Civically engaged research in political science: a methodological guide

References

• AIATSIS. 2020. AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsneault, Shelly, Dang Do, Curtis Kline, Matilde Ceron, Ashley Nickels. 2024. “What Do We Mean by ‘Community’? Defining Community for Civically Engaged Research.” Politics, Groups, and Identities, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Asiamah, Gildfred B., Mohammed S. Awal, and Lauren M. MacLean. 2021. “Collaboration for Designing, Conceptualizing, and (Possibly) Decolonizing Research in African Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assembly of First Nations. 2011. “First Nations Ethics Guide on Research and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge.” Ottawa: Assembly of First Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista-Chavez, Angie, Dulce Juarez, and Andrea Whiting. 2024. “Community Research Consultants and Civically Engaged Research.” Politics, Groups, and Identities.
   Google Scholar
• Binet, Andrew, Vedette Gavin, Leigh Carroll, and Mariana Arcaya. 2019. “Designing and Facilitating Collaborative Research Design and Data Analysis Workshops: Lessons Learned in the Healthy Neighborhoods Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (3): 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracic, Ana. 2018. “For Better Science: The Benefits of Community Engagement in Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (03): 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000446.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, Graham, and Douglas R. Hess. 2021. “Defining Civically Engaged Research as Scholarship in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 716–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Stephanie Rainie, Tahu Kukutai, Maggie Walter, Oscar Luis Figueroa-Rodriguez, Jennifer Walker, and Per Axelsson. 2019. “Issues in Open Data—Indigenous Data Sovereignty.” In The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons, edited by Tim Davies, Stephen Walker, Mor Rubinstein, and Fernando Perini, 300–319. Cape Town: African Minds and International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, Suzanne B., Sarah Adeky, Alex J. Allen III, Jason Corburn, Barbara A. Israel, Jaime Montaño, Alvin Rafelito, Scott D. Rhodes, Samara Swanston, Nina Wallerstein, and Eugenia Eng. 2008. “The Power and the Promise: Working with Communities to Analyze Data, Interpret Findings, and Get to Outcomes.” American Journal of Public Health 98 (8): 1407-1417. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.113571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina, Michael Dorsch, and Paul Maarek. 2022. “What, Where, Who and Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (4): 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652200066X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, Jennifer. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology from a Skeptical but Nonetheless Sympathetic Point of View.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, Kirstie Lynn, Douglas R. Hess, Graham Bullock, and Adriano Udani. 2021. “Introduction to the Symposium: Civically Engaged Research and Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 711–715. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, Lisa, Deborah Piatelli, and Lean Schmalzbauer. 2007. “Researching Inequality through Interpretive Collaborations: Shifting Power and the Unspoken Contract.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (6): 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorussen, Han, Zorzeta Bakaki, and Athena R. Kolbe. 2021. “Challenges of Using Collaborative Methodologies in Surveying Political Trust in Haiti.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, Jesse. 2021. Doing Global Fieldwork: A Social Scientist’s Guide to Mixed-Methods Research Far from Home. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, Jesse, and Caroline Schuster. 2017. “Spies Like Us.” Ethnography 19 (3): 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138117711717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, Colin, Diana Kapiszewski, and Arthur Lupia. 2018. “Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 21 (1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-025429.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, Tammy. 2020. “Feminist Community-Based Research in Public Policy.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firchow, Pamina. 2018. Reclaiming Everyday Peace: Local Voices in Measurement and Evaluation after War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firchow, Pamina, and Mneesha Gellman. 2021. “Collaborative Methodologies: Why, How, and for Whom?” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firchow, Pamina, and Roger Mac Ginty. 2017. “Measuring Peace: Comparability, Commensurability, and Complementarity Using Bottom-Up Indicators.” International Studies Review 19 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flicker, Sarah, Patricia O’Campo, Renée Monchalin, Jesse Thistle, Catherine Worthington, Renée Masching, Adrian Guta, Sherri Pooyak, Wanda Whitebird, and Cliff Thomas. 2015. “Research Done in “A Good Way”: The Importance of Indigenous Elder Involvement in HIV Community-Based Research.” American Journal of Public Health 105 (6): 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, Thomas Edward. 2021. “Everyday Democracy Indicators? How the Study of Democracy Illuminates the Value (and Challenges) of Collaborative Methodologies.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, Chelsea, and Nicole Goodman. 2021. “Methodological and Academic Challenges in Canadian Political Science: The Value of a Socially Engaged Approach for Indigenous Research.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 9 (2): 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology with Indigenous Communities: A Framework for Addressing Power Inequalities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosn, Faten, and Sarah E. Parkinson. 2019. “‘Finding’ Sectarianism and Strife in Lebanon.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (03): 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000143.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Charles R., and Lynn Stephen. 2013. Otros Saberes: Collaborative Research on Indigenous and Afro-Descendant Cultural Politics. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Hahrie, and Neil Stenhouse. 2015. “Bridging the Research-Practice Gap in Climate Communication: Lessons from One Academic-Practitioner Collaboration.” Science Communication 37 (3): 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014560828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, Biz, Amma Panin, Elizabeth Iams Wellman, Graeme Blair, Lindsey D. Pruett, Ken Ochieng’ Opalo, Hannah M. Alarian, et al. 2022. “Field Experiments in the Global South: Assessing Risks, Localizing Benefits, and Addressing Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (4): 769–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, Coen, Dominique M. David-Chavez, Shanny Spang Gion, and Vincent van Uitregt. 2023. “Moving Beyond Ontological (Worldview) Supremacy: Indigenous Insights and a Recovery Guide for Settler-Colonial Scientists.” Journal of Experimental Biology 226:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Suzanne F. 2008. “A Participatory Group Process to Analyze Qualitative Data.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 2 (2): 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson, Jenn M., Brian Shoup, and H. Howell Williams. 2021. “Why Civically Engaged Research? Understanding and Unpacking Researcher Motivations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 721–724. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapiszewski, Diana, Lauren M. MacLean, and Benjamin L. Read. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapiszewski, Diana, Lauren M. MacLean, and Benjamin L. Read. 2022. “Dynamic Research Design: Iteration in Field-Based Inquiry.” Comparative Politics 54 (4): 645–670. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522X16352603126875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Oliver. 2021. “Balancing Rigor and Relationships in Collaborative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 544–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkness, Verna J., and Ray Barnhardt. 1991. “First Nations and Higher Education: The Four R's—Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility.” Journal of American Indian Education 30 (3): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, Margaret. 2021. Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Lincoln R., Lauren N. Duffy, Mariela Fernandez, Jill Sturts, Joey Gray, and Gwynn M. Powell. 2019. “Getting Started on the Tenure Track: Challenges and Strategies for Success.” SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education 34 (1): 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2019.1589804.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, Luke E. 2005. The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Naomi, and Pamina Firchow. 2021. “Measuring Peace from the Bottom Up with the Pasto Indigenous Group in Nariño, Colombia.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, Anna Mitchell. 2022. “Community Engagement and State Legislative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (3): 568–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majic, Samantha. 2017. “Participating, Observing, Publishing: Lessons from the Field.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (01): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002249.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Medina, Jennifer, and Oregon COVID-19 Farmworker Study. 2022. “Farmworker Voices: Contesting and Renegotiating Essential Status during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Politics, Groups, and Identities, ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, Ankushi, Jill McNew-Birren, and Ashley Nickels. 2024. “The Politics of Expertise: Centering Community Expertise in Political Science.” Politics, Groups, and Identities, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Richard, Elsa Falkenburger, and Priya Saxena. 2015. “Data Walks: An Innovative Way to Share Data with Communities.” Research Report, Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, June C., and Hans C. Buechler. 2016. Ethnographic Collaborations in Latin America: The Effects of Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Omata, Naohiko. 