Providing support for family carers: social workers describing their professional role

References

• Alftberg, Å. 2020. “Anhörigkonsulenters uppdrag och arbete. Rapport från en forskningscirkel om stöd till anhöriga och kunskapsbehov. [Family care advisors’ assignment and work. Report from a research circle about support for family carers and knowledge needs.] Hälsa och samhälles skriftserie.” In FoU-Rapport, 4. Vol. 2020. Malmö: Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Alftberg, Å. 2021. “Tidigare sa vi: Vad behöver ni hjälp med? Nu är det mer: Hur mår ni?” Anhörigkonsulenters upplevelser av stöd till anhöriga under covid-19-pandemin. [“Previously we said: What kind of help do you need? Now it is more like: How are you feeling?” Family care advisors’ experiences of support to family carers during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 28 (4): 439–453.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, F. 2007. Att Utmana Erfarenheter. Kunskapsutveckling I En forskningscirkel. [To Challenge experiences. Knowledge Development in a Research Circle.]. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. 1979. “The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 16 (3): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. 2012. Qualitative Research Skills for Social Work: Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., and J. C. Tronto. 1990. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Care.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by E. K. Abel and M. K. Nelson, 35–62. Albany, N.Y., USA: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrish, K. 2008. “Caring for the Carers: The Characteristics of District Nursing Support for Family Carers.” Primary Health Care Research & Development 9 (1): 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423607000515.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W., and A. Brown. 2009. Working with Qualitative Data. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R., R. Gegory, and R. Mason. 2006. “Professional Distance and Social Work: Stretching the Elastic?” Australian Social Work 59 (4): 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070600986010.
   Google Scholar
• Guberman, N., J.-P. Lavoie, J. Pepin, S. Lauzon, and M.-E. Montejo. 2006. “Formal Service Practitioners’ Views of Family Caregivers’ Responsibilities and Difficulties.” Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 25 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2006.0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2000. The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heite, C. 2012. “Setting and Crossing Boundaries: Professionalization of Social Work and Social Work Professionalism.” Social Work & Society 10 (2): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jegermalm, M. 2003. “Direct and Indirect Support for Carers Patterns of Support for Informal Caregivers to Elderly People in Sweden.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 38 (4): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v38n04_07.
   Google Scholar
• Jegermalm, M., and G. Sundström. 2015. “Stereotypes About Caregiving and Lessons from the Swedish Panorama of Care.” European Journal of Social Work 18 (2): 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.892476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2000. “Categorization: Identity, Social Process and Epistemology.” Current Sociology 48 (3): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392100048003003.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, L., H. Long, and M. G. Parker. 2011. “Informal Caregiving for Elders in Sweden: An Analysis of Current Policy Developments.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy 23 (4): 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2011.605630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, L., G. Sundström, and L. B. Hassing. 2003. “State Provision Down, Offspring’s Up: The Reverse Substitution of Old-Age Care in Sweden.” Ageing & Society 23 (3): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X02001071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koprowska, J. 2020. Communication and Interpersonal Skills in Social Work. London: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kreitzer, L., S. E. Brintnell, and W. Austin. 2020. “Institutional Barriers to Healthy Workplace Environments: From the Voices of Social Workers Experiencing Compassion Fatigue.” The British Journal of Social Work 50 (7): 1942–1960. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinonen, A. 2011. “Informal Family Carers and Lack of Personal Time: Descriptions of Being Outside the Sphere of Formal Help.” Nordic Social Work Research 1 (2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2011.601142.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliehorn, S., J. Isaksson, and P. Salander. 2021. “Two Sides of the Same Coin – Oncology Social workers’ Experiences of Their Working Life and Its Pros and Cons.” Nordic Social Work Research 13 (2): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1958907.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. 2006. “A Caring Profession? The Ethics of Care and Social Work with Older People.” British Journal of Social Work 36 (7): 1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., S. Iliffe, and A. Eden. 2003. “Testing Twigg and Atkin’s Typology of Caring: A Study of Primary Care professionals’ Perceptions of Dementia Care Using a Modified Focus Group Method.” Health and Social Care in the Community 11 (6): 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00453.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2019. Basic and Advanced Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071814307.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberg, L. 2016. “Service User Involvement in Swedish Mental Health and Social Care: An Analysis of Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions in a Collaboration Context.” European Journal of Social Work 19 (5): 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1081586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare 2012. Anhöriga Som Ger Omsorg Till närstående. Fördjupad Studie Av Omfattning Och Konsekvenser. [Next of Kins Who Provide Care to Relatives. In-Depth Study of Scope and consequences.] www.socialstyrelsen.se/.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare 2014. Stöd till personer som vårdar och stödjer närstående. Slutrapport 2014. [Support for people who care for and support relatives. Final report 2014.] www.socialstyrelsen.se//.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare 2016. Stöd till anhöriga. Vägledning till kommunerna för tillämpning av 5 kap. 10 § socialtjänstlagen. [Support for family carers. Guidance to the municipalities for the application of Chapter 5 Section 10 of the Social Services Act.] www.socialstyrelsen.se.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, E., and A. Olaison. 2023. ““I See What You Mean”—A Case Study of the Interactional Foundation of Building a Working Alliance in Care Decisions Involving an Older Couple Living with Cognitive Decline.” Healthcare 11 (15): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, A. G., C. Downing, A. Temane, and M. Hastings-Tolsma. 2017. “Compassion fatigue in nurses: A metasynthesis.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 26 (23–24): 23-24, 4364–4378. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olin, E., and A. Dunér. 2016. “A Matter of Love and Labour? Parents Working as Personal Assistants for Their Adult Disabled Children.” Nordic Social Work Research 6 (1): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2015.1099116.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. 2007. “Dual Relationships: Personal and Professional Boundaries in Rural Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 37 (8): 1405–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, E. C. 2014. “Using Friendship to Build Professional Family Work Relationships Where Child Neglect is an Issue: Workers Perceptions.” Australian Social Work 67 (3): 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2013.815240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaert, D., S. Nachtergaele, N. De Stercke, H. Gobeyn, and R. Roose. 2022. “Social Work as a Human Rights Profession: An Action Framework.” The British Journal of Social Work 52 (2): 928–945. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2011. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SFCCC (The Swedish Family Care Competence Center; in Swedish Nationellt kompetenscentrum anhöriga, Nka) 2021. Snabba fakta om Sveriges 1,3 miljoner anhöriga. [Quick facts about Sweden’s 1.3 million family carers.] Web folder Accessed January 4, 2022: https://www.anhoriga.se/Global/St%c3%b6d%20och%20kunskap/Fakta%20om%20anh%c3%b6riga/Dokument/Snabba_fakta_folder_Nka_140623_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shanley, C. 2008. “Supporting Family Carers Through Telephone-Mediated Group Programs: Opportunities for Gerontological Social Workers.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work 51 (3–4): 3-4, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634370802039460.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, M., A. Ståhl, and U. Melin Emilsson. 2015. “How the Care Managers Handle the Process When Older People Consider Relocation to a Residential Home.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (8): 2423–2440. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., P. N. Shamdasani, and D. W. Rook. 2007. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, K. 2005. “Rhythm and Rationality in the Relationship Between Social Worker, Client and Researcher.” In Evidence Based Practice? Challenges in Substance Abuse Treatment (NAD-Publikation 47) , edited by M. U. Pedersen, V. Segraeus, and M. Hellman, 57–70. Helsinki: NAD.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J. 2018. A Hybrid Approach to Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research: Using a Practical Example. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M. 2005. Äldreomsorgsforskning I Norden. En kunskapsöversikt. [Research on Care for Older People in the Nordic Countries: State of the art.] TemaNord 508. Copenhagen: Nordisk ministerråd.
   Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M., and G. Meagher. 2018. “Nordic Eldercare – Weak Universalism Becoming Weaker?” Journal of European Social Policy 28 (3): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717735062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takter, M. 2017. Vem Är den Enskilde I Ett Gemensamt Hem? En Studie Av Hur Biståndshandläggare Förhåller Sig Till Anhörigas Möjligheter Till Frivillighet, Autonomi Och Personlig integritet. [Who is the Individual in a Shared Home? A Study of How Care Managers Relate to Next of kins’ Opportunities for Voluntariness, Autonomy and Personal integrity.]. Malmö: Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Takter, M. 2020. Anhörigperspektiv – En Möjlighet Till Utveckling? Nationell Kartläggning Av Kommunernas Stöd Till Anhöriga 2019. [Family carers’ Perspective - an Opportunity for Development? National Survey of the municipalities’ Support for Family Carers in 2019.]. Varberg: Anhörigas Riksförbund.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1999. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, J., and K. Atkin. 1994. Carers Perceived. Policy and Practice in Informal Care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmanen, P., and M. Szebehely. 2015. “From the State to the Family or to the Market? Consequences of Reduced Residential Eldercare in Sweden.” International Journal of Social Welfare 24 (1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallroth, V. 2016. Men Do Care! A Gender-Aware and Masculinity-Informed Contribution to Caregiving Scholarship. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Winqvist, M. 2014. Anhörigkonsulentens Arbete Och Yrkesroll – Resultat Från En enkätundersökning. [The Family Care Advisor’s Work and Professional Role – Results from a survey.] Nka Rapport 2014:1. Kalmar: Nationellt kompetenscentrum anhöriga.
   Google Scholar
• Winqvist, M. 2016. Individualisering, Utvärdering Och Utveckling Av anhörigstöd. [Individualization, Evaluation and Development of Support for Family carers.] Kunskapsöversikt 2016:4. Kalmar: Nationellt kompetenscentrum anhöriga.
   Google Scholar