The meaning of biology in the foster family narratives of young adults

References

• Blaikie, N. 2007. Approaches to Social Inquiry. Cambridge, England: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. 2012. A Sociology of Family Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. 2011. “Sharing Surnames: Children, Family and Kinship.” Sociology 45 (4): 554–569. doi:10.1177/0038038511406600.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., and M. Strathern. 2000. “Including Our Own.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, edited by J. Carsten, 149–166. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, S. B. 2018. “Det Biologiske Prinsippet [The Biological Principle.” In Barnevernets begreper - i bevegelse, T. A. Ask and S. B. Eide, edited by. 45–62. The concepts of child welfare in motion. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Follevåg, G. 2002. Adoptert identitet. Adopted identity. Oslo: Spartacus.
   Google Scholar
• Follevåg, G. (2006). Biologosentrisme. [Biologosentrism]. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S., and A. Crowley. 2013. “Looked‐after Children and Their Birth Families: Using Sociology to Explore Changing Relationships, Hidden Histories and Nomadic Childhoods.” Child & Family Social Work 18 (1): 57–66. doi:10.1111/cfs.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtan, A. 2002. Barndom i fosterhjem i egen slekt [Childhood in foster care with relatives]. (Doctoral dissertation). Norway: University of Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Holtan, A. 2008. “Family Types and Social Integration in Kinship Foster Care.” Children and Youth Services Review 30 (9): 1022–1036. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtan, A., B. H. Handegård, R. Thørnblad, and S. A. Vis. 2013. “Placement Disruption in Long-Term Kinship and Nonkinship Foster Care.” Children and Youth Services Review 35 (7): 1087–1094. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2001. “‘En Vanlig Familie’: Utenlandsadopsjon I Norge, Et Stadig Voksende Fenomen [‘A Normal Family’: Transnational Adoption in Norway, a Growing Phenomenon].” In Blod–tykkere enn vann? Betydninger av slektskap i Norge, edited by S. Howell and M. Melhuus, 73-98. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2003. “Kinning: The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (3): 465–484. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2007a. “Imagined Kin, Place and Community: Some Paradoxes in the Transnational Movement of Children in Adoption.” In Holding Worlds Together: Ethnographies of Knowing and Belonging, edited by M. E. Lien and M. Melhuus, 17–36. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2019. “The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship (Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology), edited by S. Bamford, 658-674. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L., R. Simpson, and R. Lewis. 2011. Researching Families and Relationships: Reflections on Process. London, UK: Palgrave macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A.-M. 2011. “Kinship, Affinity and Connectedness: Exploring the Role of Genealogy in Personal Lives.” Sociology 45 (3): 379–395. doi:10.1177/0038038511399622.
   Google Scholar
• Leira, A. (1993). “Familly Sociology - Developing the Field. Introduction”. In A. Leira (Ed.), Familly Sociology - Developing the Field. Conference Proceedings (pp. 9–15). Oslo, Norway: [ Report 93:5]. Institute for social research.
   Google Scholar
• Likestillings- Og Inkluderingsdepartementet, B. (2003). Forskrift Om Fosterhjem [Norwegian Ministry of Children and Family Affairs. Regulations on foster care].12.18 Nr. 1659.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2008. “Tangible Affinities and the Real Life Fascination of Kinship.” Sociology 42 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1177/0038038507084824.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. R., R. Edwards, and V. Gillies. 2003. Making Families: Moral Tales of Parenting and step-parenting. York, UK: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge, England: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2011. “Framing Relationships and Families.” In Researching Families and Relationships, edited by L. Jamieson, R. Simpson, and R. Lewis, 19–30. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2019. “Family Practices in Time and Space.” Gender, Place & Culture 27 (5): 733–743. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1541870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. 2010. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Family Resemblances in Lesbian Donor Conception.” Sociology 44 (6): 1128–1144. doi:10.1177/0038038510381616.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. 2017. “Genetic Thinking and Everyday Living: On Family Practices and Family Imaginaries.” The Sociological Review 65 (4): 865–881. doi:10.1177/0038026117711645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. 1980. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Original work published in 1968. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. B., and C. Smart. 1999. “The ‘New’practices and Politics of Family Life.” In The New Family?, edited by E. B. Silva and C. Smart, 1–12. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M. 2011. “Norway: Toward a child-centric Perspective.” In Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations, edited by N. Gilbert, N. Parton, and M. Skivenes, 154–182. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skoglund, J. 2018. Upbringing by Relatives: Incorporating New Understandings and Perspectives into the Study of Kinship Foster Care. Tromso: Universitetet i Tromsø - Norges arktiske universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Skoglund, J., A. Holtan, and R. Thørnblad. 2018. “The Meaning and Making of Childhoods in Kinship care–young Adults’ Narratives.” Nordic Social Work Research 8 (3): 222–234. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2017.1422139.
   Google Scholar
• Skoglund, J., R. Thørnblad, and A. Holtan. 2018. “Children’s Relationships with Birth Parents in Childhood and Adulthood: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study of Kinship Care.” Qualitative Social Work 18 (6): 944–964. doi:10.1177/1473325018784646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C. 2007. Personal Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, E. G., and G.-A. Baugerud. 2018. Samvær etter omsorgsovertakelse. En barnefaglig og juridisk utredning. OsloMet Rapport 2018 nr 10. Oslo: OsloMet.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., and S. Timmermans. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thørnblad, R. 2011. Slektsfosterhjem - offentlig tiltak i private hjem. Tromso: Doktoravhandling, Universitetet i Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Thørnblad, R., and A. Holtan. 2011. “Oppvekst i slektsfosterhjem: Unge voksne fosterbarns familieforståelser.” Tidsskrift for undomsforskning 11 (1): 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Unicef. (2010). “Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children”. New York: United Nations. Available from: https://www.unicef
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Winokur, M., A. Holtan, and K. E. Batchelder. 2014. “Kinship Care for the Safety, Permanency, and well-being of Children Removed from the Home for Maltreatment.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014 (1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wissö, T., H. Johansson, and I. Höjer. 2019. “What Is a Family? Constructions of Family and Parenting after a Custody Transfer from Birth Parents to Foster Parents.” Child & Family Social Work 24 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1111/cfs.12475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar