Structuration processes of client-oriented and system-oriented social work practice: the view point of client documentation

References

• Archer, M. 1996. “Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction.” Sociology 30 (4): 679–699.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, S. R. 2006. “Making Time for Change: On Temporal Conceptualizations within (Critical Realist) Approaches to the Relationship between Structure and Agency.” Sociology 40 (1): 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., and S. Croft. 2004. “Service Users and Practitioners Reunited: The Key Component for Social Work Reform.” British Journal of Social Work 34 (1): 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., S. Croft, and L. Adshead. 2007. “We Don’t See Her as A Social Worker: A Service User Case Study of the Importance of the Social Worker’s Relationship and Humanity.” British Journal of Social Work 38 (7): 1388–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2008. Social Research Methods. Third ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 2009. “Introduction: Case-based Methods: Why We Need Them; What They Are; How to Do Them.” In The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods, edited by D. Byrne and C. C. Ragin, 1–13. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and C. C. Ragin, ed. 2009. The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, B., B. Galaway, and B. R. Cournoyer. 2005. Social Work Processes. Belmont: Books/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, S., E. Fitzpatrick, D. McAuliffe, S. McKain, C. Martin, and A. Tonge. 2007. “Raising the Titanic: Rescuing Social Work Documentation from the Sea of Ethical Risk.” Australian Social Work 60 (2): 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, A. 2010. “History of Research on Process Relevant to Clinical Social Work.” Clinical Social Work Journal 39 (1): 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebsen, F. 2018. “Editorial. Decision-making in Social Work.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish advisory board on research integrity. 2012. Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Finland. Helsinki: Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., and B. Pease. 1999. “Emancipatory Social Work for a Postmodern Age.” In Transforming Social Work Practice. Postmodern Critical Perspectives, edited by B. Pease and J. Fook, 224–229. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. 2013. Social Work Practice. A Critical Thinker´s Guide. Third ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, P., B. Blom, and N. Ahmadi. 2019. “Conditions for Helping Relations in Specialized Personal Services: A Client Perspective on the Influence of Organizational Structures.” Nordic Social Work Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1596148
   Google Scholar
• Günther, K. 2012. “”Kirjatut Ammatilliset Kehykset. Mielenterveyskuntoutus Asiakassuunnitelmien Kuvaamana.” [Professional Frames in Documents. Mental Health Rehabilitation as Described in Client Plans].” Janus 20 (1): 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, K. 2015. Asiakasdokumentaatio Arviointina Mielenterveystyön Arjessa. Tutkimus Ammatillisesta Kirjaamisesta. [Client Documentation as Assessment in the Everyday Practices of Mental Health Social Work: A Study on Professional Reporting]. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperiensis 1602. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, K., S. Raitakari, and K. Juhila. 2015. “From Plan Meetings to Care Plans: Genre Chains and the Intertextual Relations of Text and Talk.” Discourse & Communication 9 (1): 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T. 2004. Alaikäisyys Ja Rikollisuuden Muuttuvat Tulkinnat Suomalaisessa Lainsäätämiskäytännössä [The Status of Minors and Chancing Interpretations of Crime in Finnish Legislation]. Helsinki: Finnish Youth Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T., and P.-L. Rauhala. 2019. Towards Glocal Social Work in the Era of Compressed Modernity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, K. 2006. “Social Work, New Public Management and the Language of ‘Service User’.” British Journal of Social Work 36 (1): 139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heini, A., L. Hokkanen, K. Kontu, K. Kunttu, N. Lindroos, and H. Ronimus. 2019. Delaktighet Och Samarbete I Det Sociala Arbetet För Personer Med Funktionsnedsättning—klienternas Uppleverser. [Participation in Social Work with Disabled People Is Collaboration—client Experiences]. Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopiston yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja B. Tutkimusraportteja ja selvityksiä 69.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (2010). The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. British Journal of Sociology 61 (1), 253–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kivistö, M. 2014. Kolme ja yksi kuvaa osallisuuteen. Vaikeavammaisten ihmisten osallisuus toimintana, kokemuksena ja kielenkäyttönä [Three and one images on inclusion. Inclusion of persons with severe disabilities as action, experience and language-use]. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 283. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kivistö, M., and S. Hautala 2020. Dokumentoitu asiakaslähtöisyys? Vammaissosiaalityön prosessit asiakasdokumenttien kuvaamana [Documented client orientation? Processes of social work involving persons with disabilities described through client documents]. Janus 28 (3), 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Laisi, N., T. Lappalainen, and M. Vauramo. 2016. Selvitys Vammaispalveluiden Sosiaalialan Ammattilaisten Näkemyksistä [Views of Social Welfare Professionals in Disability Services]. Helsinki: Invalidiliitto ry & Talentia ry.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, M., and A. Niskala. 2016. “Sosiaalityön Suhde Asiakkuuteen. [The Relationship of Social Work to Clientship].” In Asiakkaat Toimijoina Sosiaalityössä, edited by M. Laitinen and A. Niskala, 9–16. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Mackrill, T., F. Ebsen, H. B. Antczak, and I. L. Svendsen. 2018. “Care Planning Using SMART Criteria in Statutory Youth Social Work in Denmark: Reflections, Challenges and Solutions.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Martinell Barfoed, E. 2018. “From Stories to Standardised Interaction: Changing Conversation Formats in Social Work.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. 2006. Challenging Social Work. The Institutional Context of Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Närhi, K., and T. Kokkonen. 2014. “Transformations of Participation Politics and Social Citizenship in Finnish Welfare Governance.” In Participation, Marginalization, and Welfare Services: Concepts, Politics and Practices across European Countries, edited by A.-L. Matthies and L. Uggerhøj, 95–112. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., B. Sapey, and P. Thomas. 2012. Social Work with Disabled People. Fourth ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ornellas, A., G. Spolander, L. K. Engelbrecht, A. Sigora, I. Pervova, M.-A. Martinez-Roman, A. K. Law, P. K. Shjahan, and M. Das Dores Guerreiro. 2019. “Mapping Social Work across 10 Countries: Structure, Intervention, Identity and Challenges.” International Social Work 62 (4): 1183–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. 2009. “Understanding Social Work Process.” In Social Work. Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, edited by R. Adams, L. Dominelli, and M. Payne, 159–174. Third ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. [1922] 1939. What Is Social Case Work? Philadelphia: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rötsä, M., H. Berglind, M. Huovila, K. Hyppönen, T. Peksiev, and J. Mykkänen. 2016. Implementation Project on National Information System Services and Standardised Documentation in Social Welfare Service. Project Plan 2016–2020. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).
   Google Scholar
• Savaya, R. 2010. “Enhancing Student Awareness of the Importance of Full and Accurate Documentation in Social Work Practice.” Social Work Education 29 (6): 660–669.
   Google Scholar
• Skillmark, M., and V. Denvall. 2018. “The Standardizers: Social Workers’ Role When Implementing Assessment Tools in Swedish Social Services.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (1): 88–99.
   Google Scholar
• Slasberg, C., and P. Beresford. 2017. “The Need to Bring an End to the Era of Eligibility Policies for a Person-centered, Financially Sustainable Future.” Disability & Society 32 (8): 1263–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler-Brooks, J. 2009. “Structuration Theory and Critical Consciousness: Potential Applications for Social Work Practice.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 1 (34): 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Xun, K. 2019. “The Landing Is Too Hard: How Social Workers Perceive Institutional Support for Case Management in Services for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Hong Kong.” International Social Work 62 (6): 1548–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yliruka, L., and S. Karvinen-Niinikoski. 2013. “How Can We Enhance Productivity in Social Work? Dynamically Reflective Structures, Dialogic Leadership and the Development of Transformative Expertise.” Journal of Social Work Practice 27 (2): 191–206. Anonymised references: Author 1 A-B; Author 1 & Author 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar