Social work and the management of complexity in Swedish child welfare services

References

• Barnes, C. 2015. “Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t.” In Mothering Justice: Working with Mothers in Criminal and Social Justice Settings, edited by L. Baldwin, 65–88. Hook, UK: Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barter, C., and E. Renold. 1999. “The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research.” Social Research Update 25 (9): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström, L., B. Vinnerljung, H. Forsman, and Y. B. Almquist. 2017. “Children Placed in Out-Of-Home Care as Midlife Adults: Are They Still Disadvantaged or Have They Caught up with Their Peers?” Child Maltreatment 22 (3): 2015–2214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, P. A., and D. G. Mossler. 2002. “Professionals’ Decision-Making about Out-Of-Home Placements following Instances of Child Abuse.” Child Abuse & Neglect 26 (4): 317–332. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00311-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocozza, M., P. A. Gustafsson, and G. Sydsjö. 2010. “Child Protection in a Family-Service Organisation: What is the Outcome for Maltreated Children?” Children and Youth Services Review 32 (7): 922–928. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney, J., and T. Spratt. 2009. “Child Abuse as a Complex and Wicked Problem: Reflecting on Policy Developments in the United Kingdom in Working with Children and Families with Multiple Problems.” Children and Youth Services Review 31 (6): 635–641. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, K., R. Flynn, M. Hollingshead, and A. Fernandes. 2012. “Improving the Educational Achievement of Young People in Out-Of-Home Care.” Children and Youth Services Review 34 (6): 1081–1083. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2010. Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S., and M. Hardy. 2015. “Complex Issues, Complex Solutions: Applying Complexity Theory in Social Work Practice.” Nordic Social Work Research 5 (1): 98–114. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2015.1065902.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. 2007. “Uncertainty – The Defining Characteristic of Social Work?” In Social Work – A Companion to Learning, edited by M. Lymbery and K. Postle, 30–39. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freymond, N., and G. Cameron, eds. 2006. Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., ed. 1997. Combatting Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., N. Parton, and M. Skivenes. 2011. Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glad, J. 2006. “Co-Operation in a Child Welfare Case: A Comparative Cross-National Vignette Study: [Samarbete I Ett Socialt Barnavårdsärende: En Jämförande Tvärnationell Vinjettstudie].” European Journal of Social Work 9 (2): 223–240. doi:10.1080/13691450600723187.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., and B. Lundman. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness.” Nurse Education Today 24 (2): 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grell, P., N. Ahmadi, and B. Blom. 2016. “The Balancing Act: Clients with Complex Needs Describe Their Handling of Specialised Personal Social Services in Sweden.” British Journal of Social Work 47 (3): 611–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grint, K. 2008. “Wicked Problems and Clumsy Solutions: The Role of Leadership.” Clinical Leader 1 (2): 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., E. Namey, and K. Mckenna. 2017. “How Many Focus Groups are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes.” Field Methods 29 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüscü, A., L. Nygren, and E. Khoo. 2015. “Bringing the Family Back In: On Role Assignment and Clientification in the Swedish Social Services.” Social Sciences 4 (1): 117–133. doi:10.3390/socsci4010117.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–739. doi:10.1177/0095399713481601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K., T. Lundström, and M. Sallnäs. 2011. “A Comparison of Out-Of-Home Care for Children and Young People in Australia and Sweden: Worlds Apart?.” Australian Social Work 64 (4): 416–431. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2011.603092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggdalsvik, I., P. Rød, and K. Heggen. 2018. “Decision-Making in Child Welfare Services: Professional Discretion versus Standardized Templates.” Child & Family Social Work 23 (3): 522–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. 2014. “Complexity and Integrated Working in Children’s Services.” British Journal of Social Work 44 (1): 27–43. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križ, K., and M. Skivenes. 2013. “Systemic Differences in Views on Risk: A Comparative Case Vignette Study of Risk Assessment in England, Norway and the United States (California).” Children and Youth Services Review 35 (11): 1862–1870. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križ, K., and M. Skivenes. 2014. “Street-Level Policy Aims of Child Welfare Workers in England, Norway and the United States: An Exploratory Study.” Children and Youth Services Review 4 (1): 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• Liljegren, A., S. Höjer, and T. Forkby. 2014. “Laypersons, Professions, and Governance in the Welfare State: The Swedish Child Protection System.” Journal of Professions and Organization 1 (2): 161–175. doi:10.1093/jpo/jou005.
   Google Scholar
• Linhorst, D. 2002. “A Review of the Use and Potential of Focus Groups in Social Work Research.” Qualitative Social Work 1 (2): 208–228. doi:10.1177/1473325002001002620.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, M., B. Blom, S. Morén, and M. Perlinski. 2009. “Från Integrering till Specialisering: Om Organisering Av Socialtjänstens Individ- och Familjeomsorg 1988–2008. [From Integration to Specialization: On the Organization in Personal Social Services 1998-2008].” Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 2: 162–183.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M. J., C. L. Taylor, and M. O’Donnell. 2017. “Relationship between Out-Of-Home Care Placement History Characteristics and Educational Achievement: A Population Level Linked Data Study.” Child Abuse & Neglect 70: 146–159. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, K. 2012. “Thinking Family? the Complexities for Family Engagement in Care and Protection.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (5): 906–920. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2011. The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report-A Child-Centred Approach. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, L., and S. Oltedal. 2015. “Constructing a Vignette for Qualitative Comparative Family Research.” Journal of Comparative Social Work 10 (1): 1–14. doi:10.31265/jcsw.v10i1.123.
   Google Scholar
• Östberg, F. 2010. Bedömningar och beslut: Från anmälan till insats i den sociala barnavården. [Assessments and decisions: From notification to intervention in child welfare]. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Österberg, T., B. Gustafsson, and B. Vinnerljung. 2016. “Children in Out-Of-Home Care and Adult Labor-Market Attachment: A Swedish National Register Study.” Journal of Public Child Welfare 10 (4): 414–433. doi:10.1080/15548732.2016.1209148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. 2014. The Politics of Child Protection. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. W., and K. R. Bush. 2013. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, J. 2006. Prioriteringar och processer inom socialtjänsten: En undersökning i åtta kommuner. (1. uppl.) [Prioritisations and processes in social services: A study in eight municipalities]. Malmö: Bokbox.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmusson, B., U. Hyvönen, L. Nygren, and E. Khoo. 2010. “Child-Centered Social Work Practice. Three Unique Meanings in the Context of Looking after Children and the Assessment Framework in Australia, Canada and Sweden.” Children and Youth Services Review 32 (3): 452–459. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. J. 2008. “Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions.” Evaluation 14 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1177/1356389007084674.
   Google Scholar
• Skoog, V., E. Khoo, and L. Nygren. 2015. “Disconnection and Dislocation: Relationships and Belonging in Unstable Foster and Institutional Care.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (6): 1888–1904. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soydan, H. 1995. “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of How Social Workers in Sweden and England Assess A Migrant Family.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 4 (2): 85–93. doi:10.1111/ijsw.1995.4.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. 2009. “Identifying Families with Multiple Problems: Possible Responses from Child and Family Social Work to Current Policy Developments.” British Journal of Social Work 39 (3): 435–450. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, I., and P. Cox. 2008. “Complexity Theory: Developing New Understandings of Child Protection in Field Settings and in Residential Child Care.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (7): 1320–1336. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, I., and P. Hassett. 2007. “Applying Complexity Theory to Risk in Child Protection Practice.” Childhood 14 (1): 128–144. doi:10.1177/0907568207072535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnberg, A. 2017. “The Wicked Nature of Social Systems: A Complexity Approach to Sociology.” Dissertation, University of Gothenburg. Department of Sociology and Work Science, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., and M. Thompson. 2011. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, S. 2006. “Signs of child maltreatment. The Extent and Nature of Referrals to Swedish Child Welfare Agencies [Barnavårdsanmälningar i Sverige: Omfattning, källor och problembilder].” European Journal of Social Work 9 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1080/13691450500480615.
   Google Scholar
• Wörlén, M., and Å. Bergmark. 2012. “Priorities and Determinants of Priorities of Swedish Social Workers.” European Journal of Social Work 15 (5): 645–663. doi:10.1080/13691457.2011.577561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar