Social work and Pierre Bourdieu: relevance for and in a Norwegian welfare state context

References

• Ågotnes, G. 2021. “The Forms of Social Capital. Theory and Practice in Community Work.” In Praxeologiske perspektiver. Professorens habitus og kampen for sykepleievitenskap som autonomt fag, edited by K. Lea. & R. Horne, 321–340. Forlaget Hexis.
   Google Scholar
• Askeland, G. A. 2011. Kritiske refleksjoner i sosialt arbeid. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. 2012. Empowerment i helse og sosialfaglig arbeid. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnhaug, I. 2002. “Pierre Bourdieu–Alle Stridigheters Sosiolog.” Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid 22 (3): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3037-2002-03-06.
   Google Scholar
• Botten, G., K. T. Elvebakken, and N. Kildal. 2003. “The Norwegian Welfare State on the Threshold of a New Century.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 31 (2): 81–84. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45137592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977) 2012. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson, 241–258. Greenwood. https://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/sites/socialcapitalgateway.org/files/data/paper/2016/10/18/rbasicsbourdieu1986-theformsofcapital.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992) 2011. “Statens venstre og høyre hånd.” Agora (Oslo, Norway) 29 (1): 166–173. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1500-1571-2011-01-08.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1996. The State Nobility. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1999. The Weight of the World. California: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2014. On the state: lectures at the Collège de France 1989-1992. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. 1997. Sociology for Social Work. Houndsmills: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. 1992. “Doxa and Common Life: In Conversation with Pierre Bourdieu.” New Left Review 191 (1): 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and E. M. Williams. 2005. “Bourdieu and Social Work.” Social Service Review 79 (4): 689–724. https://doi.org/10.1086/491604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervik, R., and N. Kildal. 2016. “From Collective to Individual Responsibility? Changing Problem Definitions of the Welfare State.” In New Contractualism in European Welfare State Policies, edited by R. Ervik and N. Kildal, 93–117. Taylor & Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315597911/new-contractualism-european-welfare-state-policies-nanna-kildal-rune-ervik.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J. 2002. “Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu.” Organizational Research Methods 5 (1): 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102051005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fram, M. S. 2004. “Research for Progressive Change: Bourdieu and Social Work.” Social Service Review 78 (4): 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1086/424544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. 2007a. “Making Social Work More Bourdieusian: Why the Social Professions Should Critically Engage with the Work of Pierre Bourdieu.” European Journal of Social Work 10 (2): 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450701318010.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. 2007b. “The Relevance of Bourdieu for Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 7 (3): 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307084076.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, I. 2004. “Defining Social Work for the 21st Century: The International Federation of Social Workers’ Revised Definition of Social Work.” International Social Work 47 (3): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804043973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindhede, A. L. 2016. “Neighbourhood Renewal, Participation, and Social Capital in Deprived Areas: Unintended Consequences in a Nordic Context.” European Societies 18 (5): 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2016.1226375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, R. 2018. “Offline: Defending the Left Hand of the State.” The Lancet 391 (10139): 2484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31433-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, S. 2019. “Extending Bourdieu for Critical Social Work.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Social Work, edited by S. Webb, 105–114. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S., and C. Swords. 2022. “Responding to the ‘Weight of the World’: Unveiling the ‘Feeling’ Bourdieu in Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 52 (4): 1934–1951. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S., and S. Oltedal. 2017. Teoretiske perspektiver i socialt arbejde. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and N. Mik-Meyer. 2003. At skabe en klient: institutionelle identiteter i socialt arbejde. Latvia: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. C., and S. J. Yanca. 2001. Social Work Practice: A Generalist Approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, M., and J. H. Jonsson. 2018. Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work: Current and Future Challenges. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, N. 2018. “Hvor(for) forsvant velferdsforskningens normative spørsmål?” Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 2 (1): 98–102. https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2018-01-09.
   Google Scholar
• Kondrat, M. E. 2002. “Actor-Centered Social Work: Revisioning “Person-In-environment” Through a Critical Theory Lens.” Social Work 47 (4): 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.4.435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E. 2003. Sosialt arbeid og symbolsk kapital i et senmoderne barnevern. Trondheim: Barnevernets Utviklingssenter i Midt-Norge.
   Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E. 2010. “Fra sosiale problemer til symbolske byrder.” Fontene Forskning 1:112–119. https://fontene.no/forskning/fra-sosiale-problemer-til-symbolske-byrder-6.584.865265.6d69b819c4.
   Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E. 2011. “Social Work Practice and Social Science History.” Social Work and Social Sciences Review 15 (1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1921/095352211X604291.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N. 2017. The Power of Citizens and Professionals in Welfare Encounters. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N., and K. Villadsen. 2007. Magtens former: sociologiske perspektiver på statens møde med borgeren. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nysæther, L. A. 2004. “Kan begrepet sosial kapital anvendes i sosialt arbeid?” Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid 24 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3037-2004-01-06.
   Google Scholar
• Oltedal, S. 2005. Kritisk sosialt arbeid: å analysere i lys av teori og erfaringer. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. 2009. “Ulike forståelser av helhetlig oppfølging i NAV?” Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning 12 (3): 192–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sejersted, F. 2004. “Sosialdemokratiets tidsalder.” Nytt norsk tidsskrift 21 (3–4): 250–263. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3053-2004-03-04-03.
   Google Scholar
• Skjeldal, E. 2021. Kritiske perspektiver på brukermedvirkning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., V. E. Cree, R. MacRae, D. Sharp, E. Wallace, and S. O’Halloran. 2017. “Social Suffering: Changing Organisational Culture in Children and Families Social Work Through Critical Reflection Groups—Insights from Bourdieu.” The British Journal of Social Work 47 (4): 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sønneland, A. M. 2021. “Social Work in a Changing Scandinavian Welfare State: Norway.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education, edited by S. M. Sajid, R. Baikady, C. Sheng-Li, and H. Sakaguchi, 219–231. Palgrave Macmillan. https://web.lincoln.edu.my/pdf/The%20Palgrave%20Handbook%20of%20Global%20Social%20Work%20Education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stray, K. N., and O. J. Thomassen. 2023. “Frontline Discretion from a Bourdieu-Inspired Field Perspective: An Ethnographic Case Study of a Norwegian Activation Measure for Sick-Listed Employees.” European Journal of Social Work 26 (6): 1–14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691457.2023.2167069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L. 2011. “Theorizing Practice Research in Social Work.” Social Work and Social Sciences Review 15 (1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1921/095352211X604318.
   Google Scholar
• Warming, H. 2011. “Children’s Participation and Citizenship in a Global Age: Empowerment, Tokenism or Discriminatory Disciplining?” Social Work & 9 (1): 119–134. http://www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/11/34.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I. 2008. “The Person-In-Environment Approach: Professional Ideology and Practice of Social Workers in Israel.” Social Work 53 (1): 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, W. L. 2017. “Habitus, Symbolic Violence, and Reflexivity: Applying Bourdieu’s Theories to Social Work.” The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 44 (4): 95. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3815.
   Google Scholar
• With, M. L. 2023. En av fem nordmenn har sårbar økonomi. Levekårsundersøkelsens kartlegging av fattigdomsproblemer, Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/levekar/statistikk/fattigdomsproblemer-levekarsundersokelsen/artikler/en-av-fem-nordmenn-har-sarbar-okonomi.
   Google Scholar
• Wolniak, M., and S. Houston. 2023. “A Sociologist in the Field of Social Work: Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory and Its Relevance for Social Work Practice.” Critical and Radical Social Work 11 (2): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021X16455445960144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar