Thinking about leaving an academic career: gender differences across career stages

References

• Abramo, G., D. W. Aksnes, and C. A. D’Angelo 2021. “Gender Differences in Research Performance Within and Between Countries: Italy vs Norway.” Journal of Informetrics 15 (2), doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, S. A. 2013. “Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited.” BioScience 63 (1): 43–48. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvaja, M. 2018. “Tensions and Striving for Coherence in an Academic’s Professional Identity Work.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (3): 291–306. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1379483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B., and J. Goode. 2001. “The Contradiction of the Myth of Individual Merit, and the Reality of a Patriarchal Support System in Academic Careers.” European Journal of Women's Studies 8 (2): 161–180. doi:10.1177/135050680100800203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhuizen, N., and S. Rothmann. 2008. “Occupational Stress of Academic Staff in South African Higher Education Institutions.” South African Journal of Psychology 38 (2): 321–336. doi:10.1177/008124630803800205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. L. B., M. O. Agago, and W. T. Coombs 1998. “Effects of job-Related Stress on Faculty Intention to Leave Academia.” Research in Higher Education 39 (4): 457–469. doi:10.1023/A:1018741404199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. 2006. “The Segmentation of Academic Labour: A Canadian Example.” ACME: An International E-Journal for CriticalGeographies 4 (2): 228–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 1998. “Peer Review and Panel Decisions in the Assessment of Australian Research Council Project Grant Applicants: What Counts in a Highly Competitive Context.” Higher Education 35: 435–452. doi:10.1023/A:1003118502318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., et al. 2013. “Academic Job Satisfaction from an International Comparative Perspective.” In Job Satisfaction Around the Academic World, edited by P. J. Bentley, H. Coates, I. R. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, and V. Lyn Meek, 239–262. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. ZONE BOOKS.
   Google Scholar
• Callister, R. R. 2006. “The Impact of Gender and Department Climate on Job Satisfaction and Intentions to Quit for Faculty in Science and Engineering Fields.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (3): 367–375. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-7208-y.
   Google Scholar
• Cidlinská, K., N. Fárová, H. Maříková, E. Szénássy. 2018. Akademici a Akademičky 2017: Zpráva z Kvalitativní Studie Veřejných Akademických a Výzkumných Pracovišť. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Cidlinská, K. 2019. “How not to Scare off Women: Different Needs of Female Early-Stage Researchers in STEM and SSH Fields and the Implications for Support Measures.” Higher Education 78 (2): 365–388. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidlinská, K., and M. Vohlídalová. 2017. “Gloomy Prospects of Czech Academic Science: Who Gets Lost and why?” In Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia, edited by M. Vohlídalová and M. Linková, 314–344. Prague: SLON.
   Google Scholar
• Clance, P. R., D. Dingman, S. L. Reviere, and D. R. Stober. 1995. “Impostor Phenomenon in an Interpersonal/Social Context.” Women & Therapy 16 (4): 79–96. doi:10.1300/J015v16n04_07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R., and N. Steffen-Fluhr. 2019. “Hidden Patterns.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 38 (2): 265–282. doi:10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0183.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office (CZSO). 2020. “Kolik bylo v roce 2018 výzkumníků na vysokých školách a v Akademii věd?” Accessed 22 June, 2022, https://www.statistikaamy.cz/2020/01/28/kolik-bylo-v-roce-2018-vyzkumniku-na-vysokych-skolach-a-v-akademii-ved/.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, J. R., and C.-J. Daly. 2006. “Greener Pastures: Faculty Turnover Intent in Urban Public Universities.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (5): 776–803. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paola, N. 2021. “Pathways to Academic Entrepreneurship: The Determinants of Female Scholars’ Entrepreneurial Intentions.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 46 (5): 1417–1441. doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09824-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donowitz, M., G. Germino, F. Cominelli, J. M. Anderson. 2007. “The Attrition of Young Physician-Scientists: Problems and Potential Solutions.” Gastroenterology 132: 477–480. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Pereira, M. 2016. “Struggling Within and Beyond the Performative University: Articulating Activism and Work in an “Academia Without Walls.” Women's Studies International Forum 54: 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagan, M. K., A. J. Jaeger, A. Grantham. 2015. “Supporting the Academic Majority: Policies and Practices Related to Part-Time Faculty's Job Satisfaction.” Higher Education 86 (3): 448–483. doi:10.1080/00221546.2015.11777371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2019. “She figures.” Accessed 22 June, 2022 https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/she-figures-2018_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation (ESF). 2017. “Career Tracking Survey of Doctorate Holders. Project Report.”
   Google Scholar
• Fang, D., and L. Zhan. 2021. “Completion and Attrition of Nursing PhD Students of the 2001 to 2010 Matriculating Cohorts.” Nursing Outlook 69 (3): 340–349. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2020.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• File, J., et al. 2006. Czech Republic Country Note: OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education. Prague: Centre for Higher Education Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2009. “Student and Faculty Attributions of Attrition in High and low-Completing Doctoral Programs in the United States.” Higher Education 58 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gender and Science. 2020. Postavení žen v české vědě. Monitorovací Zpráva za rok 2018. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Accessed 6 February, 2022 https://genderaveda.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Postaveni-zen-v-ceske-vede-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and S. Shibayama. 2014. Moving out of Academic Research: Why Scientists Stop Doing Research? GraSPP Working Paper Series. University of Tokyo. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2743162.
   Google Scholar
• Ginther, D. K., and S. Kahn. 2004. “Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 193–214. doi:10.1257/0895330042162386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, L. S. 1996. “Wage Equity and Female Faculty job Satisfaction: The Role of Wage Differentials in a job Satisfaction Causal Model.” Research in Higher Education 37 (5): 569–598. doi:10.1007/BF01724939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., E. de Weert, J. Bartelse. 2002. “Academic Careers from a European Perspective: The Declining Desirability of the Faculty Position.” Higher Education 73 (1): 141–160. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, K. H., and K. Devine. 2016. “Doctoral Students’ Emotional Exhaustion and Intentions to Leave Academia.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 035–061. doi:10.28945/3396.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L., and S. de Cheveigné. 2010. “Gender and Gatekeeping of Excellence in Research Funding: European Perspectives.” In In Gender Change in Academia. Re-Mapping the Fields of Work, Knowledge, and Politics from a Gender Perspective, edited by B. Riegraf, B. Aulenbacher, E. Kirsch-Auwärter, and U. Müller, 43–59. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L., and V. Rosser. 2002. “Faculty Members’ Morale and Their Intention to Leave: A Multilevel Explanation.” Higher Education 73 (4): 518–542. doi:10.1080/00221546.2002.11777162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, R. B., F. Lin, D. E. Kern, S. M. Wright, and J. Carrese 2011. “Stories from Early-Career Women Physicians Who Have Left Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Study at a Single Institution.” Academic Medicine 86 (6): 752–758. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e83b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linková, M. 2017. “The Czech Research Landscape: Shifts in Research Organization After 1989.” In Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia, edited by M. Vohlídalová and M. Linková, 69–92. Prague: SLON.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., P. D. Allison, and R. McGinnis 1993. “Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity.” American Sociological Review 58: 703–722. doi:10.2307/2096282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E., and C. Nelson. 2000. “The Hidden Crisis in Graduate Education: Attrition from Ph.D. Programs.” Academe 86 (6): 44–50. doi:10.2307/40251951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manger, T., and O. Eikeland. 1990. “Factors Predicting Staff's Intentions to Leave the University.” Higher Education 19 (3): 281–291. doi:10.1007/BF00133893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matier, M. W. 1990. “Retaining Faculty: A Tale of two Campuses.” Research in Higher Education 31 (1): 39–60. doi:10.1007/BF00992556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. 1988. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.” Isis 79 (4): 606–623. doi:10.1086/354848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 2016. “Troubling Intra-Actions: Gender, Neo-Liberalism and Research in the Global Academy.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1062919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudrák, J., et al. 2020. “A Self-Determined Profession? Perceived Work Conditions and the Satisfaction Paradox among Czech Academic Faculty.” Sociologický Časopis/Czech Sociological Review 56 (3): 387–418. doi:10.13060/csr.2020.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1997. Retirement and Other Departure Plans of Instructional Faculty and Staff in Higher Education Institutions (NCES 98-254). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2001. Institutional Policies and Practices: Results from the 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, Institution Survey (NCES 2001-201). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K., and K. P. Hapgood. 2012. “The Academic Jungle: Ecosystem Modelling Reveals why Women are Driven out of Research.” Oikos 121 (7): 999–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20601.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okpara, J. O., et al. 2005. “Gender Differences and job Satisfaction: A Study of University Teachers in the United States.” Women in Management Review 20 (3): 177–190. doi:10.1108/09649420510591852.
   Google Scholar
• Pietilä, M., I. Drange, C. Silander, and A. Vabø 2021. “Gender and Globalization of Academic Labor Markets: Research and Teaching Staff at Nordic Universities.” Social Inclusion 9 (3): 69–80. doi:10.17645/si.v9i3.4131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, A. E. 2004. Leaving Science: Occupational Exit from Scientific Careers. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. 2004. “Faculty Members' Intentions to Leave: A National Study on Their Worklife and Satisfaction.” Research in Higher Education 45 (3): 285–309. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019591.74425.f1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. J., and B. K. Townsend. 2006. “Determining Public 2-Year College Faculty's Intent to Leave: An Empirical Model.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (1): 124–147. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, M. W. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–341. doi:10.1177/030631293023002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothblum, E. D. 1988. “Leaving the Ivory Tower: Factors Contributing to Women's Voluntary Resignation from Academia.” Frontiers: Journal of Women Studies 10 (2): 14–17. doi:10.2307/3346465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSC. 2002. Recruitment and Retention of Women in Academic Chemistry. Accessed 6 February, 2022 https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/02-about-us/our-strategy/diversity-community-hub/2002-recruitment-and-retention-of-women-in-academic-chemistry_tcm18-12807.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• RSC. 2008. The Molecular Bioscience PhD and Women’s Retention: A Survey and Comparison with Chemistry. Accessed 6 February, 2022 https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/02-about-us/our-strategy/diversity-community-hub/2009-molecular-bioscience-phd-and-womens-retention.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. F., R. Healy, and J. Sullivan 2012. “Oh, Won’t you Stay? Predictors of Faculty Intent to Leave a Public Research University.” Higher Education 63 (4): 421–437. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9448-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silander, C., U. Haake, and L. Lindberg 2013. “The Different Worlds of Academia: A Horizontal Analysis of Gender Equality in Swedish Higher Education.” Higher Education 66 (2): 173–188. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9597-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silander, C., U. Haake L. Lindberg, and U. Riis 2022. “Nordic Research on Gender Equality in Academic Careers: A Literature Review.” European Journal of Higher Education 12 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1080/21568235.2021.1895858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šima, K., and P. Pabian. 2017. “Higher Education Policy Context.” In In Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia, edited by M. Vohlídalová and M. Linková, 93–118. Prague: SLON.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. C. 1990. “A Causal Model of Faculty Turnover Intentions.” Research in Higher Education 31 (5): 405–424. doi:10.1007/BF00992710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S., and A. M. Takahashi. 2009. “Gender Promotion Differences in Economics Departments In Japan: A Duration Analysis.” GSIR Working Papers, EAP09-4.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, K. W., and A. M. Gloria. 2019. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Impostorism in STEM Persistence.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43 (2): 151–164. doi:10.1177/0361684318802333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelken, C., and R. Deem. 2013. “All are Equal, but Some are More Equal Than Others: Managerialism and Gender Equality in Higher Education in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Education 49 (4): 520–535. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.807642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., and A. Davies. 2002. “Gender and New Public Management: Reconstituting Academic Subjectivities.” Gender, Work & Organization 9 (4): 372–397. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00165.
   Google Scholar
• Trix, F., and C. Psenka. 2003. “Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty.” Discourse & Society 14 (2): 191–220. doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. “Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs.” Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society 19 (4): 507–524. doi:10.1177/1350508411414293.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2014. “Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (3): 460–492. doi:10.1111/joms.12060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weijden, I., C. Teelken, M. de Boer, and M. Drost. 2016. “Career Satisfaction of Postdoctoral Researchers in Relation to Their Expectations for the Future.” Higher Education 72 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9936-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohlídalová, M. 2018. Akademici a Akademičky 2017: Zpráva z Dotazníkového šetření Akademických a Vědeckých Pracovnic a Pracovníků ve Veřejném Sektoru. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Accessed by 22 June, 2022 https://genderaveda.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Vohlidalova_akademici2017_FINAL_2_8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vohlídalová, M. 2021a. “Early-Career Women Academics: Between Neoliberalism and Gender Conservatism.” Sociological Research Online 26 (1): 27–43. doi:10.1177/1360780420914468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohlídalová, M. 2021b. “The Segmentation of the Academic Labour Market and Gender, Field, and Institutional Inequalities.” Social Inclusion 9 (3): 163–174. doi:10.17645/si.v9i3.4190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., and P. O'Connor. 2017. Gendered Success in Higher Education: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, N. H., M. A. Mason, and M. Goulden 2009. “Stay in the Game: Gender, Family Formation and Alternative Trajectories in the Academic Life Course.” Social Forces 87 (3): 1591–1621. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. 2008. “Gender Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions.” Research in Higher Education 49 (7): 607–624. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zábrodská, K., Jiří Mudrák, Petr Kveton, Kateřina Machovcová, Marek Blatný, and Iva Šolcová 2017. “Satisfied but not Equal: Working Conditions of Women and men Faculty in Czech Universities.” In Gender and Neoliberalism in Czech Academia, edited by M. Vohlídalová and M. Linková, 227–313. Prague: SLON.
   Google Scholar
• Zábrodská, K., J. Mudrák, I. Šolcová, P. Květon, M. Blatný, and K. Machovcová 2018. “Burnout among University Faculty: The Central Role of Work–Family Conflict.” Educational Psychology 38 (6): 800–819. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1340590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., and J. F. Volkwein. 2004. “Examining the Influences on Faculty Departure Intentions: A Comparison of Tenured Versus Nontenured Faculty at Research Universities Using NSOPF-99.” Research in Higher Education 45 (2): 139–176. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015693.38603.4c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H., Jonathan R. Cole, John T. Bruer, eds. 1991. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar