‘Dispositifs’ of parenting in child welfare work: a cross-cultural study of home-based interventions in child protective services in Norway and France

References

• Andenaes, A. 2005.“Neutral Claims – Gendered Meanings: Parenthood and Developmental Psychology in a Modern Welfare State.” Feminism and Psychology 15 (2): 209–226. 10.1177/0959353505051729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backe-Hansen, E. 2004. God nok omsorg. Riktige beslutninger i barnevernet [Good Enough Care. Right Decisions in Child Protection]. Oslo: Kommune forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bellas-Cabane, C., F. Bourdillon, M. L. Cadart, M. Clément, Y. Coinçon, and J. F. Cottes. 2006. Pas de zéro de conduite pour les enfants de trois ans. Appel en réponse à l’expertise INSERM sur le trouble des conduites chez l’enfant [No Zero of Conduct for Three Years Old. Call in Answer to INSERM’s Expertise on Behavioral Troubles Amongst Children]. http://www.pasde0deconduite.org/appel/
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, J. 2012. “Tendances et typologies des politiques et services de soutien à la parentalité en Europe.” [Trends and Typologies of Parenting Support Policies and Services in Europe.] In Aider les parents à être parents. Le soutien à la parentalité, une perspective internationale [Helping Parents to be Parents. Support for Parenthood, an International Perspective], edited by M.-P. Hamel and S. Lemoine, 65–89. Paris: Rapport du Centre d’Analyse Stratégique.
   Google Scholar
• Born, A. W., and P. H. Jensen. 2010. “Dialogue-based Activation – A New ‘Dispositif’?” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30 (5–6): 326–336. 10.1108/01443331011054271
   Google Scholar
• Bussolini, J. 2010. “What is a Dispositive?” Foucault Studies 10: 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. 2005. “PMTO (Parent-Management Training – Oregonmodellen) – en modell for positivt samspill mellom barn og foreldre.” [PMTO (Parent-Management Training – Oregon model) – A Positive Model for Positive Parent–child Interaction.] In Nye metoder i et moderne barnevern: mangfold og variasjon [New Methods in the Modern Child Protection. Diversity and Variation], edited by L. Schjelderup, C. Omre, and E. Marthinsen, 173–192. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Code de l’Action sociale et des familles [Code of Social Action and Families]. Legifrance. Accessed June 5 2014. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006074069
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. 2013. “Parenting Support Policies in Europe.” Families, Relationships and Societies 2 (2): 159–174. 10.1332/204674313X666886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fablet, D. 2008. L’émergence de la notion de parentalité en milieu(x) professionnel(s) [The Emergence of the Notion of Parenthood in Professional Spheres]. Sociétés et jeunesses en difficulté 5. Accessed June 1 2014. http://sejed.revues.org/3532
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité: Vol. 1: La volonté de savoir [The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1: The will to Knowledge]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004a. Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France 1977–1978 [Security, Territory, Population: Courses at the Collège de France]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004b. Naissance de la biopolitique: cours au collège de France (1978–1979) [The Birth of Biopolitics]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Freymond, N., and G. Cameron. 2006. “Learning from International Comparisons of Child Protection, Family Service and Community Caring Systems of Child and Family Welfare.” In Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare: International Comparisons of Child Protection, Family Services, and Community Caring Systems, edited by N. Freymond and N. Cameron, 289–317. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furedi, F. 2008. Paranoid Parenting. Why Ignoring the Experts May be Best for Your Child. 1st ed., 2001. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. 2011. Mères sous influence: de la cause des femmes à la cause des enfants [Mothers Under influence. From the Advancement of Women to the Advancement of Children Cause]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2006. “Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment.” Theoretical Criminology 10 (4): 419–447. 10.1177/1362480606068873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. 2014. “What is a ‘History of the Present’? On Foucault’s Genealogies and their Critical Preconditions.” Punishment and Society 16 (4): 365–384. 10.1177/1462474514541711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., N. Parton, and M. Skivenes. 2011. “Changing Patterns of Response and Emerging Orientations.” In Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations, edited by N. Gilbert, N. Parton, and M. Skivenes, 243–257. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V. 2012. “Family Policy and the Politics of Parenting: From Function to Competence.” In The Politicization of Parenthood, edited by M. Richter and S. Andresen, 13–26. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-2972-8
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, F. 2009. “Éduquer les parents? Les pratiques de soutien à la parentalité auprès des familles socialement disqualifiées [Educating Parents? Practices of Parenting Support Amongst Socially Disqualified Families].” Revue française de pédagogie 3: 83–92. 10.4000/rfp
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., T. Pösö, C. Smith, S. White, and J. Korpinen. 2004. “What is Child Protection? Historical and Methodological Issues in Comparative Research on Lastensuojelu/Child Protection.” International Journal of Social Welfare 13 (1): 28–41. 10.1111/ijsw.2004.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houzel, D. 2007. Les enjeux de la parentalité [The Stakes of Parenthood]. Paris: Erès.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, S., and F. Maier. 2001. “Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Mayer, 32–62. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Join-Lambert Milova, H., and S. Sohre. 2011. “Key Concepts of Parenting Support in France and Germany.” International Journal of Child and Family Welfare 3 (4): 105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kojan, B. 2013. “Hvordan kan et strukturelt perspektiv med fokus på begreper som klasse og levekår påvirke barnevernstjenestens praksis?” [How Can a Structural Perspective with a Focus on Concepts Such as Class and Living Conditions Influence the Practice of Child Protective Services?] In Det Nye Barnevernet, edited by E. Marthinsen and W. Lichtwarck, 70–84. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish. 2014. Parenting Culture Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137304612
   Google Scholar
• Lov 17. juli 1992 nr. 100 om barneverntjenester (barnevernloven) [Act of 17 July 1992 no 100 Relating to Child Welfare Services (The Child Welfare Act)]. Barne- likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet [Ministry of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion].
   Google Scholar
• Macvarish, J. 2014. “The Politics of Parenting.” In Parenting Culture Studies, edited by E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish, 76–101. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., and G. Llewellyn. 2005. “Social Inequality, ‘The Deviant Parent’ and Child Protection Practice.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 40 (4): 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1): 9–47. 10.1086/ajs.1972.78.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyrand, G. 2011. Soutenir et contrôler les parents [Supporting and Controlling Parents]. Toulouse: Erès.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2000. Barnevernet i Norge [Child Protection in Norway]. Oslo: Barne- og familiedepartementet [Ministry of Children and Family], Vol. 12.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2012. Bedre beskyttelse av barns utvikling [For a Better Protection of Children’s Development]. Oslo: Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet [Ministry of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion], Vol. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Orbuch, T. L. 1997. “People’s Accounts Count: The Sociology of Accounts.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 455–478. 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, H., and P. Charlier. 1999. “Contributions à une théorie du dispositif.” [Contribution to a Theory of the Dispositif.] Hermès 25: 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Picot, A. 2012. “Out-of-home Placements and Notions of Family in Norway and in France.” Sosiologi i dag 42 (3–4): 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pioli, D. 2006. Le soutien à la parentalité: entre émancipation et contrôle [Support for Parenthood: Between Emancipation and Control]. Sociétés et jeunesses en difficulté. Online 1. Accessed June 1 2014. http://sejed.revues.org/106
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T. 2014. “Translation as a Knowledge Transformation Practice – The Ambiguous Case of Presenting Finnish Child Welfare in English.” European Journal of Social Work 17 (5): 616–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. 106 L. (2012–2013). Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak) Endringer i barnevernloven [Act Proposal to the Parliament (Proposal of Resolution) Change in the Child Welfare Law]. Oslo: Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Raffnsøe, S., and M. Gudmand-Høyer. 2005. “Dispositivanalyse–en historisk socialanalytik hos Foucault.” [Dispositif Analysis – A Historical Socio-analysis in Foucault.] In Poststrukturalistiske analysestrategier [Post-structuralist Analytical Strategies], edited by A. Esmark, C. B. Laustsen, and N. Å. Andersen, 153–177. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaekers, S., and J. Suissa. 2011. The Claims of Parenting: Reasons, Responsibility and Society. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sagatun, S. 2011. “Dimensjoner ved omsorg som gis oppmerksomhet i Barnevernsundersøkelsen.” [Dimensions of Care that are Attended to in Child Protection Inquiries.] In Å bli undersøkt: norske og danske foreldres erfaringer med barnevernsundersøkelsen [To be Examined: Norwegian and Danish Parents’ Experiences with Child Welfare Inquiries], edited by K. Kildedal, L. Uggerhøj, S. Nordstoga, and S. Sagatun, 129–142. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Schjelderup, L., C. Omre, and E. Marthinsen. 2005. Nye metoder i et moderne barnevern: mangfold og variasjon [New Methods in the Modern Child protection. Diversity and Variation]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Wærdahl, R. 2010. “Den fremmede.” [The Stranger.] In Metodene våre: eksempler fra samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning [Our Methods: Examples from Social Science Research], edited by D. Album and M. N. Hansen, 235–249. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar