1,583
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

When the organization is a problem: an empirical study of social work with substance use problems in more or less NPM-influenced Swedish municipalities

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersson, L., and B. Johnson. 2020. “Patient Choice as A Means of Empowerment in Opioid Substitution Treatment: A Case from Sweden.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 27 (2): 105–117. doi:10.1080/09687637.2019.1591342.
  • Babor, T. F., K. Stenius, and A. Romelsjö. 2008. “Alcohol and Drug Treatment Systems in Public Health Perspective: Mediators and Moderators of Population Effects.” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 17 (SUPPL. 1): S50–S59. doi:10.1002/mpr.249.
  • Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bjerge, B., and T. Bjerregaard. 2017. “The Twilight Zone: Paradoxes of Practicing Reform.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 6 (2): 100–115. doi:10.1108/JOE-02-2017-0006.
  • Commons, M., T. G. McGuire, and M. H. Riordan. 1997. “Performance Contracting for Substance Abuse Treatment.” Health Services Research 32 (5): 631–650.
  • Dellgran, P. 2016. “Socionomer Som Profession.” In Socialt Arbete: En Grundbok, 3rd ed., edited by A. Meeuwisse, H. Swärd, S. Sunesson, and M. Knutagård, 251–270. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Eriksson, T., and A.-C. Janlöv. 2020. “Is Measuring Results in Social Services Possible? The Lived Experiences of Professionals in Key Positions.” Nordic Social Work Research 1–12. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2020.1750466.
  • Hanssen, J. K., G. S. Hutchinson, R. Lyngstad, and J. T. Sandvin. 2015. “What Happens to the Social in Social Work?” Nordic Social Work Research 5 (sup1): 115–126. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2015.1060895.
  • Hjärpe, T. 2017. “Measuring Social Work. Quantity as Quality in the Social Services.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 119 (1): 23–46.
  • Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
  • International federation of social workers. 2014. Global Definition of Social Work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
  • Klenk, T., and R. Reiter. 2019. “Post-New Public Management: Reform Ideas and Their Application in the Field of Social Services.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 85 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1177/0020852318810883.
  • Lauri, M. 2016. Narratives of Governing: Rationalization, Responsibility and Resistance in Social Work. Umeå universitet, Department of Political Science. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:923799
  • Lundström, T., and S. Sunesson. 2016. “Socialt arbete utförs i organisationer.” In Socialt arbete: En grundbok, 3rd ed., edited by A. Meeuwisse, H. Swärd, S. Sunesson, and M. Knutagård, 300–312. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Maynard, A., A. Street, and R. Hunter. 2011. “Using ‘Payment by Results’ to Fund the Treatment of Dependent Drug users—Proceed with Care!” Addiction 106 (10): 1725–1729. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03503.x.
  • Nesvåg, S., and T. Lie. 2010. “The Norwegian Substance Treatment Reform: Between New Public Management and Conditions for Good Practice.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 27 (6): 655–666. doi:10.1177/145507251002700610.
  • Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2017. “The Shirking Bureaucrat: A Theory in Search of Evidence?” Policy and Politics 45 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1332/030557317X14845830916703.
  • Pollitt, C., S. van Thiel, and V. Homburg, eds. 2007. New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Reiter, R., and T. Klenk. 2019. “The Manifold Meanings of ‘Post-new Public Management’–a Systematic Literature Review.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 85 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1177/0020852318759736.
  • Spolander, G., L. Engelbrecht, and A. Pullen Sansfaçon. 2016. “Social Work and Macro-economic Neoliberalism: Beyond the Social Justice Rhetoric.” European Journal of Social Work 19 (5): 634–649. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1066761.
  • Storbjörk, J. 2020. “How Substance Use Treatment Professionals Manage Organisational Tensions: A Web Survey and an Interview Study.” SUCHT 66 (2): 93–103. doi:10.1024/0939-5911/a000647.
  • Storbjörk, J., E. Antonsson, and K. Stenius. 2019. “The Swedish Addiction Treatment System: Government, Steering and Organisation.” Technical report. Stockholm University, Department of Public Health Sciences. doi:10.17045/sthlmuni.9906542.v1
  • Storbjörk, J., and E. Samuelsson. 2018. “Brukarinflytande på vårdmarknaden – en paradox i missbruks- och beroendevården?” In Socialtjänstmarknaden – om marknadsorientering och konkurrensutsättning av individ- och familjeomsorgen, edited by M. Sallnäs and S. Wiklund, 85–115. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Storbjörk, J., and K. Stenius. 2019a. “The New Privatized Market – A Question of Ideology or Pragmatism within the Swedish Addiction Treatment System?” Social Policy & Administration 53 (5): 776–792. doi:10.1111/spol.12414.
  • Storbjörk, J., and K. Stenius. 2019b. “Why Research Should Pay Attention to Effects of Marketization of Addiction Treatment Systems.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement, no. s18: 31–39. doi:10.15288/jsads.2019.s18.31.
  • Tham, P. 2018. “A Professional Role in Transition: Swedish Child Welfare Social Workers’ Descriptions of Their Work in 2003 and 2014.” British Journal of Social Work 48 (2): 449–467. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx016.
  • Wällstedt, N., and R. Almqvist. 2015. “From ‘Either Or’to ‘Both And’: Organisational Management in the Aftermath of NPM.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 19 (2): 7–25.