1,015
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Dialogues Paper

Women “doing” the judiciary: rethinking the justice argument for descriptive representation

&

References

  • Ankersmit, Franklin Rudolph. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.
  • Brockington, David, Todd Donovan, Shaun Bowler, and Robert Brischetto. 1998. “Minority Representation Under Cumulative and Limited Voting.” The Journal of Politics 60 (4): 1108–1125.
  • Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. American Politics and Political Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Coontz, Phyllis. 2000. “Gender and Judicial Decisions: Do Female Judges Decide Cases Differently Than Male Judges?” Gender Issues 18 (4): 59–73.
  • Davis, Sue. 1986. “The Impact of President Carter’s Judicial Selection Reforms: A Voting Analysis of the United States Courts of Appeals.” American Politics Quarterly 14 (3): 20–44.
  • Davis , Kristina. 2018. Why Are Women Lawyers Leaving the Profession. San Diego Union Tribune. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/sd-me-women-law-20180205-story.html.
  • Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–114.
  • Disch, Lisa. 2015. “The Constructivist Turn in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?” Constellations (Oxford, England) 22 (4): 487–499.
  • Dovi, Suzanne. 2012. The Good Representative. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Franceschet, Susan, and Jennifer M Piscopo. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393–425.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 2014. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gottschall, Jon. 1983. “Carter’s Judicial Appointments: The Influence of Affirmative Action and Merit Selection in Voting on the US Court of Appeals.” Judicature 67: 165–173.
  • Gruhl, John, Cassia Spohn, and Susan Welch. 1981. “Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (2): 308–322.
  • Haire, Susan B., and Laura P. Moyer. 2014. Does Diversity Matter? Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
  • Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.
  • Jacobi, Tanja, and Dylan Schweers. 2017. “Female Supreme Court Justices are Interrupted More by Male Justices and Advocates.” Harvard Business Review. Accessed December 6, 2018. https://hbr.org/2017/04/female-supreme-court-justices-are-interrupted-more-by-male-justices-and-advocates.
  • Jeandidier, Bruno, Cécile Bourreau-Dubois, Jean-Claude Ray, and Myriam Doriat-Duban. 2016. Does Gender Matter in the Civil Law Judiciary? Evidence from French Child Support Court Decisions. Strasbourg, Austria: Working Papers of BETA 2016-55, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, BDS. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2016-55.html.
  • Kang, Alice, Miki Kittilson, Valerie Hoekstra, and Maria Escobar-Lemmon. 2020. “Diverse and Inclusive High Courts: A Global and Intersectional Perspective.” Politics, Groups and Identities.
  • Karpowitz, Chris, and Tali Mendelberg. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Keddie, Amanda. 2005. “A Framework for Gender Justice: Evaluating the Transformative Capacities of Three Key Australian Schooling Initiatives.” The Australian Educational Researcher 32 (3): 83–102.
  • Kenney, Sally Jane. 2012. Gender and Justice Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. Perspectives on Gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kenney, Sally J. 2013. “Wise Latinas, Strategic Minnesotans, and the Feminist Standpoint: The Backlash Against Women Judges.” Thomas Jefferson Law Review 36: 43.
  • Kirkpatrick, Jennet. 2020. “Fairness Has a Face: Neutrality and Descriptive Representation on Courts.” Politics, Groups and Identities.
  • Kramer, Stacy. 1990. “Enter O’Connor, Exit ‘Mr. Justice’.” New York Times. November 16. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/16/news/enter-o-connor-exit-mr-justice.html.
  • Kritzer, Herbert M., and Thomas M. Uhlman. 1977. “Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant in Criminal Case Disposition.” Social Science Journal 14 (2): 77–88.
  • Krook, Mona Lena. 2016. “Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 4 (2): 268–283.
  • MacKinnon, Catharine. 2019. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination [1984].” In Feminist Legal Theory, edited by Katherine Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy, 81–94. New York: Routledge.
  • Miller, David. 2017. “Justice.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/justice/.
  • Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Moyer, Laura, John Szmer, Susan Haire, and Robert Christensen. 2020. “Diversity, Consensus, and Decision Making: Evidence from the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Politics, Groups and Identities.
  • Phillips, Anne. 1998. “Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should it Matter Who Our Representatives are?” In Feminism and Politics, edited by Anne Phillips, 224–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Rhoads, Steven E., and Christopher H. Rhoads. 2012. “Gender Roles and Infant/Toddler Care: Male and Female Professors on the Tenure Track.” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 6 (1): 13–31.
  • Saward, Michael, ed. 2000. Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association. London: Routledge.
  • Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318.
  • Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Songer, Donald R., and Kelley A. Crews-Meyer. 2000. “Does Judge Gender Matter? Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (3): 750–762.
  • Steffensmeier, Darrell, and Chris Hebert. 1999. “Women and Men Policymakers: Does the Judge’s Gender Affect the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants?” Social Forces 77 (3): 1163–1196.
  • Studlar, Donley T., and Susan Welch. 1991. “Does District Magnitude Matter? Women Candidates in London Local Elections.” The Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 457–466.
  • Thomas, Tracy. 2016. “Remedying Systemic Sex Discrimination by Gender Quotas: Just Because.” Con Law Center Articles and Publications 6: 1–24.
  • Tripp, Ali Mari. 2004. “Women’s Movements, Customary Law and Land Rights in Africa: The Case of Uganda.” African Studies Quarterly 7 (4): 1–19.
  • Trounstine, Jessica, and Melody E. Valdini. 2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member Versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 554–569.
  • Urbinati, Nadia, and Mark Warren. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.
  • Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–1174.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.