Nutrient stocks of Japanese blue oak (Quercus glauca Thunb.) stands on different soil parent materials

References

• Abella SR, Springer JD. 2008. Canopy-tree influences along a soil material gradient in Pinus ponderosa-Quercus gambelii forests, northern Arizona. J Torr Bot Soc. 135(1):26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J, Chang H, Han SH, Khamzina A, Son Y. 2020. Changes in basic soil properties and enzyme activities along an afforestation series on the dry Aral Sea Bed, Kazakhstan. For Sci Technol. 16(1):21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Augusto L, Achat DL, Jonard M, Vidal D, Ringeval B. 2017. Soil parent material-a major driver of plant nutrient limitations in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol. 23(9):3808–3824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusto L, Meredieu C, Bert D, Trichet P, Porté A, Bosc A, Lagane F, Loustau D, Pellerin S, Danjon F, et al. 2008. Improving models of forest nutrient export with equations that predict the nutrient concentration of tree compartments. Ann for Sci. 65(8):808–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron-Gafford GA, Will RE, Burkes EC, Shiver B, Teskey RO. 2003. Nutrient concentrations and contents, and their relation to stem growth, of intensively managed Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different planting densities. For Sci. 49(2):291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Berg B, Laskowski R. 2006. Litter decomposition: guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res. 38:227–261.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley D, Giardina C. 1998. Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry. 43:89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Christophe C, Gil K, Laurent SA, Paul-Oliver R, Marie-Pierre T. 2017. Relationship between soil nutritive resources and the growth and mineral nutrition of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) stand along a soil sequence. CATENA. 155:156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahm WJ, Riebe CS, Lukens CE, Araki S. 2014. Bedrock composition regulates mountain ecosystems and landscape evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111(9):3338–3343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han YS, Lee EP, Park JH, Lee SY, Lee SI, You YH. 2018. Organic carbon distribution and cycling in the Quercus glauca forest at Gotjawal wetland, Jeju island Korea. J Ecol Environ. 42:8.
   Google Scholar
• Kalra YP, Maynard DG. 1991. Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Northwest region, information. Report. NOR-X-319. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Northern Forestry Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C. 1999. Aboveground nutrient distribution in pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Kor For Soc. 88(2):266–272.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C, Baek G, Yoo BO, Jung SY, Lee KS, An KW. 2019. Comaprison of allometric equations and biomass expansion factors for six evergreen broad-leaved trees in subtropical forests in southern Korea. J Sus For. 38 (3):199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kim S, Lee J, Chang H, Roh Y, An J, Son Y. 2019. Development of a forest carbon and nitrogen model: pilot application for a Pinus densiflora forest in Central Korea. For Sci Technol. 15(4):202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Forest Research Institute. 2010. Survey manual for biomass and soil carbon. Seoul, Korea: KFRI.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbasli M, Makineci E, Keten A, Beskardes V, Özdemir E. 2017. Effects of parent material, stand type and oak species on defoliation of coppice-originated oak (Quercus spp.) forests in Northern Turkish Thrace. Bosque. 38(2):299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JM, Medina AL, Neary DG, Tecle A. 2015. The influence of parent material on vegetation response 15 years after the Dude fire Arizona. Forests. 6(12):613–635.
   Google Scholar
• Leuschner C, Meier IC, Hertel D. 2006. On the niche breadth of Fagus sylvatica: soil nutrient status in 50 central European beech stands on a broad range of bedrock types. Ann For Sci. 63(4):355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Wen L, Zhang W, Yang L, Xiao K, Chen H, Wang K. 2017. Afforestation effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools modulated by lithology. For Ecol Manag. 400:85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek RS IV, Richardson JB. 2020. Investigating surficial geologic control on soil properties, inorganic nutrient uptake, and northern hardwood growth in western Massachusetts USA. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 20: 901–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JA, Hamilton DA Jr, Xiao Y, Byrne J. 2004. Bedrock type significantly affects individual tree mortality for various conifers in the inland Northwest, USA. Can J For Res. 34(1):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff JC, Reynolds R, Sanford RL Jr, Fernandez D, Lamothe P. 2006. Controls of bedrock geochemistry on soil and plant nutrients in southeastern Utah. Ecosystems. 9(6):879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Eimil-Fraga C, Gómez-García E, García-Villabrille JD, Rojo-Alboreca A, Muñoz F, Oliveira N, Sixto H, Pérez-Cruzado C. 2018. Exploring the factors affecting carbon and nutrient concentrations in tree biomass components in natural forests, forest plantations and short rotation forestry. For Ecosyst. 5:35.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT Statistical software. Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shen G, Moore JA, Hatch CR. 2001. The effect of nitrogen fertilization, rock type, and habitat type on individual tree mortality. For Sci. 47(2):203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Tripler CE, Kaushal SS, Likens GE, Walter MT. 2006. Patterns in potassium dynamics in forest ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 9(4):451–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma AK, Garkoti SC. 2019. Population structure, soil characteristics and carbon stock of the regenerating banj oak forests in Almore Central Himalaya. For Sci Technol. 15(3):117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Vestin JLK, Söderberg U, Bylund D, Nambu K, van Hees PAW, Haslinger E, Ottner F, Lundström US. 2013. The influence of alkaline and non-alkaline parent material on Norway spruce tree chemical composition and growth rate. Plant Soil. 370(1–2):103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Węgiel A, Bielinis E, Polowy K. 2018. Macronutrient stocks in Scots pine stands of different densities. Forests. 9(10):593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White KP, Coleman M, Page-Dumroese DS, Gessler PE, Kimsey M, Shaw T. 2012. Examining soil parent material influence over Douglas-fir stem growth response of fertilization: taking advantage of information from spatiotemporally distributed experiments. For Ecol Manag. 286:10–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Zhu J, Xu S, Zheng X. 2018. Conversion from temperate secondary forests into plantations (Larix spp.): impact on belowground carbon and nutrient pools in northeastern China. Land Degrad Dev. 29(11):4129–4139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar