(De)constructing organizational boundaries of university administrations: changing profiles of administrative leadership at German universities

References

• Archer, L. 2008. “Younger Academics’ Constructions of ‘Authenticity’, ‘Success’ and Professional identity.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (4): 385–403. doi: 10.1080/03075070802211729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battis, U. 2009. “Das Amt des Universitätskanzlers: Ein Auslaufmodell?” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 62 (13): 518–522.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., and M. Kogan. 2007. “Organization and Governance of Universities.” Higher Education Policy 20: 477–493. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., and S. Lange. 2010. “Competition and Leadership as Drivers in German and Norwegian University Reforms.” Higher Education Policy 23 (2): 173–193. doi: 10.1057/hep.2010.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümel, A. 2015. Von der Hochschulverwaltung zum Hochschulmanagement Wandel der Hochschulorganisation am Beispiel der Verwaltungsleitung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bogumil, J., M. Burgi, and R. Heinze. 2013. Modernisierung der Universitäten. Umsetzungsstand und Wirkungen neuer Steuerungsinstrumente. Berlin: edition sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Bornhak, C. 1900. Geschichte der deutschen Universitätsverwaltung. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D., and F. -X. Merrien. 1999. “Governance of Universities and Modernization of the State: Analytical Aspects.” In Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities. A Comparative View, edited by D. Braun and F. Merrien, 9–33. London: J. Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Breitbach, M. 2005. “Kurator, Kanzler, Vizepräsident-ein deutscher Irrweg?” In Die janusköpfige Rechtsnatur der Universität - ein deutscher Irrweg?, Symposium für den Kanzler a. D. der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Georg Sandberger. Wissenschaftsrecht 38, Beiheft 15, edited by J. Heß and D. Leuze, 119–139. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. “Constructing Organisations: The Example of the Public Sector Reform.” Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746. doi: 10.1177/0170840600214003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. 1983. The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25. doi: 10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, C., R. DeAngelis, H. De Boer, J. Huisman, and C. Lacotte. 2003. Globalizing Practices and University Responses: European and Anglo-American Differences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., J. Enders, and L. Leisyte. 2007. “Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organisational Transformation of University.” Public Administration 85 (1): 27–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., J. Enders, and U. Schimank. 2008. “Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in Four European countries.” In Governance and Performance of Education Systems, edited by N. Soguel and P. Jaccard, 35–54. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Groof, J., G. Neave, and J. Svec. 1998. Democracy and Governance in Higher Education. Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education and Research. Council of Europe. London: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Derlien, H.-U. 2008. “Die politische und die administrative Elite der Bundesrepublik.” In Regieren zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts, edited by W. Jann and K. König: , 291--328. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, G., J. Meyer, and H. Hwang, Hrsg. 2006. Globalization and Organization. World Society and Organisational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, J., H. de Boer, and E. Weyer. 2013. “Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: The Reform of Higher Education Re-visited.” Higher Education 65 (1): 5–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., C. Musselin, and G. Andresani. 2008. “The Steering of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective.” Higher Education 56 (3): 325–348. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, V. 2010. “Die Kanzlerinnen und Kanzler der Universitäten Deutschlands - Nachwuchssorgen?” Wissenschaftsrecht 43 (3): 279–299. doi: 10.1628/094802110793270494
   Google Scholar
• Füssel, H., and A. Wolter. 2013. “Germany.” In Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, edited by Ch. Russo, 121–133. Lanham, MD: Rowmann & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., and C. R. Hinings. 1996. “Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism.” Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 1022–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmer, M. 2004. Das Binnenrecht der Hochschule. In Hochschulrecht. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis, edited by M. Hartmer and H. Detmer, 167–203. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. 2005. “Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Policy Environment.” Higher education 49 (1–2): 155–176. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heß, J. 2000. “Die Geschichte des Universitätskanzlers im Spannungsfeld zwischen Staatsaufsicht und Hochschulautonomie.” Wissenschaftsrecht 33: 332–342.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, J., and J. Neyses. 2007. “Die Rolle des Universitätskanzlers nach dem neuen Hochschulgesetz (HG NRW).” Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Staat der Gegenwart. Festschrift für Tettinger, 431–447.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmer, M. 2004. “Das Binnenrecht der Hochschule.” In Hochschulrecht. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis, edited by M. Hartmer and H. Detmer, 167–203. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, O. 2010. Von der Kollegialität zur Hierarchie? Der New Managerialism in den Landeshochschulgesetzen. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, O., and G. Krücken. 2013. “Hierarchy and Power. A Conceptual Analysis with Particular Reference to New Public Management Reforms in German Universities.” European Journal of Higher Education 3 (1): 307–323. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2013.850920
   Google Scholar
• Kahl, W. 2004. Hochschule und Staat – Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Betrachtungen eines schwierigen Rechtsverhältnisses unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Aufsichtsfragen. Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, Alfred. 1989. “Organizational, Institutional, and Societal Evolution: Medieval Craft Guilds and the Genesis of Formal Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (4): 540–564. doi: 10.2307/2393566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauff, M. 2005. “Die Präsidialverfassung nach dem nordrhein-westfälischen Hochschulgesetz: ein Alternativmodell?” Wissenschaftsrecht 38 (3): 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, G., and F. Meier. 2006. “Turning the University into an Organisational Actor.” In Globalization and Organization, edited by G. Drori, J. Meyer, and H. Hwang, 241–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, S., and U. Schimank. 2007. “Zwischen Konvergenz und Pfadabhängigkeit: New Public Management in den Hochschulsystemen fünf ausgewählter OECD-Länder.” In Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken, edited by K. Holzinger, H. Jörgen, and C. Knill, 522–548. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. 2015. “Changing Academic Identities in the Context of a Managerial University–Bridging the Duality Between Professions and Organizations. Evidence from the U.S. and Europe.” Evidence from the U.S. and Europe.” In The Relevance of Academic Work in Comparative Perspective, edited by K. William and U. Teichler, 59–73. Dordrecht: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Leuze, D. 2005. “Das Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Körperschaft und staatlicher Einrichtung im Wandel der Hochschulgesetzgebung.” In Die Janusköpfige Rechtsnatur, der Universität-Ein deutscher Irrweg? edited by J. Heß and D. Leuze, 56–68. Wissenschaftsrecht, 2005, Beiheft 15.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, K. 1984. “Die Stellung des Kanzlers an den wissenschaftlichen Hochschulen.” Wissenschaftsrecht 17: 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1979. “The Professional Bureaucracy.” Reprint In Organization & Governance in Higher Education (2010), edited by C. Brown, J. Lane, and E. M. Zamani-Gallaher, 54–73. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Musselin, C. 2007. “Are Universities Specific Organisations?” In Towards a Multiversity? Universities Between Global Trends and National Traditions, edited by G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, and M. Torka, 63–86. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. 1988. “The Making of the Executive Head: The Process of Defining Institutional Leaders in Certain European Countries.” International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 12 (1): 104–114.
   Google Scholar
• Oldiges, M. 1993. “Hochschulleitung und Hochschulverwaltung.” In Festschrift für Werner Thieme zum 70, edited by B. Becker and O. Seewald, 647–669. Köln: Geburtstag.
   Google Scholar
• Paradeise, C., E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, and E. Ferlie, Hrsg. 2009. University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1979. Complex Organization. A Critical Essay. Glenview: Scott, Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pleyer, K. 1955. Die Vermögens- und Personalverwaltung der deutschen Universitäten. Marburg: Elwert Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. 2006. “The Rationalization of Universities.” In Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by M. –L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 225–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F., and T. Christensen. 2013. “The Formalization of the University: Rules, Roots, and Routes.” Higher Education 65: 695–708. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9571-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reale, E., and G. Marini. 2014. “ The Transformative Power of Research Evaluation: Effects on University Governance and Practices.” Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference 2014, Glasgow, September 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, F., and K. Eisenhardt. 2005. “Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization.” Organization Science 16 (5): 491–508. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, H. J. 1996. “Leitungsorganisation.” In Handbuch des Wissenschaftsrechts 1996 Bd.1, edited by C. u.a. Flämig, 839–858.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard. 1992. Organisations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., B. Lepori, M. Montauti, J. Enders, H. de Boer, E. Weyer, and E. Reale. 2015. “ European Universities as Complete Organizations? Understanding Identity, Hierarchy and Rationality in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 17 (10): 1444–1474. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.943268.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. 1994. Wissenschaft, Universität, Profession. Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt a.M: SuhrkampScott 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, W. 1996. “Organisationsstrukturen der Hochschulen.” In Handbuch des Wissenschaftsrechts 1, edited byC. Flämig, O. Kimminich, H. Krüger, E.-J. Meusel H.-H. Rupp D. Scheven, H. J. Schuster, and F. Graf Stenbock-Fermor, 813–838. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organization in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGrawn-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerath, M. 2004. “Der Universitätskanzler in der Hochschulleitung.” Wissenschaftsrecht 37: 203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, E. 2012. “ From Loosely Organised to Tightly Managed? Evidence from the Analysis of Research Evaluation Processes in the UK and the Netherlands.” Paper presented at 28th EGOS-Kolloquium in Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 2012. “Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood.” Minerva 50 (4): 493–510. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9215-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkesmann, U. 2015. “Imaginary Contradictions of University Governance.” In Incentives and Performance. Governance of Research Organizations, edited by I. M. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, and M. Osterloh, 189–205. Dordrecht: Springer International.
   Google Scholar