1,247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Detection of responses to drought stress of dalbergia cochinchinensis seedlings using the physiological parameters and thermal imaging

, &
Pages 105-115 | Received 19 Oct 2022, Accepted 28 Feb 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

References

  • Ackerly D, Knight C, Weiss S, Barton K, Starmer K. 2002. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia. 130(3):449–457.
  • Banks JM. 2018. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool to identify drought stress in Acer genotypes. Environ Exp Bot. 155:118–127.
  • Bannister P. 1986. Observations on water potentials and drought resistance of trees and shrubs after a period of summer drought around Dunedin, New Zealand. NZ J Bot. 24(3):387–392.
  • Baranowski P, Jedryczka M, Mazurek W, Babula-Skowronska D, Siedliska A, Kaczmarek J. 2015. Hyperspectral and thermal imaging of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) response to fungal species of the genus Alternaria. PLoS One. 10(3):e0122913.
  • Bongers F, Poorter L, Hawthorne WD. 2004. The forests of Upper Guinea: gradients in large species composition. In: Poorter L, Bongers F, Kouamé FN, Hawthorne WD, editors. Biodiversity of West African forests: an ecological atlas of woody plant species. Wallingford: CABI International; p. 41–52.
  • Bongers F, Poorter L, Rompaey R, Parren MPE. 1999. Distribution of twelve moist forest canopy tree species in Liberia and Cote d’Ivoire: response curves to a climatic gradient. J Veg Sci. 10(3):371–382.
  • Cernusak LA, Aranda J, Marshall JD, Winter K. 2007. Large variation in whole-plant water-use efficiency among tropical tree species. New Phytol. 173(2):294–305.
  • Chaerle L, Van Der Straeten D. 2001. Seeing is believing: imaging techniques to monitor plant health. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Struct Expr. 1519(3):153–166.
  • Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol. 30(3):239–264.
  • Chaves ARM, Ten-Caten A, Pinheiro HA, Ribeiro A, DaMatta FM. 2008. Seasonal changes in photoprotective mechanisms of leaves from shaded and unshaded field-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) trees. Trees. 22(3):351–361.
  • Cheesman AW, Winter K. 2013. Growth response and acclimation of CO2 exchange characteristics to elevated temperatures in tropical tree seedlings. J Exp Bot. 64(12):3817–3828.
  • Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 1995. Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecol Monogr. 65(4):419–439.
  • Cordeiro YEM, Pinheiro HA, dos Santos Filho BG, Corrêa SS, e Silva JRR, Dias-Filho MB. 2009. Physiological and morphological responses of young mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) plants to drought. For Ecol Manage. 258(7):1449–1455.
  • Cui YY, Pandey DM, Hahn EJ, Paek KY. 2004. Effect of drought on physiological aspects of Crassulacean acid metabolism in Doritaenopsis. Plant Sci. 167(6):1219–1226.
  • Dai A. 2011. Drought under global warming: a review. WIREs Clim Change. 2(1):45–65.
  • Dale JE. 1988. The control of leaf expansion. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 39(1):267–295.
  • Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Sheldon KS, Ghalambor CK, Haak DC, Martin PR. 2008. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(18):6668–6672.
  • Ditmarová L, Kurjak D, Palmroth S, Kmet J, Strelcová K. 2010. Physiological responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings to drought stress. Tree Physiol. 30(2):205–213.
  • Doughty CE, Goulden ML. 2008. Are tropical forests near a high temperature threshold? J Geophys Res. 113(G1):.
  • Dünisch O, Erbreich M, Eilers T. 2003. Water balance and water potentials of a monoculture and an enrichment plantation of Carapa guianensis Aubl. in the Central Amazon. For Ecol Manage. 172(2-3):355–367.
  • El-Sharkawy MA. 2007. Physiological characteristics of cassava tolerance to prolonged drought in the tropics: implications for breeding cultivars adapted to seasonally dry and semiarid environments. Braz J Plant Physiol. 19(4):257–286.
  • Engelbrecht BMJ, Kursar TA. 2003. Comparative drought resistance of seedlings of 28 species of co-occurring tropical woody plants. Oecologia. 136(3):383–393.
  • Fern K. 2014. Useful tropical plants database. http://tropical.theferns.info
  • Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(25):10343–10347.
  • Fuentes S, De Bei R, Pech J, Tyerman S. 2012. Computational water stress indices obtained from thermal image analysis of grapevine canopies. Irrig Sci. 30(6):523–536.
  • Garg A, Bordoloi S, Ganesan SP, Sekharan S, Sahoo L. 2020. A relook into plant wilting: observational evidence based on unsaturated soil–plant-photosynthesis interaction. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–15.
  • Gentry AH. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 75(1):1–34.
  • Givnish TJ, Vermeij GJ. 1976. Sizes and shapes of Liane leaves. Am Nat. 110(975):743–778.
  • Grant OM, Chaves MM, Jones HG. 2006. Optimizing thermal imaging as a technique for detecting stomatal closure induced by drought stress under greenhouse conditions. Physiol Plant. 127(3):507–518.
  • Grant OM, Ochagavía H, Baluja J, Diago M, Tardáguila J. 2016. Thermal imaging to detect spatial and temporal variation in the water status of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 91(1):43–54.
  • Grant OM, Tronina Ł, Jones HG, Chaves MM. 2007. Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. J Exp Bot. 58(4):815–825.
  • Hall J, Swaine MD. 1976. Classification and ecology of closed-canopy forest in Ghana. J Ecol. 64(3):913–951.
  • Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature. 424(6951):901–908.
  • Holmgren M, Poorter L. 2007. Does a ruderal strategy dominate the endemic flora of the West African forests? J Biogeogr. 34(6):1100–1111.
  • Hughes NM, Morley CB, Smith WK. 2007. Coordination of anthocyanin decline and photosynthetic maturation in juvenile leaves of three deciduous tree species. New Phytol. 175(4):675–685.
  • Jarvis AJ, Davies WJ. 1998. Modelling stomatal responses to soil and atmospheric drought. J Exp Bot. 49(Special):399–406.
  • Jensen KH, Zwieniecki MA. 2013. Physical limits to leaf size in tall trees. Phys Rev Lett. 110(1):018104.
  • Jimenez-Bello MA, Ballester C, Castel JR, Intrigliolo DS. 2011. Development and validation of an automatic thermal imaging process for assessing plant water status. Agric Water Manag. 98(10):1497–1504.
  • Jones HG. 1992. Stomata. In: Jones HG, editor. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 122–152.
  • Jones HG, Serraj R, Loveys BR, Xiong L, Wheaton A, Price AH. 2009. Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Funct Plant Biol. 36(11):978–989.
  • Jones HG, Stoll M, Santos T, de Sousa C, Chaves MM, Grant OM. 2002. Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. J Exp Bot. 53(378):2249–2260.
  • Jung S, Steffen KL, Lee HJ. 1998. Comparative photoinhibition of a high and a low altitude ecotype of tomato (Lycopersicon hirsutum) to chilling stress under high and low light conditions. Plant Sci. 134(1):69–77.
  • Kerstetter RA, Poethig RS. 1998. The specification of leaf identity during shoot development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 14(1):373–398.
  • Kozlowski TT. 1997. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol. 17(7):1–28.
  • Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 2002. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. Bot Rev. 68(2):270–334.2.0.CO;2]
  • Ky-Dembele C, Bayala J, Savadogo P, Tigabu M, Odén PC, Boussim IJ. 2010. Comparison of growth responses of Khaya senegalensis seedlings and stecklings to four irrigation regimes. Silva Fenn. 44(5):787–798.
  • Lee JK, Kwak MJ, Jeong SG, Woo SY. 2022. Individual and interactive effects of elevated ozone and temperature on plant responses. Horticulturae. 8(3):211.
  • Lee JK, Kwak MJ, Park SH, Kim HD, Lim YJ, Jeong SG, Choi YS, Woo SY. 2021. Ozone response of leaf physiological and stomatal characteristics in Brassica juncea L. at supraoptimal temperatures. Land. 10(4):357.
  • Lee KC, Kweon H, Sung JW, Kim YS, Song YG, Cha S, Koo N. 2022. Physiological response analysis for the diagnosis of drought and waterlogging damage in Prunus yedoensis. Forest Sci Technol. 18(1):14–25.
  • Lei Y, Yin C, Li C. 2006. Differences in some morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii. Physiol Plant. 127(2):182–191.
  • Leuzinger S, Körner C. 2007. Tree species diversity affects canopy leaf temperatures in a mature temperate forest. Agric for Meteorol. 146(1-2):29–37.
  • Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N. 2011. Morphological, anatomical and physiological responses of Campylotropis polyantha (Franch.) Schindl seedlings to progressive water stress. Sci Hortic. 127(3):436–443.
  • Lim H, Kang JW, Lee S, Lee H, Lee WY. 2017. Growth and physiological responses of Quercus acutissima seedling under drought stress. Plant Breed Biotech. 5(4):363–370.
  • Liu BB, Li M, Li QM, Cui QQ, Zhang WD, Ai XZ, Bi HG. 2018. Combined effects of elevated CO2 concentration and drought stress on photosynthetic performance and leaf structure of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings. Photosynt. 56(3):942–952.
  • Liu B, Liang J, Tang G, Wang X, Liu F, Zhao D. 2019. Drought stress affects on growth, water use efficiency, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of Juglans rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 250:230–235.
  • Liu MH, Yi LT, Yu SQ, Yu F, Yin XM. 2015. Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and the growth response of Elaeocarpus glabripetalus to simulated acid rain. Photosynt. 53(1):23–28.
  • Liu J, Zhang F, Zhou J, Chen F, Wang B, Xie X. 2012. Phytochrome B control of total leaf area and stomatal density affects drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 78(3):289–300.
  • Long SP, Humphries S, Falkowski PG. 1994. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 45(1):633–662.
  • Mahlein AK. 2016. Plant disease detection by imaging sensors – parallels and specific demands for precision agriculture and plant phenotyping. Plant Dis. 100(2):241–251.
  • Mangus DL, Sharda A, Zhang N. 2016. Development and evaluation of thermal infrared imaging system for high spatial and temporal resolution crop water stress monitoring of corn within a greenhouse. Comput Electron Agric. 121:149–159.
  • Markwell J, Osterman JC, Mitchell JL. 1995. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth Res. 46(3):467–472.
  • Marquard RD, Tipton JL. 1987. Relationship between extractable chlorophyll and an in situ method to estimate leaf greenness. horts. 22(6):1327.
  • Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD. 2005. The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature. 436(7052):866–870.
  • Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 51(345):659–668.
  • McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, et al. 2008. Mechanism of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178(4):719–739.,.
  • Medrano H, Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Gulías J. 2010. Measuring water use efficiency in grapevines. In: Delrot S, Medrano H, Or E, Bavaresco L, Grando S, editors. Methodologies and results in grapevine research. Germany: Springer; p. 57–70.
  • Mihailović N, Lazarević M, Dželetović Z˘, Vučković M, Đurđević M. 1997. Chlorophyllase activity in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. leaves during drought and its dependence on the nitrogen ion form applied. Plant Sci. 129(2):141–146.
  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl. 17(8):2145–2151.
  • Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K. 2005. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Bot. 53(2):205–214.
  • Möller M, Alchanatis V, Cohen Y, Meron M, Tsipris J, Naor A, Ostrovsky V, Sprintsin M, Cohen S. 2007. Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. J Exp Bot. 58(4):827–838.
  • Moritsuka E, Chhang P, Tagane S, Toyama H, Sokh H, Yahara T, Tachida H. 2017. Genetic variation and population structure of a threatened timber tree Dalbergia cochinchinensis in Cambodia. Tree Genet Genomes. 13(6):1–11.
  • Niinemets Ü. 2010. Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For Ecol Manage. 260(10):1623–1639.
  • Niinemets Ü, Portsmuth A, Tobias M. 2006. Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. New Phytol. 171(1):91–104.
  • Nilsson HE. 1995. Remote sensing and image analysis in plant pathology. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 17(2):154–166.
  • Niu S, Luo Y, Li D, Cao S, Xia J, Li J, Smith MD. 2014. Plant growth and mortality under climatic extremes: an overview. Environ Exp Bot. 98:13–19.
  • O'sullivan OS, Heskel MA, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Weerasinghe LK, Penillard A, Zhu L, Egerton JJG, Bloomfield KJ, Creek D, et al. 2017. Thermal limits of leaf metabolism across biomes. Glob Change Biol. 23(1):209–223.
  • Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. 2003. Does the photosynthetic light‐acclimation need change in leaf anatomy? Plant Cell Environ. 26(4):505–512.
  • Ortiz-Bustos CM, Pérez-Bueno ML, Barón M, Molinero-Ruiz L. 2017. Use of Blue-Green fluorescence and thermal imaging in the early detection of sunflower infection by the root parasitic weed Orobanche cumana Wallr. Front Plant Sci. 8:833.
  • Pagter M, Bragato C, Brix H. 2005. Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. Aquat Bot. 81(4):285–299.
  • Peprah T, Kyereh B, Owusu KA, Adu-Bredu S. 2009. Drought tolerance of Garcinia kola and Garcinia afzelii at the seedlings stage. Gha J For. 25:13–27.
  • Poorter L, Bongers F, Kouamé FN, Hawthorne WD. 2004. Biodiversity of West African forests: An ecological atlas of woody plant species. Wallingford: CABI International.
  • Poorter L, Hayashida-Oliver Y. 2000. Effects of seasonal drought on gap and understory seedlings in a Bolivian moist forest. J Trop Ecol. 16(4):481–498.
  • Prashar A, Jones HG. 2014. Infra-red thermography as a high-throughput tool for field phenotyping. Agronomy. 4(3):397–417.
  • Pšidová E, Ditmarová Ľ, Jamnická G, Kurjak D, Majerová J, Czajkowski T, Bolte A. 2015. Photosynthetic response of beech seedlings of different origin to water deficit. Photosynt. 53(2):187–194.
  • Ramel F, Birtic S, Ginies C, Soubigou-Taconnat L, Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M. 2012. Carotenoid oxidation products are stress signals that mediate gene responses to singlet oxygen in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109(14):5535–5540.
  • Ramirez-Valiente JA, Koehler K, Cavender-Bares J. 2015. Climatic origins predict variation in photoprotective leaf pigments in response to drought and low temperatures in live oaks (Quercus series Virentes). Tree Physiol. 35(5):521–534.
  • Raza SEA, Smith HK, Clarkson GJJ, Taylor G, Thompson AJ, Clarkson J, Rajpoot NM. 2014. Automatic detection of regions in spinach canopies responding to soil moisture deficit using combined visible and thermal imagery. PLoS One. 9(6):e97612.
  • Scott SL, Aarssen LW. 2012. Within-species leaf size–number trade-offs in herbaceous angiosperms. Botany. 90(3):223–235.
  • Sharkey TD. 2005. Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species, and thermotolerance provided by isoprene. Plant Cell Environ. 28(3):269–277.
  • Sheffield J, Wood EF. 2008. Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Clim Dyn. 31(1):79–105.
  • Sheffield J, Wood EF, Roderick ML. 2012. Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature. 491(7424):435–438.
  • Siddique MRB, Hamid A, Islam MS. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Bot Stud. 41:35–39.
  • Snider JL, Choinski JS, Wise RR. 2009. Juvenile Rhus glabra leaves have higher temperatures and lower gas exchange rates than mature leaves in the field when compared during periods of high irradiance. J Plant Physiol. 166(7):686–696.
  • Stoll M, Jones HG. 2007. Thermal imaging as a viable tool for monitoring plant stress. J Int Sci Vigne Vin. 41(2):77–84.
  • Stott P. 2016. How climate change affects extreme weather events. Science. 352(6293):1517–1518.
  • Surendar KK, Devi DD, Ravi I, Jeyakumar P, Velayudham K. 2013. Effect of water stress on leaf temperature, transpiration rate, stomatal diffusive resistance and yield of banana. Plant Gene Trait. 4(1):43–47.
  • Swaine MD. 1996. Rainfall and soil fertility as factors limiting forest species distributions in Ghana. J Ecol. 84(3):419–428.
  • Tenhunen JD, Pearcy RW, Lange OL. 1987. Diurnal variations in leaf conductance and gas exchange in natural environments. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR editors. Stomatal Function. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; p. 323–351.
  • Ter Steege H, