347
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are these friends also “friends of the court”?: examining minority legal advocacy organization coalitions in amicus brief filings

, &
Pages 489-508 | Received 29 Nov 2016, Accepted 06 Sep 2017, Published online: 23 Nov 2017

References

  • Blalock, Hubert. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley Press.
  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Dino Christenson. 2014. “The Evolution and Formation of Amicus Curiae Networks.” Social Networks 36: 82–96. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.003
  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Dino Christenson, and Matthew Hitt. 2013. “Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 446–460. doi: 10.1017/S000305541300021X
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. 1954. 347 U.S. 483.
  • Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82 (4): 1109–1127. doi: 10.2307/1961752
  • Caldeira, Gregory, and John Wright. 1990. “Amici Curiae Before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” The Journal of Politics 52: 782–806. doi: 10.2307/2131827
  • Clarke, Susan E., Rodney E. Hero, Mara S. Sidney, Luis R. Fraga, and Bari A. Erlichson. 2006. Multiethnic Moments: The Politics of Urban Education Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Collins, Paul M., Jr. 2004. “Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation.” Law & Society Review 38 (4): 807–832. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00067.x
  • Collins, Paul M., Jr. 2008. “The Consistency of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 861–873. doi: 10.1017/S002238160808081X
  • Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford. 1857. 60 U.S. 393.
  • Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Epstein, Lee, and C. K. Rowland. 1991. “Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts.” American Political Science Review 85: 205–217. doi: 10.2307/1962886
  • Gay, Claudine. 2006. “Seeing Difference: The Effect of Economic Disparity on Black Attitudes Toward Latinos.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 982–997. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00228.x
  • Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (03): 564–581. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714001595
  • Giles, Michael, and Arthur Evans. 1986. “The Power Approach to Intergroup Hostility.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 30 (3): 469–486. doi: 10.1177/0022002786030003004
  • Gratz v. Bollinger. 2003. 539 U.S. 244.
  • Grutter v. Bollinger. 2003. 539 U.S. 306.
  • Hero, Rodney E. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two-Tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Hero, Rodney E., and Robert R. Preuhs. 2009. “Beyond (the Scope of) Conflict: National Black and Latino Advocacy Group Relations in the Congressional and Legal Arenas.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (03): 501–517. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709990831
  • Hero, Rodney E., and Robert R. Preuhs. 2010. “Black-Latino Political Relationships: Policy Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 38 (3): 531–562. doi: 10.1177/1532673X09338369
  • Hero, Rodney E., and Robert R. Preuhs. 2013. Black-Latino Relations in U.S. National Politics: Beyond Conflict or Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. “Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 61–67. doi: 10.2307/2111709
  • Kaufmann, Karen. 2003. “Cracks in the Rainbow: Group Commonality as a Basis for Latino and African-American Political Coalitions.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 199–210. doi: 10.1177/106591290305600208
  • Kearney, Joseph D., and Thomas W. Merrill. 2000. “The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the Supreme Court.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 743–855. doi: 10.2307/3312826
  • Kim, Claire Jean. 1999. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics and Society 27 (1): 105–138. doi: 10.1177/0032329299027001005
  • Klarman, Michael J. 2006. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Korematsu v. United States. 1944. 323 U.S. 214.
  • Krislov, Samuel. 1963. “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy.” Yale Law Journal 72 (4): 694–721. doi: 10.2307/794698
  • Lau v. Nichols. 1973. 414 U.S. 563.
  • Mahoney, Christine, and Frank Baumgartner. 2004. “ The Determinants and Effects of Interest-Group Coalitions.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2–5.
  • Marquez, Benjamin. 1993. LULAC: The Evolution of a Mexican American Political Organization. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Martin, Andrew, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–153. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.2.134
  • Masuoka, Natalie, and Jane Junn. 2013. The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion and Immigration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McClain, Paula D. 1993. “The Changing Dynamics of Urban Politics: Black and Hispanic Municipal Employment – Is There Competition?” Journal of Politics 55 (2): 399–414. doi: 10.2307/2132272
  • McClain, Paula D., Niambi Carter, Victoria De Francesco Soto, Monique Lyle, Jeffrey Grynaviski, Shayla Nunnally, Thomas Scotto, Alan Kendrick, Gerald Lackey, and Kendra Cotton. 2006. “Racial Distancing in a Southern City: Latino Immigrants’ Views of Black Americans.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 571–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00446.x
  • McClain, Paula D., and Steven C. Tauber. 2016. American Government in Black and White. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Preuhs, Robert R., and Rodney E. Hero. 2011. “A Different Kind of Representation: Black and Latino Descriptive Representation and the Role of Ideological Cuing.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 157–171. doi: 10.1177/1065912909346739
  • Puro, Steven. 1971. “ The Role of the Amicus Curiae in the United States Supreme Court, 1920–1966.” Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo Press.
  • Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schmidt, Ronald, Sr., Yvette Alex-Assensoh, Andy Aoki, and Rodney E. Hero. 2010. Newcomers, Outsiders, and Insiders: Immigrants and American Racial Politics in the Early 21st Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Spaeth, Harold. 2015. The US Supreme Court Judicial Database. St. Louis: Washington University.
  • Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Walker, J. L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Wasby, Stephen L. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Whitford, Andrew B. 2003. “The Structures of Interest Coalitions: Evidence from Environmental Litigation.” Business and Politics 5: 45–64. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1046

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.