Work Activities as a Resource for Work Organization Design and for Strategic Decisions?

REFERENCES

• Béguin, P. (2006). Taking activity into account during the design process. In R. N. Pikaar & E. A. P. Konigsveld (Eds.), Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics: Proceedings of the IEA2006 Congress,. July 2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Boff, K. F. (2006). Revolutions and shifting paradigms in human factors and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 391–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, F., & Hubault, F. (2013). L'activité, ressource pour l'organisation du travail. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Ergonomie constructive (pp. 89–102). Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, F., & Hubault, F. (2015). Activity as a resource for the development of work organizations. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Constructive ergonomics (pp.79–94). Oxon, UK: CRC Press–Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Carayon, P. (2006). Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 525–535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroly, S., & Barcellini, F. (2013). Le développement de l'activité collective. In P. Falzon, (Ed.), Ergonomie constructive (pp. 33–46). Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Caroly,S., & Barcellini, F. (2015). The development of collective activity. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Constructive ergonomics (pp. 19–32). Oxon, UK: CRC Press–Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Daniellou, F. (2005). The French ergonomists' approach to work activity: Cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 409–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078252
   Google Scholar
• Daniellou, F. (2006). Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design. In R. N. Pikaar & E. A. P. Konigsveld (Eds.), Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics: Proceedings of the IEA2006 Congress, July 2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Darses, F., & Reuzeau, F. (2004). Participation des utilisateurs à la conception des systèmes et dispositifs de travail [Users' participation in work systems and design of devices]. In P. Falzon (ed.), Ergonomie (pp. 405–420). Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Dejours, C. (2003). L’évaluation du travail à l’épreuve du réel [Work evaluation tested by reality]. Paris, France: INRA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Dejours, C. (2004). Sofrimento e prazer no trabalho: A abordagem pela psicopatologia do trabalho [Suffering and pleasure at work: The approach by the psychopathology of work]. In. S. Lancman, & L. I. Sznelwar (Eds.), Christophe Dejours: da psicopatologia à psicodinâmica do trabalho [Christoph Dejours: From psychopathology to psychodynamics of work] (pp. 141–156). Brasília/ Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paralelo15/FIOCRUZ.
   Google Scholar
• Dejours, C., & Gernet, I. (2011). Trabalho, subjetividade e confiança [Work, subjectivity, and confidence]. In L. I. Sznelwar (Ed.)., Saúde dos Bancários [Bank workers' health] (pp. 33–43). São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, C. (2011). Bancos e Produtividade: Entre dinâmica industrial e dinâmica serviçal [Banks and productivity: Industrial or service dynamics]. In L. I. Sznelwar (Ed.), Saúde dos Bancários [Bank workers' health] (pp. 64–82). São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, C. (2013). Économie servicielle et travail: Eléments de doctrine pour une “économie de la cooperation” [Service economy and work: Elements of doctrine for an “economy of cooperation”]. Travailler, 29, 29–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/trav.029.0029
   Google Scholar
• Dudziak, E., Sznelwar, L. I., & Plonski, G. A. (2005). Learning organizations and the paradigm of complexity: Work design approach. In P. Carayon, M. Robertson, B. Kleiner, & P. L. T. Hoonakker (Eds.), Human factors in organisational design and managemen —VIII (pp. 335–340). Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., & Neuman, W.P. (2007). Strategic business value of ergonomics. In R. N. Pikkar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Meeting diversity in ergonomics (pp 17–27). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Falzon, P. (2004). Nature, objectives et connaissances en ergonomie [Nature, aims, and knowledge of ergonomics]. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Ergonomie [Ergonomics] (pp. 17–35). Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Falzon, P. (2013). Pour une ergonomie constructive [Constructive ergonomics: A manifesto]. In P. Falzon (Ed.) Ergonomie constructive [Constructive ergonomics] (pp. 1–15). Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J., & Kerguelen, A. (2006). Understanding and transforming work: The practice of ergonomics. Lyon, France: Editions de l'ANACT.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, H. W. (2005). ODAM and macroergonomics 20 years later: You've come a long way baby! In Carayon, P., Robertson, M., Kleiner, B. & P. L. T. Hoonakker (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design and management—VIII (pp. 25–34). Santa Monica: IEA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, H.W. (2006). Macroergonomic analysis of structure, anthropotechnology, and modification of three classical research methods for macroergonomic application. In R. N. Pikaar & E. A. P. Konigsveld (Eds.), Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics, Proceedings of the IEA2006 Congress, July 2006, Maastricht, Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (1996). De quoi l'ergonomie peut-elle faire l'analyse? [What should ergonomics analyze?]. In F. Daniellou (Ed.), L'ergonomie en quête de ses principes. Débats épistémologiques [Ergonomics in search of its principles. Epistemological debates] (pp. 103–140). Toulouse, France: Octarès Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (2001). Faire de l'ergonomie une pensée [Raising ergonomics to a thought]. In F. Hubault (Ed.), Comprendre que travailler c'est penser, un enjeu industriel de l'intervention ergonomique [Understanding that working is thinking: An industrial stake of ergonomic intervention] (pp. 11–32). Toulouse, France: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (2003). Le travail vaut par la manière dont on en use: Contribution de l'ergonomie à la gestion des ressources humaines [Work value depends on its use: Contributions of ergonomics to human resources management]. In J. Allouche (Ed.), Encyclopédie des ressources humaines (pp. 476–478). Paris, France: Vuibert.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (2008). Can ergonomics empower a new way for value adding management. In L. I. Sznelwar, F. L. Mascia, & U. Montedo (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design and management— Proceedings of the ninth international symposium ODAM (pp. 19–31). Santa Monica, CA; São Paulo, Brazil: IEA Press, Editora Blücher.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (2011). Os desafios relacionados à mobilização da subjetividade na relação de service [Challanges related to the mobiliization of subjectivity in service relationships]. In L.I. Sznelwar (Ed.), (org), Saúde dos bancários [Bank workers' health] (pp. 125–149). São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. (2013). Le travail de management [The work of management]. Travailler, 29, 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/trav.029.0081
   Google Scholar
• Hubault, F. & Du Tertre, C. (2008). Le travail d’évaluation. In F. Hubault (Ed.), Evaluation du travail, travail d’évaluation (pp. 95–114). Toulouse, France: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Imada, A. S. (2007). The value of participation in ergonomics. In R. N. Pikkar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Meeting diversity in ergonomics (pp. 91–98). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kogi, K. (2006). Participatory methods effective for ergonomic workplace improvement, Applied Ergonomics, 37, 547–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konigsveld, E. A. P., Settels, P. J. M., Pikaar, R. N. (2007), Meeting diversity in ergonomics. In R. N. Pikkar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Meeting diversity in ergonomics (pp. 3–12). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, B. (2003). De l'agir organisationnel. Un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l'apprentissage [Organizational action: A standpoint on work, well-being, learning]. Toulouse, France: Octares.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1994). De maquinas y seres vivos: Autopoiesis, la organización de lo vivo [Machines and living organisms: Autopoiesis, organization of the living]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Mispelblom- Beyer, F. (2004). Encadrer est-ce travailler? [Does managing mean working?]. Lyon, France: Cahiers du GDR Cadres.
   Google Scholar
• Montedo, U., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2008). A relação tácita entre a análise ergonômica do trabalho e a teoria da complexidade. [The implicit relationship between ergonomic work analysis and complexity theory]. In Anais do XV Congresso Brasileiro de Ergonomia, Porto Seguro, Nov. 2-6.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1990/1982). Science avec conscience. (nouvelle édition remaniée, coll. Points). Paris, France: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E., & Le Moigne, J.L. (1999). L'intelligence de la complexité. Paris, France: Éditions l'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Pikaar, R. N. (2007). New challenges: Ergonomics in engineering projects in meeting diversity. In R. N. Pikkar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Ergonomics (pp. 29–61). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• St-Vincent, M., Vézina, N., Bellemare, M., Denis, D., Ledoux, É., & Imbeau, D. (2011). L'intervention en ergonomie. Québec, Canada: Multimondes/IRSST.
   Google Scholar
• Sznelwar, L. I. (2007). Ergonomics and work—Different approaches and challenges for the future. In R. N. Pikkar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Meeting diversity in ergonomics (pp. 111–127). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sznelwar, L. I. (2013). Quando trabalhar é ser protagonista e o protagonismo do trabalho [When working is being protagonist and the protagonism of work]. Thesis (livre-docência), University of São Paulo. 161 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems—Occasional paper n° 2, June 1981. Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre. 67 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, P., Konigsveld, E. A. P., & Molenbroek, J. F. (2006). Positive outcomes of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort and higher productivity. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 537–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2005). Participation and its role in human factors. In P. Carayon, M. Robertson, B. Kleiner, & P. L. T. Hoonakker (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design and management—VIII (pp. 53–62). Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press, pp. 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, A. (1996). Questions épistémologiques en ergonomie et en analyse du travail [Epistemological issues in ergonomics and work analysis]. In F. Daniellou (Ed.), L'ergonomie en quête de ses principes. Débats épistémologiques [Ergonomics in search of its principles. Epistemological debates] (pp. 29–56). Toulouse, France: Octarès Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Zarifian, P. (2000). Valeur de service et compétence [Service value and competence]. In Relation de service: Regards croisés [Service relationship: Perspectives]. Cahiers du genre, 28 (pp. 71–96). Paris, France: L'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar