law and Society 17 (3): 309–328.
  • Jensen, R. E. 2023. Accountics scientists on the AAACommons. trinity.edu/∼rjensen/temp/AccountincsDamn.htm#Essays (accessed 20 February, 2023).
  • Johnston, R. 2000. “On Disciplinary History and Textbooks: Or Where Has Spatial Analysis Gone?” Australian Geographical Studies 38 (2): 125–137.
  • Jones, M. J., and P. A. Shoemaker. 1994. “Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability.” Journal of Accounting Literature 13: 142–184.
  • Jones, S. 2015. “Abacus: The First 50 Years.” Abacus 51 (4): 485–498.
  • Kaplan, R. S. 2011. “Accounting Scholarship that Advances Professional Knowledge and Practice.” The Accounting Review 86 (2): 367–383.
  • Karrebæk, M. S., and N. Ghandchi. 2015. “‘Pure’ Farsi and Political Sensitivities: Language and Ideologies in Farsi Complementary Language Classrooms in Denmark.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (1): 62–90.
  • Lambert, R. 2022. Curriculum Vitae. faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Lambert-August-2015.pdf (Accessed 7 December, 2022).
  • Lears, T. J. 1985. “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities.” The American Historical Review, 90 (3): 567–593.
  • Lee, J. 2016. “Can Investors Detect Managers’ Lack of Spontaneity? Adherence to Predetermined Scripts during Earnings Conference Calls.” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 229–250.
  • Lee, T. A. 1995. “Shaping the US Academic Accounting Research Profession: The American Accounting Association and the Social Construction of a Professional Elite.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 241–261.
  • Lee, T. A. 1997. “The Editorial Gatekeepers of the Accounting Academy.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 (1): 11–30.
  • Lee, T. A. 1999. “Anatomy of a Professional Élite: The Executive Commitee of the American Accounting Association 1916–1996.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (2): 247–264.
  • Lee, T. A. 2008. “Financial Accounting Theory.” In The Routledge Companion to Accounting History, edited by J. R. Edwards, and S. P. Walker, 139–161. London: Routledge.
  • Lester, J. 1995. Modern Tsars and Princes: The Struggle for Hegemony in Russia. London: Verso.
  • Lev, B. 1989. “On the Usefulness of Earnings and Earnings Research: Lessons and Directions from Two Decades of Empirical Research.” Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Supplement): 153–192.
  • Li, F. 2008. “Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2/3): 221–247.
  • Li, V. 2016. “Do False Financial Statements Distort Peer Firms’ Decisions?” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 251–278.
  • Libby, R., and K. M. Rennekamp. 2016. “Experienced Financial Managers’ Views of the Relationships among Self-Serving Attribution Bias, Overconfidence, and the Issuance of Management Forecasts: A Replication.” Journal of Financial Reporting 1 (1): 131–136.
  • Littleton, A. C. 1953. Structure of Accounting Theory. np: American Accounting Association.
  • Lukka, K., and E. Kasanen. 1996. “Is Accounting a Global or a Local Discipline? Evidence from Major Research Journals.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (7): 755–773.
  • Malsch, B., and S. Tessier. 2015. “Journal Ranking Effects on Junior Academics: Identity Fragmentation and Politicization.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 84–98.
  • Maly, I. 2019. Hipsterification and Capitalism: A Digital Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Ghent (Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies No. 232). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
  • Martin, J. 2012. “Coordinating with Others: Outlining a Pragmatic, Perspectival Psychology of Personhood.” New Ideas in Psychology 30 (1): 131–143.
  • Mattessich, R. 1995. Critique of Accounting: Examination of the Foundations and Normative Structure of an Applied Discipline. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum.
  • McCarthy, W. E. 2012. “Accounting Craftspeople versus Accounting Seers: Exploring the Relevance and Innovation Gaps in Academic Accounting Research.” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 833–843.
  • Moghtader, M. M. 2003. Lives on the Disciplinary Boundary: Toward a Hybrid English Studies Graduate Teacher. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico.
  • Moser, D. V. 2012. “Is Accounting Research Stagnant?” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 845–850.
  • Nilsen, A. G., and S. Roy, eds. 2015. New Subaltern Politics: Reconceptualising Hegemony and Resistance in Contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Ntarangwi, M., D. Mills, M. H. Babiker, and M. B. Ahmed, eds. 2006. African Anthropologies: History, Critique and Practice. Dakar and London: CODESRIA and Zed Books.
  • Obamamoye, B. F. 2023. “When Neo-Gramscians Engage the Postcolonial: Insights Into Subaltern Consent and Dissent in the Re/Unmaking of Hegemonic Orders.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 48 (2): 115–132.
  • Oler, D. K., M. J. Oler, and C. J. Skousen. 2010. “Characterizing Accounting Research.” Accounting Horizons 24 (4): 635–670.
  • Panozzo, F. 1997. “The Making of the Good Academic Accountant.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (5): 447–480.
  • Parker, L., J. Guthrie, and R. Gray. 1998. “Accounting and Management Research: Passwords from the Gatekeepers.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (4): 371–406.
  • [The] Pathways Commission. 2012. Charting a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants. New York: American Acounting Association and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
  • Poole, S. 2016. Rethink: The Surprising History of New Ideas. London: Random House.
  • Power, M. K., and Y. Gendron. 2015. “Qualitative Research in Auditing: A Methodological Roadmap.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (2): 147–165.
  • Prado, C. G. 2000. Starting with Foucault: An Introduction to Genealogy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Quintane, E., R. M. Casselman, B. S. Reiche, and P. A. Nylund. 2011. “Innovation as a Knowledge-based Outcome.” Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (6): 928–947.
  • Raj, P. P. E. 2021. Contested Histories and Politics of People: Theorizing Subalternity. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Ravenscroft, S., and P. F. Williams. 2021. “Sustaining Discreditable Accounting Research Through Ignorance: The Mainstream Elite’s Response to the 2008 Financial Crisis.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 95: 101280.
  • Reiter, S. A. 1998. “Economic Imperialism and the Crisis in Financial Accounting Research.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 9 (2): 143–171.
  • Reiter, S. A., and P. F. Williams. 2002. “The Structure and Progressivity of Accounting Research: The Crisis in the Academy Revisited.” Accounting Organizations and Society 27 (6): 575–607.
  • Roberts, R. W. 2018. “We Can Do So Much Better: Reflections on Reading ‘Signaling Effects of Scholarly Profiles: The Editorial Teams of North American Accounting Association Journals’.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51: 70–77.
  • Rodgers, J. L., and P. F. Williams. 1996. “Patterns of Research Productivity and Knowledge Creation at The Accounting Review: 1967–1993.” The Accounting Historians Journal 23 (1): 51–88.
  • Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. 2023. “An Essay about a Philosophical Attitude in Management and Organization Studies Based on Parrhesia.” Philosophy of Management 22 (4): 587–618.
  • Rosa, A. A. 2015. “The Power of Locality and the Use of English: A Case Study of Non-translation in the Portuguese Blogosphere.” In How Peripheral is the Periphery? Translating Portugal Back and Forth: Essays in Honour of João Ferreira Duarte, edited by R. B. Maia, M. P. Pinto, and S. R. Pinto, 205–221. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
  • Roslender, R. 2018a. “Introduction.” In The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting, edited by R. Roslender, 2–18. London: Routledge.
  • Roslender, R., eds. 2018b. The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting. London: Routledge.
  • Rutherford, B. A. 2016. “The Struggle to Fabricate Accounting Narrative Obfuscation: An Actor-Network-Theoretic Analysis of a Failing Project.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 13 (1): 57–85.
  • Rutherford, B. A. 2018. “Narrating the Narrative Turn in Narrative Accounting Research: Scholarly Knowledge Development or Flat Science?” Meditari Accountancy Research 26 (1): 13–43.
  • Schrand, C. M. 2016. “Editorial: Journal of Financial Reporting Inaugural Issue: Defining Our Content.” Journal of Financial Reporting 1 (1): 1–13.
  • Schriewer, K. 2020. “Land Reclamations: Boundary Work as Production of Disciplinary Uniqueness.” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 29 (2): 108–113.
  • Schulz, Jr., J. J., J. A. Meade, and I. Khurana. 1989. “The Changing Roles of Teaching, Research, and Service in the Promotion and Tenure Decisions for Accounting Faculty.” Issues in Accounting Education 4 (1): 109–119.
  • Schwartz, B. N., S. Williams, and P. F. Williams. 2005. “US Doctoral Students’ Familiarity with Accounting Journals: Insights into the Structure of the US Academy.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (3): 327–348.
  • Shadrack, J. H. 2020. “‘Women! Stop Ruining Metal!’ Mapping Extreme Metal.” In Black Metal, Trauma, Subjectivity and Sound: Screaming the Abyss, edited by J. H. Shadrack, 23–56. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Sterling, R. R. 1990. “Positive Accounting: An Assessment.” Abacus 26 (2): 97–135.
  • Sunder, S. 2011. “Imagined Worlds of Accounting.” Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium 1 (1), Article 8.
  • Swanson, E. P., C. J. Wolfe, and A. Zardkoohi. 2007. “Concentration in Publishing at Top-Tier Business Journals: Evidence and Potential Explanations.” Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (4): 1255–1289.
  • Tang, M., and S. Venkataraman. 2018. “How Patterns of Past Guidance Provision Affect Investor Judgments: The Joint Effect of Guidance Frequency and Guidance Pattern Consistency.” The Accounting Review 93 (3): 327–348.
  • Tourish, D., and H. Willmott. 2015. “In Defiance of Folly: Journal Rankings, Mindless Measures and the ABS Guide.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 37–46.
  • Twedt, B. 2016. “Spreading the Word: Price Discovery and Newswire Dissemination of Management Earnings Guidance.” The Accounting Review 91 (1): 317–346.
  • Vickers, P. 2011. “A Brief Chronology of the Philosophy of Science.” In The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. French, and J. Saatsi, 358–402. London: Continuum.
  • Wallace, R. L., and S. G. Clark. 2018. “Environmental Studies and Sciences in a Time of Chaos: Problems, Contexts, and Recommendations.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 8: 110–113.
  • Warsono, S. 2015. “The Relationality of Rules of Debit and Credit.” The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 53–74.
  • Waymire, G. B. 2012a. “Introduction for Essays on the State of Accounting Scholarship.” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 817–819.
  • Waymire, G. B. 2012b. “Seeds of Innovation in Accounting Scholarship.” Issues in Accounting Education 27 (4): 1077–1093.
  • Weiner, G. 1998. “Scholarship, Disciplinary Hegemony and Power in Academic Publishing”. Paper presented at the European Conference for Educational Research, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 17–20 September.
  • Whittington, G. 1986. “Financial Accounting Theory: An Overview.” British Accounting Review 18 (2): 4–41.
  • Whittington, G. 1987. “Positive Accounting: A Review Article.” Accounting and Business Research 17 (68): 327–336.
  • Whittington, G. 2021. “Reflections on Chambers’ Odyssey.” Accounting History 26 (2): 322–331.
  • Williams, P. F. 1989. “The Logic of Positive Accounting Research.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 14 (5/6): 455–468.
  • Williams, P. F. 2003. “Modern Accounting Scholarship: The Imperative of Positive Accounting Science.” Accounting Forum 27 (3): 251–269.
  • Williams, P. F., J. G. Jenkins, and L. Ingraham. 2006. “The Winnowing Away of Behavioral Accounting Research in the US: The Process for Anointing Academic Elites.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (8): 783–818.
  • Williams, P. F., and J. L. Rodgers. 1995. “The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 263–287.
  • Williams, R. 1973. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” New Left Review (Old Series 82), 3–16.
  • Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Worth, O., and C. Kuhling. 2004. “Counter-hegemony, Anti-globalisation and Culture in International Political Economy.” Capital & Class 28 (3): 31–42.
  • Wyatt, A. R. 1991. “A Perspective on the Sociology of Accounting Schisms.” Research in Accounting Regulation 5: 181–187.
  • Xu, Z. 2013. “Globalization, Culture and ELT Materials: A Focus on China.” Multilingual Education 3: 1–19.
  • Zeff, S. A. 1983. “A Retrospective.” The Accounting Review 58 (1): 129–134.
  • Zeff, S. A., and T. R. Dyckman. 2018. “A Historical Study of the First 30 Years of Accounting Horizons.” Accounting Historians Journal 45 (1): 115–131.