Use of the Forest Environment Transfer Tax for forest data development and exchange: evidence from all 47 prefectures in Japan

References

• Alix-Garcia J, Wolff H. 2014. Payment for ecosystem services from forests. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 6(1):361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2021. The 6th Science, Technology, and Innovation Basic Plan (in Japanese). [accessed 2021 October 10]. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/6honbun.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Tanaka K. 2007. Maintenance of local forest environment by a prefectural tax toward theoretical basis of local forest environment tax. Jpn J Real Estate Sci. 21(1):116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Davies HJ, Doick KJ, Hudson MD, Schreckenberg K. 2017. Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests. Environ Res. 156:97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara M, Hyakumura K, Yokota Y. 2014. REDD+ initiatives for safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services: harmonizing sets of standards for national application. J For Res. 19(5):427–436.
   Google Scholar
• Forestry Agency. 2021. Forest and forestry basic plan (in Japanese). [accessed 2021 October 12]. https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/kikaku/plan/attach/pdf/index-4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazoul J, Garcia C, Kushalappa CG. 2009. Landscape labelling: a concept for next-generation payment for ecosystem service schemes. For Ecol Manage. 258(9):1889–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He P, Zhang B. 2018. Environmental tax, polluting plants’ strategies and effectiveness: evidence from China. J Pol Anal Manage. 37(3):493–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram JC, Wilkie D, Clements T, McNab RB, Nelson F, Baur EH, Sachedina HT, Peterson DD, Foley CAH. 2014. Evidence of payments for ecosystem services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosyst Serv. 7:10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaki R. 2019. Benefits and burdens of forest environment tax. Environ Inf Sci. 48(1):43–48 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaki R, Matsuda S. 2021. Message for solidarity: a Japanese perspective on the payment for forest ecosystem services developed over centuries of history. Sustainability. 13(22):12846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang-Hwan J, So-Hee P, JaChoon K, Taewoo R, Lim EM, Yeo-Chang Y. 2020. Preferences for ecosystem services provided by urban forests in South Korea. For Sci Technol. 16(2):86–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kajima S, Uchiyama Y, Kohsaka R. 2020. Private forest landowners’ awareness of forest boundaries: case study in Japan. J For Res. 25(5):299–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kishioka T, Uchiyama Y, Kohsaka R. 2022. Status and trends of forest environmental tax for wildlife management in japanese prefectures. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 104(4). (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kohsaka R. 2021. Integrated knowledge for policies on science, technology, innovation, and consensus building: is upgrade of society possible?. In: Mizuno K, editor. Future direction of economy, Soseisha Co., Ltd (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kohsaka R, Kohyama S. 2022. State of the art review on land-use policy: changes in forests, agricultural lands and renewable energy of Japan. Land. 11(5):624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohsaka R, Osawa T, Uchiyama Y. 2020. Forest environment transfer tax and urban-rural collaboration: case of Chichibu City and Toshima District in Japan. J Jpn for Soc. 102(2):127–132 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kohsaka R, Uchiyama Y. 2019. Forest environmental taxes at multi-layer national and prefectural levels: comparisons of 37 prefectures survey results in Japan. J Jpn for Soc. 101(5):246–252 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kohsaka R, Uchiyama Y. 2021. Forest environment transfer tax, prefectural forest policy, and support for municipalities. J Jpn for Soc. 103(2):134–144 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Lin JC, Chiou CR, Chan WH, Wu MS. 2021. Public perception of forest ecosystem services in Taiwan. J For Res. 26(5): 344-350.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. 2021. The strategy for sustainable food systems, MeaDRI (in Japanese). [accessed 2021 October 12]. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/kanbo/kankyo/seisaku/midori/attach/pdf/index-7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake Y, Kimoto S, Uchiyama Y, Kohsaka R. 2022. Income change and inter-farmer relations through conservation agriculture in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan: empirical analysis of economic and behavioral factors. Land. 11(2):245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama K, Shirai M, Yamada M. 2019. Effects of environmental taxes on forest conservation: case of the water resources conservation fund in Toyota City. In: Keiko Nakayama and Yuzuru Miyata (eds.), Theoretical and empirical analysis in environmental economics. Singapore: Springer; p. 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Obeng EA, Aguilar FX. 2018. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services. J Environ Manage. 206:458–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JM, Lee YK, Lee JS. 2022. A comparative analysis of forest area differences between statistics information and spatial thematic maps. For Sci Technol. 18(2):76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Redford KH, Adams WM. 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conserv Biol. 23(4):785–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki H, Kakizawa H, Hirata K, Tamura N. 2020. The current state of and future trends in the forest administration of municipalities: analysis of the postal questionnaire survey. J For Econ. 66:51–60 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Tanaka K. 2021. Models explaining the levels of forest environmental taxes and other PES schemes in Japan. Forests. 12(6):685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teraoka Y. 2020. ICT for regional forestry strategy, series of forestry improvement 195, association of forestry improvement (in Japanese). p. 134. Tokyo, Japan: Association of Forestry Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Uchiyama Y, Kohsaka R. 2016. Analysis of the distribution of forest management areas by the forest environmental tax in Ishikawa prefecture, Japan. Int J For Res. 2016:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wakiyama T, Lenzen M, Kadoya T, Takeuchi Y, Nansai K. 2021. Forest tax payment responsibility from the forest service footprint perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 55(5):3165–3174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunder S, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. 2009. Payments for ecosystem services: a new way of conserving biodiversity in forests. J Sustain For. 28(3-5):576–596.
   Google Scholar