Gender and public perceptions of judges who refuse to recuse

References

• Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Anderson. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffan Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badas, Alex, and Katelyn E. Stauffer. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniamin, Hasan Muhammad, and Ishtiaq Jamil. 2022. “Women’s Representation and Implications for Fairness, Trust, and Performance in Local Government: A Survey Experiment in Sri Lanka.” Political Research Quarterly 75 (4): 1229–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211009300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., and Emily Beaulieu. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender 10 (03): 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., and Emily Beaulieu. 2019. “Women Politicians, Institutions, and Perceptions of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (1): 134–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., Emily Beaulieu, and Gregory W. Saxton. 2018. “Restoring Trust in the Police: Why Female Officers Reduce Suspicions of Corruption.” Governance 31 (1): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., and Mark P. Jones. 2018. “Women’s Representation in Argentine National and Subnational Governments.” In Women, Representation, and Politics in Latin America, edited by Leslie Schwindt-Bayer, 121–139. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basinger, Scott J. 2013. “Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912451144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.992794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” The Journal of Politics 68 (3): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00455.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan, and Lee Epstein. 2005. “Recusals and ‘Problem’ of an Equally Divided Supreme Court.” The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 7 (1): 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L., Paul M. Collins, and Lori A. Ringhand. 2023. Supreme Bias: Gender and Race in U.S. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, Charles S., Susan A. MacManus, Karen Padgett Owen, Corttney C. Penberthy, Ralph O. Reid, and Brian McPhee. 2014. ““Your Honor” is a Female: A Multistage Electoral Analysis of Women’s Successes at Securing Trial Court Judgeships.” Social Science Quarterly 95 (5): 1322–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, Damon M. 2007. “Justice for Sale? Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisionmaking.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (3): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, Damon M., Chris W. Bonneau, and Brent D. Boyea. 2012. “Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections.” In New Directions in Judicial Politics, edited by Kevin T. McGuide, 38–52. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cann, Damon M., and Jeff Yates. 2008. “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support for State Courts.” American Politics Research 36 (2): 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07308737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, Amanda, Diana Z. O’Brien, and Jennifer M. Piscopo. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, Devan. 2023. “2 Supreme Court Justices Didn’t Recuse Themselves in Cases Involving Their Book Publisher.” CNN, May 5. https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/04/politics/sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-book-recusal-supreme-court-cases/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Shana Kushner Gadarian, and Jessica Trounstine. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1031803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, David, Conor M. Dowling, and Michael G. Miller. 2011. “Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 49–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, David, Conor M. Dowling, and Michael G. Miller. 2014. “Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (02): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000213.
   Google Scholar
• Durkee, Alison. 2021. “Amy Coney Barrett Rebuffs Demands to Recuse from Dark Money Case Involving Group That Supported Her Confirmation.” Forbes, April 26. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/04/26/amy-coney-barrett-rebuffs-demands-to-recuse-from-dark-money-case-involving-group-that-supported-her-confirmation/?sh=79922ceb3171.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, Alice H., Chrisa Nater, David I. Miller, Michèle Kauffman, and Sabine Sczesny. 2020. “Gender Stereotypes Have Changed: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of U.S. Public Opinion Polls from 1946 to 2018.” American Psychologist 75 (3): 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, Andrew C., Nick Vivyan, and Markus Wagner. 2018. “Corruption, Accountability, and Gender: Do Female Politicians Face Higher Standards in Public Life?” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1086/694649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, Naomi. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Psychology 69 (1): 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esarey, Justin, and Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer. 2018. “Women’s Representation, Accountability, and Corruption in Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 659–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugenis, Kate. 2021. “A Harder Longer Process? Dispelling Myths About Women in Judicial Primary Elections.” Justice System Journal 42 (3-4): 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2021.1902438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Zoe M. Oxley. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” The Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, Brian, and Matthew J. Streb. 2008. “Women Running for Judge: The Impact of Sex on Candidate Success in State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (4): 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00592.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, Kim L., and Patrick J. Kenney. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 5 (03): 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990158.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, Carolyn L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498658.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2012. “Campaign Support, Conflicts of Interest, and Judicial Impartiality: Can Recusals Rescue the Legitimacy of Courts?” The Journal of Politics 74 (1): 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2013. “Judicial Impartiality, Campaign Contributions, and Recusals: Results from a National Survey.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (1): 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeiria, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003a. “Measuring Attitudes Toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeiria, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003b. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33 (4): 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rebecca D. 2014. “Implicit Bias in Judicial Performance Evaluations: We Must Do Better Than This.” Justice System Journal 35 (3): 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2013.873290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rebecca D., and Kate Eugenis. 2019. “Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19 (4): 399–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440019847771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rebecca D., Sylvia R. Lazos, and Mallory M. Waters. 2011. “Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada.” Law & Society Review 45 (3): 731–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00449.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Shane A. 2020. “Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (3): 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919847001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Shane A., Jennifer J. Jones, and Jessica Rae McBean. 2019. “The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision-Making at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Case of Male and Female Justices.” American Politics Research 47 (3): 494–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18766466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, James V., Coulter Jones, and Joe Palazzolo. 2021. “131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest.” Wall Street Journal, September 28. https://www.wsj.com/articles/131-federal-judges-broke-the-law-by-hearing-cases-where-they-had-a-financial-interest-11632834421#.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, Elizabeth L., Kay Deaux, and Nicole Lofaro. 2016. “The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (3): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentschel, Tanja, Madeline E. Heilman, and Claudia V. Peus. 2019. “The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, Robert J. 2014. “Deciding Not to Decide: The Politics of Recusals on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Law & Society Review 48 (3): 621–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 54 (2): 497–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasno, Jonathan S., Donald P. Green, Costas Panagopoulos, Dane Thorley, and Michael Schwam-Baird. 2021. “Campaign Donations, Judicial Recusal, and Disclosure: A Field Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1844–1850. https://doi.org/10.1086/715069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewson, Christopher, and Jean Reith Schroedel. 2023. “The Gender Gap in Supreme Court Legitimacy.” American Politics Research 51 (6): 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X231168353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Claire, Rorie Solberg, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2022. “See Jane Judge: Descriptive Representation and Diffuse Support for a State Supreme Court.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 10 (4): 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1864651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, Mark Stephen. 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Influence.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9101900206.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, Gabriel S., and Alexander Sahn. 2021. “Achieving Statistical Significance with Control Variables and without Transparency.” Political Analysis 29:356–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Jacob M., Brendan Nyhan, and Michelle Torres. 2018. “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do About It.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark, Adam J., Shannon K. Vaughan, and Giovanny D. Pleites-Hernandez. 2019. “Surviving Political Scandals: Why Some Transgressions End Political Careers and Others Do Not.” Social Science Quarterly 100 (4): 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Tony. 2019. “Why Women Win: Gender and Success in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Politics Research 47 (3): 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18788043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, Yoshikuni, and Michael A. Zilis. 2022. “Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges Can Be Impartial.” American Journal of Political Science 66 (1): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. “Women and Leadership: Public Says Women are Equally Qualified, but Barriers Persist.” Accessed December 12, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/01/14/women-and-leadership/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenwasser, Shirley M., Robyn R. Rogers, Shelia Fling, Kayla Silvers-Pickens, and John Butemeyer. 1987. “Attitudes Toward Women and Men in Politics: Perceived Male and Female Candidate Competencies and Participant Personality Characteristics.” Political Psychology 8 (2): 191–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2023. “Do Scandals Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 76 (4): 1932–1943. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231185532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3 (1/2): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791285.
   Google Scholar
• Scheb, I. I., M. John, and William Lyons. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (4): 928–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonfeld, Zach. 2023. “Thomas, Alito Go on the Attack over Supreme Court Ethics.” The Hill, August 31. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4181847-thomas-alito-go-on-the-attack-over-supreme-court-ethics/.
   Google Scholar
• Schönhage, Nanna Lauritz, and Benny Geys. 2023. “Politicians and Scandals That Damage the Party Brand.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Maya. 2014. “How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates.” Journal of Law and Courts 2 (1): 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/674579.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Maya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (2): 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917695229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortell, Christopher, and Melody E. Valdini. 2022. “The Politics of Women’s Presence on High Courts: Bias and the Conditional Nature of Cultivating Legitimacy.” Politics & Gender 18 (3): 858–877. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steussy, Lauren. 2023. “Clarence Thomas Didn’t Recuse Himself from a 2004 Appeal Tied to Harlan Crow’s Family Business, per Bloomberg.” Business Insider, April 24. https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-didnt-recuse-case-involving-harlan-crow-bloomberg-2023-4.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel, and Rodrigo Praino. 2019. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Do Attractive Politicians Get a ‘Break’ When They are Involved in Scandals?” Political Behavior 41 (3): 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9469-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totenberg, Nina. 2021. “Democrats Ask Justice Barrett to Recuse In Case Involving Nonprofit Donor Privacy.” NPR, April 22. https://www.npr.org/2021/04/22/989595589/democrats-ask-justice-barrett-to-recuse-in-case-involving-nonprofit-donor-privac.
   Google Scholar
• Valdini, Melody E. 2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, David, and Amy Moreland. 2014. “Perceptions of Corruption and the Dynamics of Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 10 (03): 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000233.
   Google Scholar
• Wolksy, Adam D. 2023. “Scandal, Hypocrisy, and Resignation: How Partisanship Shapes Evaluations of Politicians’ Transgressions.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 9:74–87.
   Google Scholar