Trailblazer women in the Supreme Court of Canada

References

• Alarie, Benjamin, and Andrew Green. 2009. “Policy Preference Change and Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47 (1): 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Alarie, Benjamin, and Andrew Green. 2010. “Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 48 (3): 381–410.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, Constance. 2008. “Justice Bertha Wilson and the Politics of Feminism.” The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Law Conference 41: 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, Andre, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau, and Neil Nevitte. 2004. Canadian Election Survey, 2000. ICPSR03969-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L. 2013. “She’ll Settle It?” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 193–219.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, Ian. 2002. Friends of the Court: The Privileging of Interest Group Litigants in Canada. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Sarah, and Karen M. Collins. 2001. “Gender Differences in Leadership Styles and Management Skills.” Women in Management Review 16 (5): 244–256.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Jiwon, and Cathy Gallagher-Louisy. 2018. “Overview of Human Rights Codes by Province and Territory in Canada.” Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion. Accessed May 19 2020. https://ccdi.ca/media/1414/20171102-publications-overview-of-hr-codes-by-province-final-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, Chrisopher, and Andrea Perrella. 2012. “Regions, Regionalism and Regional Differences in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 829–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Paul M. Jr., Kenneth L. Manning, and Robert A. Carp. 2010. “Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making.” Law & Policy 32: 260–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. W. Ng, and Ronald J. Burke. 2004. “Cultural Values as Predictors of Attitudes Towards Equality and Diversity: A Canadian Experience.” Women in Management Review 19 (6): 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, Shane A. 2020. “Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (3): 596–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Shane A., Jennifer J. Jones, and Jessica Rae McBean. 2019. “The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision-Making at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Case of Male and Female Justices.” American Politics Research 47 (3): 494–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, Adam, and Maya Sen. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Department of Justice. 2018. “Section 15 – Equality Rights.” https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art15.html.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs. 2019. “Number of Federally Appointed Judges as of January 2.” Accessed January 10 2019. http://www.fja.gc.ca/appointments-nominations/judges-juges-eng.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Grabham, Emily. 2002. “Law v Canada: New Directions for Equality Under the Canadian Charter?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (4): 641–661.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, Susan B., and Laura P. Moyer. 2015. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haire, Susan B., Laura P. Moyer, and Shawn Treier. 2013. “Diversity, Deliberation, and Judicial Opinion Writing.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 303–330.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, M. J., and K. Ozan Kalkan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57: 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausegger, Lori, Matthew Hennigar, and Troy Riddell. 2009. Canadian Courts: Law, Politics and Process. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hausegger, Lori, Matthew Hennigar, and Troy Riddell. 2015. Canadian Courts: Law, Politics and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausegger, Lori, Troy Riddell, and Matthew Hennigar. 2013. “Does Patronage Matter? Connecting Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 665–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, Gregory. 2001. “Interest Group Litigation and Canadian Democracy.” In Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy, edited by Paul Howe and Peter H. Russell, 214–254. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jilani, Nadia, Donald Songer, and Susan W. Johnson. 2010. “Gender, Consciousness Raising, and Decision-Making on the Supreme Court of Canada.” Judicature 94: 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan, and Rebecca Reid. 2020. “Speaking Up: Women and Dissenting Behavior in the Supreme Court of Canada.” Justice System Journal 41 (3): 191–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan W., Donald R. Songer, and Nadia Jilani. 2011. “Judge Gender, Critical Mass, and Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 32: 237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaheny, Erin B., John Szmer, and Robert K. Christensen. 2020. “Status Characteristics and their Intersectionality: Majority Opinion Assignment in State Supreme Courts.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (5): 894–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhoff, Will, and Shane R. Thye. 2006. “Expectation States Theory and Research: New Observations from Meta-Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research 35 (2): 219–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, Fiorna, and Elizabeth Gorman. 2008. “Women in the Legal Profession.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4: 299–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk-Montgomery, Allison. 2012. “Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History.” Project of the Heritage Committee of Convocation of the Law Society of Upper Canada. Accessed May 15 2019. https://lawsocietyontario.azureedge.net/media/lso/media/legacy/pdf/d/ diversifying_guide_to_the _project_2012_05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krakauer, Lianne, and Charles P. Chen. 2003. “Gender Barriers in the Legal Profession: Implications for Career Development of Female Law Students.” Journal of Employment Counseling 40 (June): 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, Andrea, and Erin Crandell. 2015. “Questioning Judges with a Questionable Process: An Analysis of Committee Appearances by Canadian Supreme Court Candidates.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 863–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepofsky, M. David. 1992. “The Canadian Judicial Approach to Equality Rights: Freedom Ride or Roller Coaster?” Law and Contemporary Problems 55 (1): 167–199.
   Google Scholar
• L’Heureux-Dubé, Claire. 1998. “Conversations on Equality.” Manitoba Law Journal 26 (3): 273–298.
   Google Scholar
• L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire. 2000. “The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future?” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 38 (3): 495–517.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Maria Pabon. 2011. “Attorneys, Female.” In From Encyclopedia of Women in Today’s World, edited by Mary Zeiss Stange, Carol K. Oyster, and Jane E. Sloan. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, Emmett. 2012. Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role. Vancouver, CA: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredi, Christopher P. 2004. Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredi, Christopher P., and Scott Lemieux. 1999. “Judicial Discretion and Fundamental Justice: Sexual Assault in the Supreme Court of Canada.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 47 (3): 489–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Martha A., and Joanna L. Radbord. 1999. “Foundations for 15(1): Equality Rights in Canada.” Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 6 (1): 261–376.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, Peter. 2015. The End of the Charter Revolution: Looking Back from the New Normal. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, Peter, and Twyla Job. 1993. “Do Women Judges Make a Difference? An Analysis of Appeal Court Data.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 8: 135–148.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, F. L., and Avril Allen. 2001. “Feminists and the Courts: Measuring Success in Interest Group Litigation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 55–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, F. L., Peter H. Russell, and Michael J. Withey. 1992. “The Supreme Court’s First One Hundred Charter Decisions.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30: 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura. 2013. “Rethinking Critical Mass in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 34 (1): 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura P., and Susan B. Haire. 2015. “Trailblazers and Those That Followed: Personal Experiences, Gender and Judicial Empathy.” Law and Society Review 49: 665–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura P., and Holley Tankersley. 2012. “Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (4): 784–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, C. L., and Matthew E. Wetstein. 2007. Attitudinal Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostberg, C. L., and Matthew E. Wetstein. 2018. “Strategic Behaviour and Leadership Patterns of Modern Chief Justices.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 55 (2): 478–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, C. L., Matthew Wetstein, Donald R. Songer, and Susan W. Johnson. 2009. “Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts.” Comparative Political Studies 42: 763–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmilovic, Vuk. 2013. “Governmental Interventions and Judicial Decision Making: The Supreme Court of Canada in the Age of the Charter.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Miriam. 2002. “Ghosts of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Group Politics and Charter Litigation in Canadian Political Science.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Miriam. 2005. “Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada.” Politics and Society 33 (2): 327–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloway, Julie, and Emma Constante. 2015. Leading the Way: Canadian Women in the Law. Markham, ON: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald, Sue Davis, and Susan Haire. 1994. “A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Court of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 56: 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., and Susan W. Johnson. 2007. “Judicial Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40: 911–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald, Susan W. Johnson, and Jennifer Bowie. 2013. “Do Bills of Rights Matter? An Examination of Court Change, Judicial Ideology, and the Support Structure for Rights in Canada.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51 (1): 297–328.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., Susan W. Johnson, C. L. Ostberg, and Matthew E. Wetstein. 2012. Law, Ideology and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald, Miroslava Radieva, and Rebecca Reid. 2016. “Gender Diversity in the Intermediate Appellate Courts of Canada.” Justice System Journal 37: 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stribopoulos, James, and Moin A. Yahya. 2007. “Does a Judge's Party of Appointment or Gender Matter to Case Outcomes? An Empirical Study of the Court of Appeal for Ontario.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45: 315–364.
   Google Scholar
• Tasker, John Paul. 2017. “Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin Retiring from Supreme Court.” CBC News, June 12. Accessed May 19 2020. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/supreme-court-canada-announcement-1.4157132.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, C. Neal, and Roger Handberg. 1991. “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 460–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhala, Lisa. 2009. “Disability Rights Activists in the Supreme Court of Canada: Legal Mobilization Theory and Accommodating Social Movements.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 981–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Jill D., and Laura Beth Nielsen. 2012. “Examining Empathy: Discrimination, Experience, and Judicial Decisionmaking.” Southern California Law Review 85: 314–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetstein, Matthew, and C. L. Ostberg. 2017. Value Change in the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahorsky, Rachel M., and G. M. Filisko. 2013. “Women in Charge: Stories Vary, But Their Truth is the Same – They are at the Top of Their Game.” ABA Journal 9.
   Google Scholar