Preparing a dialogue conference together with persons with intellectual disabilities

References

• Bergold, J., and S. Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Qualitative Social Research 13 (1): Art. 30. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3334
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., and P. Frawley. 2010. “Reflections on Doing Inclusive Research in the ‘Making Life Good in the Community’ Study.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 35 (2): 53–61. doi:10.3109/13668251003716425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., P. Frawley, and P. Ramcharan. 2014. “Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27: 3–12. doi:10.1111/12083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, A. L. 2000. “Emergence of Participatory Methodology in Learning Difficulty Research: Understanding the Context.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 28 (1): 38–43. doi:10.1046/1468-3156.2000.00004.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, A. L., D. Goodley, and R. Lawthom. 2001. “Making Connections: The Relevance of the Social Model of Disability for People with Learning Disabilities.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29 (2): 45–50. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00084.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., A. Chak, F. Cornish, and A. Gillespie. 2013. “Dialogue: Bridging Personal, Community, and Social Transformation.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 53: 70–93. doi:10.1177/2F0022167812447298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., and R. Jewkes. 1995. “What Is Participatory Research?” Social Science and Medicine 4 (12): 1667–1676. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, A. J., and K. R. McVilly. 2004. “Ethics Guidelines for International, Multicenter Research Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 1 (2): 57–70. doi:10.1111/1741-1130.2004.04010.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaye, T. 2010. Teaching and Learning through Reflective Practice: A Practical Guide for Positive Actions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, T. 2004. “Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Research: Issues and Possibilities.” Health and Social Care in the Community 12 (4): 298–308. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjermestad, A., L. Luteberget, T. Midjo, and A. E. Witsø. 2017. “Everyday Life of Persons with Intellectual Disability Living in Residential Settings: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.” Disability & Society 32 (2): 213–232. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1284649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, G., and P. Ramcharan. 2009. “Valuing People and Research: Outcomes of the Learning Disability Research Initiative.” Tizard Learning Disability Review 14 (2): 25–34. doi:10.1108/13595474200900016.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., K. MacQueen, and E. Namey. 2011. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, B. 2001. “Theory and Practice: The Mediating Discourse.” In Handbook of Action Research – Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason, H. Bradbury, and U. K.17–26. London. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hauger, B., and A. Arntzen. 2003. “User Participation as Ideal and Opportunity.” [Brukermedvirkning Som Ideal Og Mulighet]. In Health Promoting Work in a Period of Change: From Monologue to Dialogue [Helsefremmende Arbeid I En Brytningstid: Fra Monolog Til Dialog], edited by H. A. Hauge and M. B. Mittelmark. 174–192. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, C., M. Nind, S. Parsons, A. Power, and A. Collins. 2015. “Building a Social Machine; Co-Designing a Time Bank for Inclusive Research.” Proceeding WebSci 15: Article No. 16. Oxford, UK. doi:10.1145/2786451.2786472.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., G. Minogue, and R. Hopklin. 2014. “Inclusive Research: Making a Difference to Policy and Legislation.” Journal of Applied Research on Intellectual Disabilities 27 (1): 76–84. doi:10.1111/12085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, D. L. 1989. Participant Observation. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 15. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kilanowski, J. 2012. “Making a Difference in a Migrant Summer School: Two Years of Data from Nutrition and Activity Interventions.” Journal of Pediatric Health Care 26 (5): e39. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2012.07.010.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2000. “The Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled People and Disability Research.” Disability and Society 15 (1): 25–47. doi:10.1080/09687590025757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, O. 2011. “Any Added Value? Co-Constructing Life Stories of and with People with Intellectual Disabilities.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 40: 213–221. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClimens, A. 2008. “This Is My Truth, Tell Me Yours: Exploring the Internal Tensions within Collaborative Learning Disability Research.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36 (4): 271–276. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00485.
   Google Scholar
• McClimens, A. 2010. “These Self-Evident Truths: Power and Control in Intellectual Disability Research.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 35 (2): 64–65. doi:10.3109/13668251003726861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., C. Keys, and D. Henry. 2008. “The Gatekeepers of Science: Attitudes toward the Research Participation of Adults with Intellectual Disability.” American Journal of Mental Retardation 113: 466–478. doi:10.1352/2008.113:0466-478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nind, M. 2011. “Participatory Data Analysis: A Step Too Far?” Qualitative Research 11 (4): 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M. 2014. What Is Inclusive Research? London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., and H. Vinha. 2014. “Practical Considerations in Doing Research Inclusively and Doing It Well. Lessons for Doing Research Inclusive.” Methodological Review paper. National Centre for Research method. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3187/1/Nind_practical_considerations_in_doing_research_inclusively.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2): 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Østby, M., M. Haugenes, G. Werner Fiskergaard, C. Høgstøyl, O. M. Oterhals, M. Sten, and A. E. Witsø. 2016. It’s the Way I like It! A Project about Self-Determination and Self-Assertion in People with Intellectual Disabilities. https://spiritdisabilityplatform.wordpress.com/launch-event/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. 2011. The Promise of Dialogue. The Dialogic Turn in the Production and Communication of Knowledge. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., and M. Kristiansen. 2012. “Characteristics and Challenges of Collaborative Research: Further Perspectives on Reflexive Strategies.” In Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. edited by L. Phillips. 257–282. Routledge Advances in Research Methods, Vol. 6. New York: Routledge. eBook.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., M. Kristiansen, M. Vehviläinen, and E. Gunnarsson. 2012. “Tackling the Tensions of Dialogue and Participation Reflexive Strategies for Collaborative Research.” In Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. edited by L. Phillips, 1–18. Routledge Advances in Research Methods, Vol. 6. New York: Routledge. eBook.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, L., N. Extremera, A. Durán, and M. Ortiz-Tallo. 2013. “Subjective Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Emotional Competence on Their Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 26 (2): 146–156. doi:10.1111/jar.12015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1962. Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (Phaenomenological). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Thagaard, T. 2013. Systematikk Og Innlevelse: En Innføring I Kvalitativ Metode. Systematics and Empathy: An Introduction to Qualitative Methods.]. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen, K., and I. Olstad. 2005. Life Stories, Life Cycle and Aging: Conversations with People with Developmental Disabilities [Livshistorier, Livsløp Og Aldring: Samtaler Med Mennesker Med Utviklingshemming]. Tønsberg: Aldring og Helse [Ageing and Health].
   Google Scholar
• Vinha, M. H. G. L. 2011. Learners’ Perspectives of Identity and Differences: A Narrative Study on Visual and Verbal Representations of Self and Other. PhD thesis. University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2001. “Normalisation, Emancipatory Research and Learning Disability.” Disability and Society 16 (2): 187–205. doi:10.1080/09687590120035807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2004. “Inclusive Learning Disability Research: The (Nondisabled) Researcher’s Role.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32 (2): 65–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00281.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J., and K. Johnson. 2003. Inclusive Research with People with Disabilities: Past, Present and Futures. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Witsø, A. E., and B. Hauger. 2018. “Everyday Life from the Perspective of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Living in a Norwegian Context.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. doi:10.1177/2F1744629518774174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woelders, S., T. Abma, T. Visser, and K. Schipper. 2015. “The Power of Difference in Inclusive Research.” Disability and Society 24: 1–15. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1031880.
   Google Scholar