193
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Tuition fees for international students: a policy instrument of cost sharing and control or simply income generation

ORCID Icon
Received 05 Feb 2024, Accepted 06 May 2024, Published online: 05 Jun 2024

References

  • Agasisti, T., and G. Catalano. 2006. “Governance Models of University Systems – Towards Quasi-Markets? Tendencies and Perspectives: A European Comparison.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28 (3): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800600980056
  • Altbach, P., and H. de Wit. 2023. “When HE Internationalisation Operates as an Industry.” University World News. 11 April 2023.
  • Bertolin, J. C. G. 2011. “The Quasi-Markets in Higher Education: From the Improbable Perfectly Competitive Markets to the Unavoidable State Regulation.” Educação e Pesquisa 37 (2): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022011000200002
  • Bryntesson, A. 2018. Det svenska studieavgiftssystemets ekonomiska logik. En kritisk diskussion. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
  • Cannings, J., M. Halterbeck, and G. Conlon. 2023. The Benefits and Costs of International Higher Education Students to the UK Economy. HEPI. United Kingdom. Accessed 05 February 2024, https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3839138/full-report-benefits-and-costs-of-international-students/4645030/.
  • Cantwell, B. 2015. “Are International Students Cash Cows? Examining the Relationship Between New International Undergraduate Enrollments and Institutional Revenue at Public Colleges and Universities in the US.” Journal of international students 5 (4): 512–525. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v5i4.412
  • Clark, B. R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • de Gayardon, A. 2017. “Free Higher Education: Mistaking Equality and Equity.” International Higher Education (91): 12–13. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.91.10127
  • De Wit, H. 2024. “Competing for Students: Global North Gives Up Its Privilege.” University World News 13 January 2024. Accessed 10 April 2024 https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20240110113612397.
  • Docquier, F., and J. Machado. 2016. “Global Competition for Attracting Talents and the World Economy.” The World Economy 39 (4): 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12267
  • Gornitzka, Å, and P. Maassen. 2000. “Hybrid Steering Approaches with Respect to European Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 13 (3): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00012-X
  • HEPI. 2023. UK Higher Education – Policy, Practice and Debate During HEPI’s First 20 Years, Higher Education Policy Institute. United Kingdom. Accessed 05 February 2024 https://policycommons.net/artifacts/4499457/uk-higher-education/5302119/.
  • Howlett, M. 2014. “From the ‘Old’ To the ‘New’ Policy Design: Design Thinking Beyond Markets and Collaborative Governance.” Policy Sciences 47 (3): 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
  • Johnstone, D. B. 2004. “The Economics and Politics of Cost Sharing in Higher Education: Comparative Perspectives.” Economics of Education Review 23 (4): 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.09.004
  • Johnstone, D. B., and P. N. Marcucci. 2010. Financing Higher Education Worldwide: Who Pays? Who Should Pay? Baltimore: JHU Press.
  • Jongbloed, B. 2004. “Funding Higher Education: Options, Trade-Offs and Dilemmas.” Paper presented at the Fulbright Brainstorms 2004 – New Trends in Higher Education.
  • Jungblut, J., and M. Vukasovic. 2013. “And Now for Something Completely Different? Re-examining Hybrid Steering Approaches in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 26 (4): 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2013.28
  • Kauko, J., and A. Medvedeva. 2016. “Internationalisation as Marketisation? Tuition Fees for International Students in Finland.” Research in Comparative and International Education 11 (1): 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631061
  • Knight, J. 2013. “The Changing Landscape of Higher Education Internationalisation – for Better or Worse?” Perspectives: Policy and practice in higher education 17 (3): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2012.753957
  • Lascoumes, P., and P. Le Galès. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy Through its Instruments – from the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance 20 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
  • Liu, D., and M. C. Solheim. 2023. “Tuition Fees for International Students in Norway: A Policy-Debate.” Beijing International Review of Education 5 (3): 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1163/25902539-05030005
  • Lomer, S. 2017. “Soft Power as a Policy Rationale for International Education in the UK: A Critical Analysis.” Higher Education 74 (4): 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0060-6
  • Lundin, H., and L. Geschwind. 2023. “Exploring Tuition Fees as a Policy Instrument of Internationalisation in a Welfare State – the Case of Sweden.” European Journal of Higher Education13 (1): 1–19.
  • Lunt, I. 2008. “Beyond Tuition Fees? The Legacy of Blair’s Government to Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (6): 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980802519001
  • Marcucci, P. N., and D. B. Johnstone. 2007. “Tuition Fee Policies in a Comparative Perspective: Theoretical and Political Rationales.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 29 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800600980015
  • Marginson, S. 2011. “Higher Education and Public Good.” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (4): 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x
  • Ministry of Education. 2022. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2022:3. Helsinki.
  • Mintz, B. 2021. “Neoliberalism and the Crisis in Higher Education: The Cost of Ideology.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 80 (1): 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12370
  • Myklebust, J. P. 2023. “Unions Object to ‘Contradictory’ non-EU Student fee Hike.” University World News 7 September 2023. Accessed 10 April 2024: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230907093703656.
  • Naidoo, V., R. Roy, F. K. Rabbanee, and T. Wu. 2022. “Drivers of Tuition Fee Setting Practices for Higher Education Institutions Involved in International Student Recruitment.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2076274
  • Nilsson, P. A., and L. Westin. 2022. “Ten Years After. Reflections on the Introduction of Tuition Fees for Some International Students in Swedish Post-Secondary Education.” Education Inquiry, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2137912
  • Nordensvärd, J., and M. Ketola. 2019. “Rethinking the Consumer Metaphor Versus the Citizen Metaphor: Frame Merging and Higher Education Reform in Sweden.” Social Policy and Society 18 (4): 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000465
  • Norton, A. 2020. “How Reliant is Australian University Research on International Student Profits?” https://andrewnorton.net.au/2020/05/21/how-reliant-is-australian-university-research-on-international-student-profits/.
  • OECD. 2008. “Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society.” OECD Publishing 1 (2): 23–30.
  • OFS (Office for Students). 2022. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/student-outcomes-data-dashboard/data-dashboard/.
  • Oxford Economics. 2020. Multiplying Economic Value: The Impact of Swedish Universities, Report for SULF. London: Oxford Economics.
  • Paradeise, C., E. Reale, and G. Goastellec. 2009. “A Comparative Approach to Higher Education Reforms in Western European Countries.” In University Governance. Higher Education Dynamics, edited by C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, and E. Ferlie, Vol. 25, 197–225. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Pressman, J. L., and A. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
  • Prop 2009/10:65 (Governmental bill). 2009. Konkurrera med kvalitet – studieavgifter för utländska studenter. Stockholm: Utbildnings- och kulturdeparementet.
  • Reale, E., and M. Seeber. 2013. “Instruments as Empirical Evidence for the Analysis of Higher Education Policies.” Higher Education 65 (1): 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9585-5
  • Rensimer, L., and T. McCowan. 2023. Reconceptualising International Flows of Aid to and through Higher Education. Working paper no. 97. Centre for Global Higher Education Working Paper series.
  • Rickmann, J. 2021. Market Smart, not Market Driven, Organizational Processing at Swedish Universities After the Introduction of Tuition Fees for International non-EU-Students. Milano: Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore.
  • Salancik, G. R., and J. Pfeffer. 1978. “A Social Information Processing Approach to job Attitudes and Task Design.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 23 (2): 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
  • Sanchez-Serra, D., and G. Marconi. 2018. “Increasing International Students’ Tuition Fees: The two Sides of the Coin.” International Higher Education 92: 13–14. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2018.92.10278
  • Seeber, M., M. Cattaneo, J. Huisman, and S. Paleari. 2016. “Why Do Higher Education Institutions Internationalize? An Investigation of the Multilevel Determinants of Internationalization Rationales.” Higher Education 72 (5): 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9971-x
  • Skr 2015/16:48. 2015. Regeringens exportstrategi (Skrivelse Skr 2015/16:48). Stockholm.
  • Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • SOU 2018:78 (Official Reports of the Swedish Government). 2018. Ökad attraktionskraft för kunskapsnationen Sverige. Stockholm.
  • Swedish Institute. 2022. Den ekonomiska effekten av internationella studenter Diarienummer: 10561/2021. Stockholm.
  • Tange, H., and K. Jæger. 2021. “From Bologna to Welfare Nationalism: International Higher Education in Denmark, 2000–2020.” Language and Intercultural Communication 21 (2): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1865392
  • Teixeira, P., B. B. Jongbloed, D. D. Dill, and A. Amaral. 2006. Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (Vol. 6). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Tilak, J. B. 2008. “Higher Education: A Public Good or a Commodity for Trade?” Prospects 38 (4): 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9093-2
  • UKÄ (Universitetskanslerämbetet). 2017. Kartläggning av studieavgifter: Redovisning av ett regeringsuppdrag (Rapport 2017:2). Stockholm.
  • UKÄ (Universitetskanslerämbetet). 2023. Data base. Accessed June 05, 2023. https://www.uka.se/integrationer/hogskolan-i-siffror/statistik?statq=https://statistik-api.uka.se/api/totals/14.
  • Universitetsläraren. 2017. “Utländska studenter betalar mer än vad en svensk student kostar.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://universitetslararen.se/2017/06/21/utlandska-studenter-betalar-mer-an-vad-en-svensk-student-kostar/?hilite=Utl%C3%A4ndska+studenter.
  • Westin, L., and P. A. Nilsson. 2023. “The Swedish Debate on Tuition Fees for International Students in Higher Education.” Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education 12 (2): 281–303.
  • Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.