Effect of begging call playbacks on growth of great tit, Parus major, nestlings

References

• Aslan A, Yavuz M. 2010. Clutch and egg size variation, and productivity of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): effects of temperature, rainfall, and humidity. Turk J Zool. 34:255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson H, Rydén O. 1983. Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 12:243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budden AE, Wright J. 2005. Learning during competitive positioning in the nest: do nestlings use ideal free ‘foraging’ tactics? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58:227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford JE, Friedrich TJ, Yasukawa K. 1998. Response to playback of nestling begging in the red-winged blackbird, Agelaius phoeniceus. Anim Behav. 56:555–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PA, Kacelnik A, Wright J. 1996. Chick begging as a signal: are nestling honest? Behav Ecol. 2:178–182.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell D. 1994. Experimental evidence that nestling begging behavior incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:161–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinde CA, Kilner RM. 2007. Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care. Proc R Soc B 274:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilner R, Johnstone RA. 1997. Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? Trends Ecol Evol. 12:11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KJ. 2013. Influence of begging call playbacks on parents and nestling in great tit (Parus major) [ MSc. thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SN, Kee WK, Shin KI, Kafatos M, Seo DJ, Kwak HB. 2010. Comparison of spatial interpolation techniques for predicting climate factors in Korea. For Sci Tech. 6:97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kölliker M, Richner H. 2004. Navigation in a cup: chick positioning in great tit, Parus major, nests. Anim Behav. 68:941–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölliker M, Richner H, Werner I, Heeb P. 1998. Begging signals and biparental care: nestling choice between parental feeding locations. Anim Behav. 55:215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak DA, Lee WK, Son Y, Choi S, Yoo S, Chung DJ, Lee SH, Kim SH, Choi JK, Lee YJ, Byun WH. 2012. Predicting distributional change of forest cover and volume in future climate of South Korea. For Sci Tech. 8:105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Leech SM, Leonard ML. 1996. Is there an energetic cost to begging in nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)? Proc R Soc Lond B 263:983–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard M, Horn A. 1996. Provisioning rules in tree swallow. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotem A. 1998. Differences in begging behavior between barn swallow, Hirundo rustica, nestlings. Anim Behav. 55:809–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan Jr. V, Ketterson E. 2001. Current ornithology Vol. 16. New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Price K. 1998. Benefits of begging for yellow-headed blackbird nestlings. Anim Behav. 56:571–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price K, Harvey H, Ydenberg R. 1996. Begging tactics of nestling yellow-headed blackbirds, Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus, in relation to need. Anim Behav. 51:421–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhim SJ, Son SH, Kim KJ. 2011. Breeding ecology of tits Parus spp. using artificial nest boxes in a coniferous forest over a five-year period. For Sci Tech. 7:141–144.
   Google Scholar
• Shin MY, Lee DK. 2008. Long-term prediction of forest sustainability of the natural deciduous forest in Pyungchang area of Gangwon province, Korea. For Sci Tech. 4:28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Son SH, Kim KJ, Hwang HS, Rhim SJ. 2012. Relationship between atmospheric conditions and breeding ecology of tits in artificial nest boxes. J Anim Vet Adv. 11:3682–3686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarwater CE, Kelley JP, Brawn JD. 2009. Parental response to elevated begging in a high predation, tropical environment. Anim Behav. 78:1239–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst S, Tinbergen JM. 1997. Clutch size and parental effort in the great tit Parus major. Ardea 85:111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Both C, Cotton PA, Bryant D. 1998. Quality vs. quantity: energetic and nutritional trade-offs in parental provisioning strategies. J Anim Ecol. 67: 620–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Hinde C, Fazey I, Both C. 2002. Begging signals more than just short-term need: cryptic effects of brood size in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 52:74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar