ICT-mediated social work practice and innovation: professionals’ experiences in the Norwegian Labour And Welfare Administration

References

• Andreassen, T. A. 2018. “Measures of Accountability and Delegated Discretion in Activation Work: Lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service.” European Journal of Social Work 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423548.
   Google Scholar
• Antonio, E. M., M. J.-P. José, and M. S. Chaime. 2018. “e-Social Work in Practice: A Case Study.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 930–941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonio, L. P., P. G. Raquel, and A.-T. M. M. Victoria. 2018. “e-Social Work: Building a New Field of Specialization in Social Work?” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 804–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1399256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., J. Warburton, S. Hodgkin, and J. Pascal. 2014. “Reimagining the Relationship between Social Work and Information Communication Technology in the Network Society.” Australian Social Work 67 (4): 467–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.928336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfoed, E. M. 2019. “Digital Clients: An Example of People Production in Social Work.” Social Inclusion 7 (1): 196–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. E. 2017. “Social Work Practice and Technology: Ethical Issues and Policy Responses.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 35 (1): 8–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1277906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzin, S. C., and C. J. Coulton. 2017. “Harness Technology for Social Good.” In Grand Challenges for Social Work and Society, edited by R. Fong, E. J. Lubben, and R. P. Barth, 483–542. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., R. Roose, and J. Devlieghere. 2017. “Creating Transparency through Electronic Information Systems: Opportunities and Pitfalls.” The British Journal of Social Work 48 (3): 734–750. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., and G. Kirwan. 2019. “Relationship-based Social Work and Electronic Communication Technologies: Anticipation, Adaptation and Achievement.” Journal of Social Work Practice 33 (2): 217–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1604499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., and M. J. Holosko. 2016. “A Review of Information and Communication Technology Enhanced Social Work Interventions.” Research on Social Work Practice 26 (1): 88–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515578884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, J. W. 2009. “Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development.” Research on Social Work Practice 19 (5): 503–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingfelder, H. E., and D. S. Mandell. 2011. “Bridging the Research-to-practice Gap in Autism Intervention: An Application of Diffusion of Innovation Theory.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41 (5): 597–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1081-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, D. 2019. “Using Data to Improve Client Services.” In Digital Social Work: Tools for Practice with Individuals, Organizations, and Communities, edited by L. Goldkind, L. Wolf, and P. P. Freddolino. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, M. L. 2017. “Science, Innovation, and Social Work: Clash or Convergence?” Research on Social Work Practice 27 (2): 123–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516686198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2015. “Electronic Information Systems in Human Service Organisations: The What, Who, Why and How of Information.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (5): 1598–1613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2016. “Electronic Information Systems and Human Service Organizations: The Needs of Managers.” Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance 40 (1): 51–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1069232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkind, L., L. Wolf, and P. P. Freddolino. 2018. Digital Social Work: Tools for Practice with Individuals, Organizations, and Communities. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkind, L., L. Wolf, and J. Jones. 2016. “Late Adapters? How Social Workers Acquire Knowledge and Skills about Technology Tools.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 34 (4): 338–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2016.1250027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, and O. Kyriakidou. 2004. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations.” The Milbank Quarterly 82 (4): 581–629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, C. J. 2017. “Bridging Social Innovation and Social Work: Balancing Science, Values, and Speed.” Research on Social Work Practice 27 (2): 129–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516658353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. T., K. Lundberg, and L. J. Syltevik. 2018. “Digitalization, Street-level Bureaucracy and Welfare Users’ Experiences.” Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 67–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A., and I. Shaw. 2011. Social Work & ICT. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, H. K., and P. M. Roman. 2015. “Innovation Attributes and Adoption Decisions: Perspectives from Leaders of a National Sample of Addiction Treatment Organizations.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 49: 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagsten, J., and A. Andersson. 2018. “Use of Information Systems in Social Work – Challenges and an Agenda for Future Research.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 850–862. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavié, A. H., and A. I. L. Fernandez. 2018. “New Social Intervention Technologies as a Challenge in Social Work: IFSW Europe Perspective.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (6): 824–835. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariën, I., and J. A. Prodnik. 2014. “Digital Inclusion and User (Dis)empowerment: A Critical Perspective.” Info 16 (6): 35–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2014-0030.
   Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., S. Fantus, and L. B. McInroy. 2016. “Informal Use of Information and Communication Technology: Adjunct to Traditional Face-to-face Social Work Practice.” Clinic Social Work. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0576-3.
   Google Scholar
• Norway, S. 2018. ICT Usage in Households. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, T., U. Samuelsson, and D. Viscovi. 2019. “At Risk of Exclusion? Degrees of ICT Access and Literacy among Senior Citizens.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (1): 55–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øvrelid, B. 2018. “Profesjonsidentitetens vilkår [Professional Identity Conditions].” Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 21 (2): 103–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.18261/.2464-3076-2018-02-02.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, L., and I. Madoc-Jones. 2008. “Reclaiming Information and Communication Technologies for Empowering Social Work Practice.” Journal of Social Work 8 (2): 181–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307084739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. 2008. “Changes in the Form of Knowledge in Social Work: From the ‘Social’ to the ‘Informal’?” British Journal of Social Work 38: 253–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Røhnebæk, M. 2013. “Standardized Flexibility: The Choreography of ICT in Standardization of Service Work.” Culture Unbound 4 (4): 679–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124679.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2013. “The Reform of the Welfare Services in Norway: One Office – One Way of Thinking?” European Journal of Social Work 16 (5): 708–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.722982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2017. “‘How’ We Do Social Work, Not ‘What’ We Do.” Nordic Social Work Research 7 (2): 141–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2017.1284150.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, D., and P. M. Garrett. 2018. “Social Work ‘Logged On’: Contemporary Dilemmas in an Evolving ‘Techno-habitat’.” European Journal of Social Work 21 (1): 32–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1278520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Vol. 55. London: Transaction publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., and P. N. Shamdasani. 2014. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Vol. 20. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Traube, D. E., S. Begun, N. Okpych, and M. Choy-Brown. 2016. “Catalyzing Innovation in Social Work Practice.” Research on Social Work Practice 27 (2): 134–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516659140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., and S. T. Andersen. 2018. “User-driven Innovation and Technology-use in Public Health and Social Care: A Systematic Review of Existing Evidence.” Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 138–169.
   Google Scholar