2021. “‘Over-Researched’ and ‘Under-Researched’ Refugee Groups: Exploring the Phenomena, Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 12 (3): 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, Emily J., Michelle Abraczinskas, Catherine Duarte, Ruchika Mathur, Parissa Jahromi Ballard, Lisa Gibbs, Elijah T. Olivas, Marlene Joannie Bewa, and Rima Afifi. 2020. “Youth Participatory Approaches and Health Equity: Conceptualization and Integrative Review.” American Journal of Community Psychology 66 (3-4): 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Sarah E. 2022. “(Dis)Courtesy Bias: “Methodological Cognates,” Data Validity, and Ethics in Violence-Adjacent Research.” Comparative Political Studies 55 (3): 420–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, Eileen, Linda Bartolomei, and Richard Hugman. 2010. “'Stop Stealing Our Stories': The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 2 (2): 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq004.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Kimala. 2020. “The Rewards and Challenges of Creating an Activist-Scholar Research Program.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport, Joanne. 2020. Cowards Don’t Make History: Orlando Fals Borda and the Origins of Participatory Action Research. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. C., P. Levine, R. Lieberman, V. Sinclair-Chapman, and R. M. Smith. 2021. “Preface.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 707–710. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, Veronica, Randy Villegas, Michael Simrak, and Maryann Kwakwa. 2021. “Ethical Complexities of Civically Engaged Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 734–737. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber. 2005. “The Imperialism of Categories: Situating Knowledge in a Globalizing World.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, Sanford, and Brian Caterino, eds. 2006. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shdaimah, Corey, Roland Stahl, and Sanford F. Schram. 2009. “When You Can See the Sky through Your Roof: Policy Analysis from the Bottom Up.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, edited by Edward Schatz, 255–273. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2008. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Rogers. 2020. “What Good Can Political Science Do? From Pluralism to Partnerships.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (1): 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719004250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soedirgo, Jessica, and Aarie Glas. 2020. “Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519002233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears Johnson, C. R., A. E. Kraemer Diaz, and T. A. Arcury. 2016. “Participation Levels in 25 Community-Based Participatory Research Projects.” Health Education Research 31 (5): 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyw033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, Leah. 2019. “Blocking Pipelines, Unsettling Environmental Justice: From Rights of Nature to Responsibility to Territory.” Local Environment 24 (2): 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1536698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thachil, Tariq, and Milan Vaishnav. 2018. “The Strategic and Moral Imperatives of Local Engagement: Reflections on India.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (03): 546–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000434.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Susan. 2021. “Reflexive Openness as Collaborative Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udani, Adriano, and Kirstie Lynn Dobbs. 2021. “The Praxis of Partnership in Civically Engaged Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unidos, Migrantes, Adriano Udani, Maria Torres Wedding, Ángel Flores Fontanez, Sara John, and Allie Seleyman. 2023. “Envisioning a World without Prisons: Group Concept Mapping as a Collective Strategy for Justice and Dignity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco, Marcela. 2023. “Collective Trauma in Indigenous and Black Territories on Colombia’s Pacific Coast: A Framework and Collaborative Approach to Researching Violence.” Territory, Politics, Governance.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, M., A. Ammerman, E. Eng, G. Garlehner, K.N. Lohr, D. Griffith, S. Rhodes, C. Samuel-Hodge, S. Maty, L. Lux, L. Webb, S.F. Sutton, T. Swinson, A. Jackman and L. Whitener. 2004. “Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence.” AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries (99), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, Vesla, Gwen Prowse, and Spencer Piston. 2019. “Too Much Knowledge, too Little Power: An Assessment of Political Knowledge in Highly Policed Communities.” The Journal of Politics 81 (3): 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/703538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, Sarah Marie. 2020. “Sensing Policy: Engaging Affected Communities at the Intersections of Environmental Justice and Decolonial Futures.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora, and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. 2008. “Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy: Issues in Implementation and Field Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (3): 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508080864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar