Optimum plant density and harvest age for maximizing productivity and minimizing competition in a Calliandra short-rotation-coppice plantation in West Java, Indonesia

References

• Abdulah L. 2019. The growth and yield of Calliandra callothyrsus trees as biomass-based energy feedstock. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 308(1):012078.
   Google Scholar
• Adler PB, Smull D, Beard KH, Choi RT, Furniss T, Kulmatiski A, Meiners JM, Tredennick AT, Veblen KE. 2018. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecol Lett. 21(9):1319–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awty-Carroll D, Hauck B, Clifton-Brown J, Robson P. 2020. Allelopathic and intraspecific growth competition effects establishment of direct sown Miscanthus. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 12(6):396–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacenetti J, Bergante S, Facciotto G, Fiala M. 2016. Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management. Biomass Bioenergy. 94:209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. 2006. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 57:233–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Wang T, Xiao Y, Zhou B. 2014. The interspecific competition between Humulus scandens and Alternanthera philoxeroides. J Plant Interact. 9(1):194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper BB, Castelli JP. 2007. Evaluating plant-soil feedback together with competition in a serpentine grassland. Ecol Lett. 10(5):394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri A, Bak F, Garcia-Lemos AM, Weiner J, Nicolaisen MH, Nybroe O. 2020. Effects of intra- and interspecific plant density on rhizosphere bacterial communities. Front Microbiol. 11:1045–1014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craine JM, Dybzinski R. 2013. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Funct Ecol. 27(4):833–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou I, Rutz D. 2015. Sustainable Short Rotation Coppice. A Handbook. D. Rutz (ed.); (Issue November). Munich, Germany:WIP Renewable Energies.
   Google Scholar
• Erfanifard Y, Pourhashemi M, Alimahmoodi Sarab S. 2021. The impact of coppice management on spatial structure and intraspecific interactions of Brant’s oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) semi-arid woodlands. Acta Oecologica. 113:103787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez C, Monnier Y, Santonja M, Gallet C, Weston LA, Prévosto B, Saunier A, Baldy V, Bousquet-Mélou A. 2016. The impact of competition and allelopathy on the trade-off between plant defense and growth in two contrasting tree species. Front Plant Sci. 7:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foli EG, Alder D, Miller HG, Swaine MD. 2003. Modelling growth spacing requirements for some tropical forest tree species. For Ecol Manage. 173(1-3):79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertes A, Oliveira N, Cañellas I, Sixto H, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R. 2021. An economic overview of Populus spp. in short rotation coppice systems under Mediterranean conditions: an assessment tool for decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 151:111577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Yan L, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, Li C. 2019. Plant-plant interactions and N fertilization shape soil bacterial and fungal communities. Soil Biol Biochem. 128:127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk S, Knoke T, Wittkopf S. 2014. Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass - a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 29:435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrati RL, Nurrohmah SH. 2019. Breeding for better growth of Calliandra calothyrsus Meissn., a fast growing legume for wood-energy. JPerbenihanTanHutan. 7(1):13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hortal S, Lozano YM, Bastida F, Armas C, Moreno JL, Garcia C, Pugnaire FI. 2017. Plant-plant competition outcomes are modulated by plant effects on the soil bacterial community. Sci Rep. 7(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang X, Chaparro JM, Reardon KF, Zhang R, Shen Q, Vivanco JM. 2014. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities 1. Botany. 92(4):267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki K, Kiviste A, Korjus H. 2015. Analysis of individual tree competition effect on diameter growth of silver birch in Estonia. Forest Syst. 24(2):e023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, H, (ed.), 2011. Short Rotation Forestry: review of growth and environmental impacts. Forest Research Monograph, 2. Forest Research Surrey, 212 pp National Development Plan Council of Indoneisa (Bappenas). Decree Number 11/2020. Strategic plan of Bappenas. year 2020–2024
   Google Scholar
• Moya R, Tenorio C, Oporto G. 2019. Short rotation wood crops in Latin American: a review on status and potential uses as biofuel. Energies. 12(4):705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllerová J, Pejcha V, Altman J, Plener T, Dörner P, Doležal J. 2016. Detecting coppice legacies from tree growth. PLoS One. 11(1):e0147205–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Development Plan Council of Indoneisa (Bappenas). Decree Number 11/2020. Strategic plan of Bappenas. year 2020–2024.
   Google Scholar
• Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 79 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Energi Nasional (Government Regulations of the Republic of Indonesia Number 79 Year 2014 on National Energy Policy), Pub. L. No. 79, 1 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Izquierdo L, Zabal-Aguirre M, González-Martínez SC, Buée M, Verdú M, Rincón A, Goberna M. 2019. Plant intraspecific variation modulates nutrient cycling through its below ground rhizospheric microbiome. J Ecol. 107(4):1594–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierik R, Mommer L, Voesenek LACJ. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of plant competition: neighbour detection and response strategies. Funct Ecol. 27(4):841–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proe MF, Craig J, Gri J, Wilson A, Reid E. 1999. Comparison of biomass production in coppice and single stem woodland management systems on an imperfectly drained gley soil in central Scotland. Biomass Bioenergy. 17(2):141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020., Pub. L. No. 18, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Simon J, Schmidt S. 2017. Editorial: plant competition in a changing world. Front Plant Sci. 8(April):651–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song M, Hu Q, Tian Y, Ouyang H. 2012. Seasonal patterns of root and shoot interactions in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. J Plant Ecol. 5(2):182–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Cacot E, Mihelic M, Nestorovski L, Mederski P, Tolosana E. 2016. Techniques and productivity of coppice harvesting operations in Europe: a meta-analysis of available data. Ann for Sci. 73(4):1125–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvanainen T, Kaartinen K, Pukkala T, Maltamo M. 2007. Comparison of approaches to integrate energy wood estimation into the Finnish compartment inventory system. Silva Fenn. 41(1):123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenorio C, Moya R, Ortiz-Malavassi E, Arias D. 2019. Production and regression models for biomass and carbon captured in Gmelina arborea Roxb. Trees in short rotation coppice plantations in Costa Rica. Forests. 10(7):593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres NV, Santos G. 2015. The (mathematical) modeling process in biosciences. Front Genet. 6(DEC):354–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verlinden MS, Broeckx LS, Ceulemans R. 2015. First vs. second rotation of a poplar short rotation coppice: above-ground biomass productivity and shoot dynamics. Biomass Bioenergy. 73:174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidenhamer JD, Montgomery TM, Cipollini DF, Weston PA, Mohney BK. 2019. Plant density and rhizosphere chemistry: does marigold root exudate composition respond to intra- and interspecific competition? J Chem Ecol. 45(5-6):525–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner J. 1993. Competition among plants. Treballs de La SCB. 44:99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Widyati E, Darwiati W, Yulianti M. 2019. Land management in optimizing productivity of limited land to deal with rural food, feed and fuel (3F) security. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 394(1):012068–012066.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Liu W, Chen C. 2016. Below-ground interspecific competition for water in a rubber agroforestry system may enhance water utilization in plants. Sci Rep. 6:19502–19513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu CY, Turnbull MH, Tissue DT, Lewis JD, Carson R, Schuster WSF, Whitehead D, Walcroft AS, Li J, Griffin KL. 2012. Age-related decline of stand biomass accumulation is primarily due to mortality and not to reduction in NPP associated with individual tree physiology, tree growth or stand structure in a Quercus-dominated forest. J Ecol. 100(2):428–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X-z, Zhang W, He Q. 2019. Effects of intraspesific competition on growth, architecture and biomass allocation of Quercus liaotungensis. J Plant Interact. 14(1):284–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Cheng X, Wu R, Han H, Kang F, Zhu J, Tian P. 2018. Effect of intraspecific competition on biomass partitioning of Larix principis-rupprechtii. J Plant Interact. 13(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar