The legitimacy and implications of inspection in social services organisations in Sweden

References

• Bengtsson, M., and E. Ek. 2013. “Tillsyn.” [*Inspection**.] In Uppdrag offentlig granskning, edited by V. Johansson and L. Lindgren, 50–66. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å., and R. Minas. 2007. “Decentraliserad Välfärd Eller Medborgerliga Rättigheter? Om Omfördelning Av Makt Och Ansvar Mellan Stat Och Kommun.” [*Decentralised Welfare or Civli Rights? about the Redistribution of Power and Responsibility between Government and Municipalities**.] Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 2–3: 220–241. Accessed augusti 10 2016. http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/svt/article/view/15655/14138
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., T. Makkai, and V. Braithwaite. 2007. Regulating Aged Care: Ritualism and the New Pyramid. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, E. Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V., J. Braithwaite, D. Gibson, and T. Makkai. 1994. “Regulatory Styles, Motivational Postures and Nursing Home Compliance.” Law and Policy 16: 363–394. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1994.tb00130.x.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. A. 2003. “A New Approach to Tax Compliance.” In Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion, edited by V. A. Braithwaite, 1–14. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, T. 2014. “Den professionella logiken: hur vetenskap och praktik förenas i det moderna kunskapssamhället”. [The professional logic: how science and practice unites in modern society of knowledge]. (1. uppl.) Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Day, P., and R. Klein. 1987. Accountabilities: Five Public Services. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, S. M., and W. R. Scott. 1975. Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M., H. Alrichter, G. McNamara, and J. O’Hara. 2013. “Impact of School Inspections on Improvement of Schools—Describing Assumptions on Causal Mechanisms in Six European Countries.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25: 3–43. doi:10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14: 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness, S. 2009. “A Hindrance or A Help? the Contribution of Inspection to the Quality of Care in Homes for Older People.” British Journal of Social Work 39: 488–505. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 1999. “The Inequality of Performance Measurements.” Evaluation, no. 5: 160–172. doi:10.1177/13563899922208904.
   Google Scholar
• Hämberg, E. 2017. “Tillsyn i teori och praktik: om statlig styrning och kontroll av socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg”. [Inspection in theory and practice - governance and control of personal social services]. Diss. (sammanfattning). Örebro: Örebro universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 1983. Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hegtvedt, K. A., and C. Johnson. 2009. “Power and Justice: Toward an Understanding of Legitimacy.” American Behavioral Scientist 53: 376–399. doi:10.1177/0002764209338798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., O. James, and C. Scott. 2000. “Regulation of Government: Has It Increased, Is It Increasing, Should It Be Diminished?” Public Administration 78: 283–304. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15: 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IVO (Inspektionen för vård och omsorg). 2013. “Vad Har Vi Sett? Resultat Från Inspektioner 2010–2013 Av HVB För Barn Och Unga Och Bostäder Enligt 9 § 8 LSS.” [What Have We Observed? Results from 2010–2013 Inspections of Institutions for Children and Youths and Housing in Accordance with 9 § 8 LSS.] Accessed September 17 2016. https://www.ivo.se/globalassets/dokument/publicerat/rapporter/rapporter-2013/vad-har-vi-sett.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkman. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. 2009. “A Pluralist View of Generalization in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 32 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1080/17437270902759931.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. 2004. “Compliance Motivations: Affirmative and Negative Bases.” Law and Society Review 38: 41–68. doi:10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801002.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2004. “The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 34: 1075–1095. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., T. R. Tyler, and A. Curtis. 2009. “Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law?” Regulation and Governance 3: 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pålsson, D. 2016. “Adjusting to Standards: Reflections from ‘Auditees’ at Residential Homes for Children in Sweden.” Nordic Social Work Research 6 (3): 222–233. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2016.1192054.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• SKL (Sveriges kommuner och Landsting). 2012. “Uppdrag Och Samspel Mellan Politiker Och Tjänstemän.” [*Tasks and Interaction between Politicans and Civil Servants**.] Stockholm. Accessed October 25 2016. https://webbutik.skl.se/sv/artiklar/uppdrag-och-samspel-mellan-ledande-politiker-och-tjansteman.html
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, U. 2003. “Kommunalt självstyrelse.” [*Municipal autonomy**.] In Svensk författningspolitik, edited by I. Mattson and O. Petersson, 191–214. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. 2003. “Understanding Taxpayer Attitudes through an Understanding Taxpayer Identities.” In Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion, edited by V. A. Braithwaite. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, P. 2008. Arbetsvillkor I Den Sociala Barnavården: Förutsättningar För Ett Kvalificerat Arbete [*Working Conditions within Child Welfare Social Work – Requirements for Competent Work**]. Stockholm: Institutionen för socialt arbete - Socialhögskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Tillsynsutredningen. 2004. Tillsyn: Förslag Om En Tydligare Och Effektivare Offentlig Tillsyn: Slutbetänkande [*Inspection: Suggestions for a Clearer and More Effective Government Inspection: Final Report **]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 1997. “The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 1: 323–345. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2001. “A Psychological Perspective on the Legitimacy of Institutions and Authorities.” In The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, edited by J. T. Jost and B. Major, 416–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Utredningen om tillsynen inom socilatjänsten. 2007. Samordnad och tydlig tillsyn av socialtjänsten: Slutbetänkande [*Coordinated and clear social services inspection: Final report **]. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. A. 2004. “Beyond Power and Domination: Legitimacy and Formal Organisations.” In Legitimacy Processes in Organizations Research in the Sociology of Organizations. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 22), edited by C. Johnson, 239–271. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2007. Fallstudier: Design och genomförande. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M., and H. R. Walker. 2003. “The Legitimacy of Regimes.” In Power and Status. Advances in Group Processes, edited by S. R. Thye and J. Skvoretz, 217–249. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. J. 2001. “Theories of Legimitacy.” In The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relation, edited by J. T. Jost and B. Major, 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. J. 2004. “Institutional Effects on the Stability of Organisational Authorty.” In Legitimacy Processes in Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 22), edited by C. Johnson, 25–48. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI.
   Google Scholar