A dialogue between innovation studies of economic development and transition studies: an illustration from Argentina’s agriculture sector

References

• Andersen, A., A. Marin, and E. Simensen. 2018. “Innovation in Natural Resource-Based Industries: A Pathway to Development? Introduction to Special Issue.” Innovation and Development 8 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2018.1439293.
   Google Scholar
• Anllo, G., R. Bisang, and J. Katz. 2015. Aprendiendo con el agro argentino. Santiago de Chile: FCE-UBA/Universidad de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. 2010. “Innovation Capabilities and Directions of Development”, STEPS Working Paper 33, Brighton: STEPS Centre, UK. https://steps-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/bell-paper-33.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1993. “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries.” Industrial and Corporate Change 2 (2): 157–210. doi:10.1093/icc/2.2.157.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1995. “The Development of Technological Capabilities.” In Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, edited by I. UL-HAQUE, 69–101. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., D. Angel, and A. J. Wieczorek. 2009. “Sustainability Transitions in Developing Asia: Are Alternative Development Pathways Likely?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (2): 215–217. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisang, R., G. Anlló, and M. Campi. 2008. “Una revolución (no tan) silenciosa. Claves para repensar el agro en Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 48: 165–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27667836.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang, R., G. Anlló, and M. Campi. 2015. Políticas tecnológicas para la innovación: la producción agrícola argentina. Santiago de Chile: Ciepla.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarli, T., M. Savona, and J. Thorpe. 2021. “Innovation for Inclusive Structural Change.” In The Challenges of Technology and Economic Catch-Up in Emerging Economies, edited by Lee, Jeong- Dong, Lee, Keun, Meissner, Dirk, Radosevic, Slavo and Vonortas, Nicholas. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cimoli, M., and G. Porcile. 2009. “Sources of Learning Paths and Technological Capabilities: An Introductory Roadmap of Development Processes.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18 (7): 675–694. doi:10.1080/10438590802564600.
   Google Scholar
• Cimoli, M., and G. Porcile. 2011. Learning, Technological Capabilities, and Structural Dynamics. In The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. 2010. “Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 1: 129–213. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X.
   Google Scholar
• Crépon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairessec. 1998. “Research, Innovation And Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and new Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi:10.1080/10438599800000031
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study.” Research Policy 31 (8-9): 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36: 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gras, C., and V. y Hernández. 2016. Radiografía del nuevo campo argentino. Del terrateniente al empresario transnacional. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Hallak, R., G. Assaker, P. O’Connor, and C. Lee. 2018. “Firm Performance in the Upscale Restaurant Sector: The Effects of Resilience, Creative Self-Efficacy, Innovation and Industry Experience.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 40: 229–240. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., D. Rodrik, and A. Velasco. 2006. “Getting the Diagnosis Right.” Finance & Development 43 (1): 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., J. D. Sachs, J. E. Stiglitz, G. Soros, and M. Humphreys. 2007. Escaping the Resource Curse. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbs, J., and R. Wacziarg. 2003. “Stages of Diversification.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 63–86. doi:10.1257/000282803321455160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INDEC. 2018. Cuestionario del censista, Censo Nacional Agropecuario.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. M. 1984. “Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Further Reflections on a Comparative Case-Study Program.” Journal of Development Economics 16 (1–2): 13–37. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(84)90100-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–198. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, L. 1998. “Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor.” Organization Science 9 (4): 506–521. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.4.506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klevorick, A. K., R. C. Levin, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter. 1995. “On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities.” Research Policy 24 (2): 185–205. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Frank W. Geels, Florian Kern, Jochen Markard, Elsie Onsongo, Anna Wieczorek, Floortje Alkemade, et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konovsky, M. A. 2000. “Understanding Procedural Justice and its Impact on Business Organizations.” Journal of Management 26 (3): 489–511. doi:10.1177/014920630002600306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1985. “Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction.” The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope 19: 19–60.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2002. “Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production.” Research Policy 31 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 1997. “Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1): 83–118. doi:10.1093/icc/6.1.83.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A., and A. Smith. 2011. Towards a framework for analysing the transformation of Natural Resource-based industries in Latin America: the role of alternatives. http://nrpathways.wix.com/home.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A., and L. Stubrin. 2015. Oportunidades y desafíos para convertirse en un innovador mundial en Recursos Naturales (RN). El caso de las empresas de semillas en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Documento de Trabajo CENIT.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, A., L. I. Stubrin, and R. Palacín Roitbarg. 2022. “Growing from the South in the Seed Market: Grupo Don Mario.” Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies 12(4): 656-672.. doi:10.1108/JADEE-11-2021-0307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. 2009. “Bio-Hegemony: The Political Economy of Agricultural Biotechnology in Argentina.” Journal of Latin American Studies 41: 27–57. doi:10.1017/S0022216X08005105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., and D. Mulvaney. 2013. “The Political Economy of the ‘Just Transition’.” The Geographical Journal 179 (2): 132–140. doi:10.1111/geoj.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, José Antonio. 2017. ‘Commodity-Led Development in Latin America’ in Alternative Pathways to Sustainable Development: Lessons from Latin America, International Development Policy series No.9. Geneva, Boston, MA: Graduate Institute Publications, Brill-Nijhoff, pp. 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Oesterheld, M. 2008. “Impacto de la agricultura sobre los ecosistemas: fundamentos ecológicos y problemas más relevantes.” Ecología austral 18 (3): 337–346.
   Google Scholar
• Pengue, Walter A. 2009. “Cuestiones económico-ambientales de las transformaciones agrícolas en las pampas.” Problemas del Desarrollo 40 (157): 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, R. 1950. “The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems.” reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Prebisch, R. 1954. Estímulo de la demanda, las inversiones y la aceleración del ritmo de crecimiento, 11–23. New York: En: Estudio económico de América Latina, 1954-E/CN. 12/362/Rev. 1-1954.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2 Resources and Technology, edited by S. Rayner, and L. Malone, 327–399. Washington, DC: Batelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. 1998. “The Usefulness of Evolutionary Models for Explaining Innovation. The Case of the Netherlands in the Nineteenth Century.” History and Technology, an International Journal 14 (3): 173–200. doi:10.1080/07341519808581928
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W., and F. W. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Kemmis, D. 2013. How About Those METS. Leveraging Australia’s Mining Equipment, Technology and Services Sector. Sydney: Minerals Council of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Seifu, M., A. van Paassen, L. Klerkx, and C. Leeuwis. 2020. “Anchoring Innovation Methodologies to ‘go-to-Scale’; a Framework to Guide Agricultural Research for Development.” Agricultural Systems 182: 102810. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2007. “Translating Sustainabilities Between Green Niches and Socio Technical Regimes.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450. doi:10.1080/09537320701403334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and R. Raven. 2012. “What is Protective Space? Reconsidering Niches in Transitions to Sustainability.” Research Policy 41: 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2011. “Pluralising Progress: From Integrative Transitions to Transformative Diversity.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 82–88. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.005.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2018. “Latin American Development: Perspectives and Debates.” Latin America Since the Left Turn. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 13–32. doi:10.9783/9780812294552-002.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh, J. C. 2007. “Evolutionary Thinking in Environmental Economics.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17 (5): 521–549. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0054-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzoli, F. 2018. “¿Límites ecológicos y fronteras tecnológicas en el negocio agrícola? Agricultura y ambiente en los sectores agrarios medios del noroeste argentino.” Población & Sociedad 25 (1): 163–195. doi:10.19137/pys-2018-250106
   Google Scholar