Expanding democracy: debating legislative and corporate board quotas In five European states

References

• Bacci, Carol. 2006. “Arguing for and Against Quotas.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, edited by Drude Dahlerup, 32–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Andrea. 2016. “Women on Corporate Boards: A Comparison of Parliamentary Discourse in the United Kingdom and France.” Politics & Gender 12: 443–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale-Olsen, Harald, Pal Schone, and Mette Verner. 2012. “Women on Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Denmark and Norway.” In Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Frederik Englestad and Mari Teigen, 211–234. Emerald Group: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Science Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Englestad, Frederik, and Mari Teigen. 2012. “Introduction: Gender and Varieties of Economic Power: The Significance of Family and State.” In Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Frederik Englestad and Mari Teigen, xvi–xxii. Emerald Group: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Leon D. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. London: Pall Mall.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschet, Susan, and Jennifer Piscopo. 2013. “Equality, Democracy, and the Broadening and Deepening of Gender Quotas.” Politics & Gender 9 (3): 310–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidenvall, Lenita. 2015. “Gender Quota Spill-over in Sweden: from Politics to Business?” Working Paper, European University Institute/Law (28).
   Google Scholar
• Freidenvall, Lenita. 2018. “Gender Equality Without Legislated Quotas in Sweden.” In Engendering Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas, edited by Élénore Lépinard and Ruth Rubio-Marín, 366–399. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter, and David Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, Anne Maria.2011. “Transforming Local Politics: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Finland..” In Women and Representation in Local Government: International Case Studies, edited by Barbara Pini and Paula McDonald, 142–158. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie, Pamela Paxton, and Mona Lena Krook. 2017. “Gender Quotas for Legislatures and Corporate Boards.” Annual Review of Sociology 43: 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 367–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona Lena. 2016. “Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance.” Politics, Groups, Identities 4 (2): 268–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona Lena, Joni Lovenduski, and Judith Squires. 2009. “Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship.” British Journal of Political Science 39: 781–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lépinard, Eléonore. 2018. “The French Parity Reform : the Never-ending Quest for a New Gender Equality Principle..” In Transforming Gender Citizenship : the Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe, edited by Eléonore Lépinard and Ruth Rubio Marin, 62–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lépinard, Eléonore, and Marylène Lieber. 2015. The Policy on Gender Equality in France. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Lépinard, Élénore, and Ruth Rubio-Marín. 2018. Transforming Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy, Jacqueline Laufer, and Frédérique Pigeyre. 2018. Pathways to Concrete Outcomes in Equal Employment Policy Implementation in France and Canada.” French Politics 16 (3): 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2013. “Quotas, Quotas Everywhere: From Party Regulations to Gender Quotas for Corporate Management Boards.” Representation 49 (4): 453–466.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2014. Fact Sheet on Belgium. San Domenico de Fiesole: European Union Institute.https://blogs.eui.eu/genderquotas/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2015/04/Executive-summary-Belgium-Meier2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2014. “Quotas for Advisory Committees, Business and Politics: Just More of the Same?” International Political Science Review 35 (1): 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2018. “Gender Quotas in Belgium: Consolidating the Citizenship Model While Challenging the Conception of Gender Equality.” In Transforming Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe, edited by Élénore Lépinard and Ruth Rubio-Marín, 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mensi-Klarbach, Heike, and Cathrine Seierstad. 2020. “Gender Quotas on Corporate Boards: Similarities and Differences in Quota Scenarios.” European Management Review 17 (3): 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer. 2016. “Democracy as Gender Balance: the Shift from Quotas to Parity in Latin America.” Politics, Groups and Identities 4 (2): 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer, and Susan Clark Muntean. 2018. “Corporate Quotas and Symbolic Politics in Advanced Democracies.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (3): 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Darren, and Daria Roithmayr. 2014. “More Than a Woman: Insights Into Corporate Governance After the French Sex Quota.” Indiana Law Review 48 (3): 889–929.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Joan Wallach. 2005. Parité!: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, Judith. 2001. “Representing Groups, Deconstructing Identities.” Feminist Theory 2 (1): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, Mari. 2012. “Gender Quotas on Corporate Boards: On the Diffusion of a Distinct National Policy Reform.” Comparative Social Research 29: 115–146.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, Mari. 2018a. “Can Descriptive Representation be Justified Outside Politics?” In Democratic State and Democratic Society: Institutional Change in the Nordic Model, edited by Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrin Holst, and Gunnar Aakvaag. Warsaw: De Gruyter Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, Mari. 2018b. “The ‘Natural’ Prolongation of the Norwegian Gender Equality Policy Institution.” In Transforming Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe, edited by Élénore Lépinard and Ruth Rubio-Marín, 341–365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terjesen, Siri, Ruth Aguilera, and Ruth Lorenz. 2015. “Legislating a Woman’s Seat on the Board: Institutional Factors Driving Gender Quotas for Boards of Directors.” Journal of Business Ethics 128: 233–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verge, Tania, and Emanuela Lombardo. 2015. “The Differential Approach to Gender Quotas in Spain: Regulated Politics and Self-regulated Corporate Boards.” European University Institute/Law 24.
   Google Scholar
• Villiers, Charlotte. 2010. “Achieving Gender Balance in the Boardroom.” Legal Studies 30 (4): 533–557.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar