Social skills, New Capitalism, and power in social work

References

• Adams, R., L. Dominelli, and M. Payne. 2009. Critical Practice in Social Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Azaïs, C., A. Corsani, and P. Dieuaide, eds. 2001. Vers Un Capitalisme Cognitif. Entre Mutations Du Travail Et Territoires. [Towards a cognitive capitalism: Between shifts in labour and territories], Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1974. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. London: Heinmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, T. T., M. Fredriksen, and J. E. Larsen, eds. 2015. The Danish Welfare State: A Sociological Investigation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. 1st edn ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2006. “Adapting Employment Policies to Post-Industrial Labour Market Risks”. Working paper de l’IDHEAP jun2006. Chaire Politiques sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2010. “The Political Economy of Active Labour Market Policy “.” Politics & Society 38 (4): 435–457. doi:10.1177/0032329210381235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and L. J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1994. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12 (1): 1–18. doi:10.2307/202032.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1999. “The Abdication of the State.” In The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, by Pierre Bourdieu, et al., 181–199. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2014. On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989–1992. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. 2008. “Selvudvikling Og Kompetencer I Konkurrencestaten. [Self Development and Competences in the Competition State].“ In Psykens Historier I Danmark: Om Forståelsen Og Styringen Af Sjælelive, [The histories of the psyche in Denmark: about the understanding and control of the soul], edited by S. Brinkmann and P. Triantafillous, 189–209. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., L. Eskelinen, and S. P. Olesen. 2011. “Identity Work and Client Resistance Underneath the Canopy of Active Employment Policy.” Qualitative Social Work 12 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1177/1473325011413629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. 1995. The Five Love Languages. Chicago: Northfield Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. 2005. “New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilized, Abandoned?” Critical Social Policy 25 (4): 447–463. doi:10.1177/0261018305057024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1995. “Governing the Unemployed Self in an Active Society.” Economy and Society 24 (4): 559–583. doi:10.1080/03085149500000025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 1996. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2014. “Rethinking Neoliberalism.” Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 150–163. doi:10.1177/1440783312442256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doogan, K. 2009. New Capitalism? the Transformation of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, L., S. P. Olesen, and D. Caswell. 2010. “Client Contribution in Negotiations on Employability – Categories Revised?” International Journal of Social Welfare 19 (1): 330–338. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00717.x.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallov, M. A., M. A. Nissen, J. Kjaerulff, P. Ringø, and R. Birk. 2017. “Social Work Practice and Social Policy Reform – Agents or Activists in the Shaping of Productivity.” In Distinctive Social Work Research, edited by K. Høgsbro and I. Shaw. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields.” Sociological Theory 19 (2): 105–125. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J., and G. A. Askeland. 2007. “Challenges of Critical Reflection: ’Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained’.” Social Work Education 26 (5): 520–533. doi:10.1080/02615470601118662.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by H. L. Dreyfuss and P. Rabinow, 417–432. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garavan, M. 2013. “Dialogical Practice in Social Work – Towards a Renewed Humanistic Method.” Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 22 (1): 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, C., and K. Jacobsson. 2013. “Sorting People in and Out: The Plasticity of Thecategories of Employability, Work Capacity and Disability as Technologies of Government.” Ephemera 13 (4): 825–850.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1989. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18 (2): 123–132. doi:10.1177/089124189018002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., D. Massey, and M. Rustin. 2013. “After Neoliberalism: Analysing the Present.” Soundings – A Journal of Politics and Culture 53: 8–22. doi:10.3898/136266213806045656.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography – Principles in Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., J. E. Larsen, and N. Mortensen, eds. [The powerfull meeting between system and client]. 2003. Det Magtfulde Møde Mellem System Og Klient. Århus: Århus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and J. F. Gubrium, eds. 2014. Turning Troubles into Problem: Clientization in Human Services. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and N. Mik-Meyer, eds. [Creating a client - institutional identities in social work]. 2003. At Skabe En Klient – Institutionelle Identiteter I Socialt Arbejde. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and G. Troman. 2004. “Time for Ethnography.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (4): 535–548. doi:10.1080/0141192042000237220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. Q., and A. Prieur. 2016. “The Commodification of the Personal: Labour Market Demands in the Era of Neoliberal Postindustrialization.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 17 (1): 94–108. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2015.1082922.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. Q., and A. Prieur. 2017. “Doing an Ostrich.” Social Skills, Cultural Capital and the Double Articulation of Social Violence at the Margins of a Scandinavian Welfare State, Paper for Network Seminar Rising Inequalities, Copenhagen 14–15 (Sep): 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, H. 2010. “Cognitive Capitalism or Cognition in Capitalism? A Critique of Cognitive Capitalism Theory.” Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 2 (3): 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S., and H. K. Krogstrup. 2015. Deltagende Observation - Introduktion Til En Forskningsmetodik. [Participant observation – introduction to a research method]. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, J. 2016. ‘We don’t want you to think Criminal thoughts’: A sociological exploration of prison-based Cognitive behavioural programmes in Denmark, PhD Dissertation, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. 1998. Sociological Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L., M. Ungar, and J. Ikeda. 2013. “Neo-Liberalism and Responsibilisation in the Discourse of Social Service Workers.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (3): 1006–1021. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. 1995. “Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 1 (3): 275–289. doi:10.1177/107780049500100301.
   Google Scholar
• Maurizio, L. 2009. “Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social.” Theory, Culture and Society 26 (6): 109–133. doi:10.1177/0263276409350283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N., and K. Villadsen. 2013. Power and the Welfare State: Understanding Citizens’ Encounters with State Welfare. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulier-Boutang, Y. 2011. Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. 2010. Humanistic Social Work: Core Principles in Practice. Chicago: Lyceum.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. 2016. Præstationssamfundet. [The performance society]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Prieur, A., S. Q. Jensen, J. Laursen, and O. Pedersen. 2016. “‘Social Skills’: Following a Travelling Concept from American Academic Discourse to Contemporary Danish Welfare Institutions.” Minerva - A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 54 (4): 423–443.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1990. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarfati, H., and G. Bonoli. 2017. Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C. 1999. “Quality in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 5 (4): 465–478. doi:10.1177/107780049900500402.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character - the Personal Consequence of Work in New Capitalism. New York: W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2006. The Culture of the New Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2002. “Techniques for Telling the Reflexive Self.” In Qualitative Research in Action, edited by T. May, 349–375. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2005. Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstrup, P. S. 2015: Oversigt over sociale projekter med fokus på sociale kompetencer, unpublished research note.
   Google Scholar
• Tønnesvang, J. 2002. Selvet I Pædagogikken. [The self in pedagogy]. Århus: Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K. 2004. Det Sociale Arbejde Som Befrielse [Social Work as Emancipation].“ In At Skabe En Klient – Institutionelle Identiteter I Socialt Arbejde, [Creating a client - institutional identities in social work], edited by M. Järvinen and N. Mik-Meyer, 192–226. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K., and N. Mik-Meyer. 2007. Magtens Former – Sociologiske Perspektiver På Statens Møde Med Borgerne [The Forms of Power – Sociological Perspectives of the Meerin between State and Citizens]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. J. D. 2010. “Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare and the Social Insecurity.” Sociological Forum 25 (2): 197–220. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. J. D. 2012. “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” Social Anthropology 20 (1): 66–79. doi:10.1111/soca.2012.20.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. 1997. “Theoretically Informed Ethnographic Study.” In Anthropology and Cultural Studies, edited by S. Nugent and C. Shore, 182–192. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar