Coping with tensions between standardization and individualization in social assistance

References

• Abercrombie, N., B. S. Turner, and S. Hill. 1994. Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and D. Kärreman. 2007. “Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1265–1281. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Astvik, W., and M. Melin. 2013. “Coping with the Imbalance between Job Demands and Resources: A Study of Different Coping Patterns and Implications for Health and Quality in Human Service Work.” Journal of Social Work 13 (4): 337–360. doi:10.1177/1468017311434682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astvik, W., M. Melin, and M. Allvin. 2014. “Survival Strategies in Social Work: A Study of How Coping Strategies Affect Service Quality, Professionalism and Employee Health.” Nordic Social Work Research 4 (1): 52–66. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2013.801879.
   Google Scholar
• Barfoed, E. M., and K. Jacobsson. 2012. “Moving from ‘Gut Feeling’ to ‘Pure Facts’: Launching the ASI Interview as Part of In-service Training for Social Workers.” Nordic Social Work Research 2 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2012.667245.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2013. Liquid Modernity. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, S., and S. C. Winter. 2017. “Street-level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth.” International Public Management Journal 20 (2): 316–353. doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1235641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, A., Å. Bergmark, and T. Lundström. 2011. Evidensbaserat socialt arbete: teori, kritik, praktik [Evidence-based Social Work: Theory, Critique, Practice]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2007. “Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 495–520. doi:10.1177/0010414005285755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. “From Street‐level to System‐level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology Is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E., and S. Jonsson. 2017. “Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling: Concept Evolution and Theoretical Challenges.” The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 2: 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., D. Wastell, S. White, C. Hall, S. Peckover, K. Thompson, … D. Davey. 2009. “Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-door of Local Authority Children’s Services.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (2): 352–370. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 1990. “Implementation as Policy Politics.” In Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box, edited by D. J. Palumbo and D. J. Calista, 107–118. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z., and G. Marston, Eds. 2013. Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organizations and Workfare Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buffat, A. 2015. “Street-level Bureaucracy and E-government.” Public Management Review 17 (1): 149–161. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, J., Declercq, A., & Hermans, K. (2016). “Street-Level Strategies of Child Welfare Social Workers in Flanders: The Use of Electronic Client Records in Practice.” British Journal of Social Work, 46 (5), 1249–1265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34 (6), 871–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2009. “New Professionalism and New Public Management: Changes, Continuities and Consequences.” Comparative Sociology 8 (2): 247–266. doi:10.1163/156913309X421655.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman, S., and R. Lazarus. 1980. “An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-Aged Community Sample.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 21 (3): 219–239. doi:10.2307/2136617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslund, A., Pello-Esso, W., Ulmestig, R., Vikman U., Waernbaum, I., Westerberg, A. and Zetterqvist, J. 2019. Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik. Vad och för vem? [Municipal labour market policy. What and for whom?] Ifau-rapport 2019:5. Uppsala: IFAU
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., and C. Humphreys. 2010. “Child Protection Practitioners and Decision-making Tools: Observations and Reflections from the Front Line.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (8): 2598–2616. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., P. Harnett, K. Healy, D. Lynch, and M. Tower. 2017. “Decision Making in Child and Family Welfare: The Role of Tools and Practice Frameworks.” Children Australia 42 (1): 49–56. doi:10.1017/cha.2016.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth Andersson, S., & Denvall, V. (2017). Data Recording in Performance Management: Trouble With the Logics. American Journal of Evaluation, 38 (2), 190–204. doi:10.1177/1098214016681510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 1983. Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015). “Decision-making tools and their influence on caseworkers' room for discretion.” The British Journal of Social Work, 45 (2), 600–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., and M. Hill. 2015. Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H. 2001. “I det sociala medborgarskapets skugga: Rätten till socialbidrag under 1980- och 1990-talen [In the shadow of social citizenship: The right to social assistance during the 1980s and 1990s].” Diss., Lund Univ., Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, K. 2015. “Law Enforcement and Policy Alienation: Coping by Labour Inspectors and Federal Police Officers.” In Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy, edited by P. Hupe and M. Hill (pp. 99–114). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson, T. 2015. “Barnrättsperspektivet I LVU-sammanhang [Children’s Rights Perspective in Special Provision for Care of Young People Act].” In Barns och ungas rätt vid tvångsvård: förslag till ny LVU (SOU 2015:71) (pp. 1149–1178). Stockholm: Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. 2004. “The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (8): 1075–1095. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K. 2020. Framing Standardization: Implementing a Quality Management System in Relation to Social Work Professionalism in the Social Services, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 44 (3): 229–243. DOI:10.1080/23303131.2020.1734132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K., Ulmestig, R., & Denvall, V. (2016). Initial bedömning: Implementeringen av ett standardiserat bedömningsinstrument för försörjningsstöd i Stockholm stad [Initial assessment: the implementation of a standardized assessment tool for social assistance i Stockholm city]. Växjö: Linnéuniversitetet
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., H. Davies, and J. Hughes. 2019. “Assessing and Labelling Evidence.” In What Works Now? Evidence-informed Policy and Practice, edited by A. Boaz, H. T. O. Davies, A. Fraser, and S. Nutley, 225–249. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panican, A., and Ulmestig, R. 2016. Social rights in the shadow of poor relief–social assistance in the universal Swedish welfare state. Citizenship Studies, 20 (3–4), 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponnert, L., and K. Svensson. 2016. “Standardisation—the End of Professional Discretion?” European Journal of Social Work 19 (3–4): 586–599. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1074551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D. 2017. “How Governance Conditions Affect the Individualization of Active Labour Market Services: An Exploratory Vignette Study.” Public Administration 95 (2): 468–481. doi:10.1111/padm.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 1994. Vad Bör Staten Göra? Om Välfärdsstatens Moraliska Och Politiska Logik [What Should the State Do? on the Welfare State’s Moral and Political Logic]. Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Rutz, S., D. Mathew, P. Robben, and A. de Bont. 2017. “Enhancing Responsiveness and Consistency: Comparing the Collective Use of Discretion and Discretionary Room at Inspectorates in England and the Netherlands.” Regulation & Governance 11 (1): 81–94. doi:10.1111/rego.12101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: WW Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., Agevall Gross, L., Kjellgren, C., & Denvall, V. (2019). The pursuit of standardization in domestic violence social work: A multiple case study of how the idea of using risk assessment tools is manifested and processed in the Swedish social services. Qualitative Social Work, 18 (3), 458–474. doi:10.1177/1473325017739461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., and L. Oscarsson. 2020. “Applying Standardisation Tools in Social Work Practice from the Perspectives of Social Workers, Managers, and Politicians: A Swedish Case Study.” European Journal of Social Work 23 (2): 265–276. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1540409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., Ed. 2004. New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, K. H. 2008. “Activation Policy in Action: A Street-Level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State.” Doctoral thesis, Acta Wexionensia, 1404–4307; 165.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and S. Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but Not A Standard World: Toward A Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L. G., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R. (2007). På gränsen till fattigvård: En studie om arbetsmarknadspolitik och socialbidrag [On the verge of poor relief: A study on labor market policy and social assistance](Doctoral dissertation, Lund University)
   Google Scholar