Many are called but few are chosen: the emergence of Latino congressional candidates

References

• Barabak, Mark Z. 2011. “Democrats losing favor with some Latinos.” Los Angeles Times. June 11, 2011. URL: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/11/nation/la-na-latino-democrats-20110611.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, Matt A. 2007. “Si Se Puede! Latino Candidates and the Mobilization of Latino Voters.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 425–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto, Matt A. 2010. Ethnic Cues: The Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Political Participation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, Kathleen, Knox Brown, Angela X. Ocampo, Shawn Patterson, John Ray, and John Zaller. 2015. Social Choice and Coordination Problems in Open House Primaries. In American Political Science Association (APSA) Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, Kathleen, Martin Cohen, David Karol, Seth Masket, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, Christopher. 2017. First to the Party: The Group Origins of Political Transformation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bejarano, Christina E. 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Andrea. 2017. Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Crossethnic Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boatright, Robert G. 2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobo, Lawrence and Gilliam, Franklin D. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branton, Regina P. 2009. “The Importance of Race and Ethnicity in Congressional Primary Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 459–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David E. 2014. “Mobilizing Candidates: Political Actors Strategically Shape the Candidate Pool with Personal Appeals.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1 (02): 104–119.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Khari, and Ronald Brown. 2003. “Faith and Works: Church-Based Social Capital Resources and African American Political Activism.” Social Forces 82 (2): 617–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, Barbara. 2008. “Likeable? Effective Commander in Chief? Polling on Candidate Traits in the ‘Year of the Presidential Woman’.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 747–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Daniel M., and Jessica Robinson Preece. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 842–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review 90 (04): 794–812.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Rosie, Sarah Childs, and Joni Lovenduski. 2010. “Do Women Need Women Representatives?” British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 171–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canon, David T. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canon, David. 1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1119–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: American Politics and Political Economy Series University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canon, David T., Matthew M. Schousen, and Patrick J. Sellers. 1996. “The Supply Side of Congressional Redistricting: Race and Strategic Politicians, 1972–1992.” The Journal of Politics 58 (3): 846–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casellas, Jason P. 2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., D. Karol, H. Noel, and J. Zaller. 2009. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: Chicago Studies in American Politics University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, Stacey L. 2005. Inviting Latino Voters: Party Messages and Latino Party Identification. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G., and J. Katz. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 478–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (04): 390–413.
   Google Scholar
• Dade, Corey. 2011. “Republicans Make Gains with Latino Candidates.” NPR. July 25, 2011. URL: https://www.npr.org/2011/07/25/138602984/republicans-make-gains-with-latino-candidates.
   Google Scholar
• DeGregorio, C. 1997. Network of Champions: Leadership, Access, and Advocacy in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, Bruce A., Raymond J. La Raja, and Michael S. Kowal. 2015. “The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 194–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez, Casey B.K. 2011. “Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 534–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, William Curtis, and Walter Clark Wilson. 2013. “Minority Chairs and Congressional Attention to Minority Issues: The Effect of Descriptive Representation in Positions of Institutional Power.” Social Science Quarterly 94 (5): 1207–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Richard L, and Michael D McDonald. 1981. “The Election of Blacks to City Councils: Clarifying the Impact of Electoral Arrangements on the Seats/Population Relationship.” American Political Science Review 75 (02): 344–354.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Linda L., and Robert D. McClure. 1990. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard, and Jennifer Lawless. 2005. “To run or not to run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga, Bernard L. 2016. “Candidates or Districts? Reevaluating the Role of Race in Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddie, R. K., and C. S. Bullock. 2000. Elections to Open Seats in the U.S. House: Where the Action is. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Sonia R., and Marisela Marquez. 2001. “Motivational and Attitudinal Factors Amongst Latinas in US Electoral Politics.” NWSA Journal 13 (2): 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 1142–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin, and Naomi Murakawa. 2002. “Elite Cues and Political Decision Making.” Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 15–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy-Fanta, Carol. 2011. Latina Politics, Latino Politics: Gender, Culture, and Political Participation in Boston. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy-Fanta, Carol, Dianne Pinderhughes, Christine Marie Sierra, and Pei-te Lien. 2016. Contested Transformation: Race, Gender, and Political Leadership in 21st Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassell, Hans J.G. 2016. “Party Control of Party Primaries: Party Influence in Nominations for the US Senate.” The Journal of Politics 78 (1): 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, Hans J.G. 2017. The Party’s Primary: Control of Congressional Nominations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the US House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science 39: 640–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnson, Paul S., and James G. Gimpel. 1995. “District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2005. “Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000.” The Journal of Politics 67 (1): 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 773–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juenke, Eric Gonzalez. 2014. “Ignorance Is Bias: The Effect of Latino Losers on Models of Latino Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 593–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Robert R. Preuhs. 2012. “Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 705–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Paru Shah. 2015. “Not the Usual Story: the Effect of Candidate Supply on Models of Latino Descriptive Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (3): 438–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Paru Shah. 2016. “Demand and Supply: Racial and Ethnic Minority Candidates in White Districts.” The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 1 (01): 60–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, Cindy D. 2007. “Implicit Attitudes, Explicit Choices: When Subliminal Priming Predicts Candidate Preference.” Political Behavior 29 (3): 343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, Kristin, and Jonathan Woon. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazee, T. A. 1994. Who Runs for Congress?: Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Kazee, Thomas A., and Mary C. Thornberry. 1990. “Where’s the Party? Congressional Candidate Recruitment and American Party Organizations.” Political Research Quarterly 43 (1): 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Brinck, and Will Miller. 1997. “Latino Representation, It’s Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 1066–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald Philip Green. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 50 (4): 920–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, Timothy B. 1999. “The Political and Demographic Predictors of Candidate Emergence in City Council Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (2): 279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Yanna, and Spencer Piston. 2015. “Racial Prejudice, Partisanship, and White Turnout in Elections with Black Candidates.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 397–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L, and Richard L Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., and R. L. Fox. 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Dont Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, S., and C. Wolfram. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, Robert. 2014. “Race and Ethnicity in US Social Policy.” The Oxford Handbook of US Social Policy, 222.
   Google Scholar
• Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lublin, David. 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?”” American Political Science Review 93 (01): 183–186.
   Google Scholar
• Maestas, Cherie D., Sarah Fulton, L. Sandy Maisel, and Walter J. Stone. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100: 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masket, Seth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnaughy, Corrine M, Ismail K White, David L Leal, and Jason P Casellas. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” The Journal of Politics 72 (04): 1199–1211.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrief, G. F., P. Squire, and M. E. Jewell. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature?. Upper Saddle River: Real politics in America. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nuno, Stephen. 2007. “Latino Mobilization and Vote Choice in the 2000 Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 35 (2): 272–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, Angela X. 2018. “The Wielding Influence of Political Networks: Representation in Majority-Latino Districts.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (1): 184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantoja, Adrian D., and Gary M. Segura. 2003. “Fear and Loathing in California: Contextual Threat and Political Sophistication among Latino Voters.” Political Behavior 25 (3): 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piston, Spencer. 2010. “How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election.” Political Behavior 32 (4): 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuhs, Robert R., and Eric Gonzalez Juenke. 2011. “Latino U.S. State Legislators in the 1990s: Majority-Minority Districts, Minority Incorporation, and Institutional Position.” State Politics And Policy Quarterly 11 (1): 48–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, R. R., C. J. Tolbert, D. C. Bowen, and C. J. Clark. 2010. “Race and Turnout: Does Descriptive Representation in State Legislatures Increase Minority Voting?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 890–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, Stella M. 2013. Latinos in the Legislative Process: Interests and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2010. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schantz, Harvey L. 1980. “Contested and Uncontested Primaries for the U. S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (4): 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickler, Eric. 2016. Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Paru. 2014. “It Takes a Black Candidate: A Supply-Side Theory of Minority Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 266–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Paru. 2015. “Stepping up: Black Political Ambition and Success.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 278–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Carol K, Lee Sigelman, Barbara J Walkosz, and Michael Nitz. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 243–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael Peter, and Bernadette Tarallo. 1995. “Proposition 187: Global Trend or Local Narrative? Explaining Anti-Immigrant Politics in California, Arizona and Texas.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 19 (4): 664–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Daniel, and Caroline Tolbert. 2001. “The Initiative to Party.” Party Politics 7 (6): 739–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, D. C., and A. Kaiser. 2014. “Does the Mode of Candidate Selection Affect the Representativeness of Parties?” Party Politics 20 (4): 576–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, Peverill. 1995. “Candidates, Money, and Voters. Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (4): 891–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, Peverill, and Eric R. A. N. Smith. 1996. “A Further Examination of Challenger Quality in Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21 (2): 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Pauline Terrelonge. 1980. “Ambition Theory and the Black Politician.” The Western Political Quarterly 33 (1): 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Walter J., and L. Sandy Maisel. 2003. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates Nomination and General Election Prospects.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 951–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Sophia J. 2014. “Representing Latinos Examining Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 917–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word, David L., and R. Colby Perkins. 1996. Building a Spanish Surname List for the 1990s: A New Approach to an Old Problem. Population Division, US Bureau of the Census Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar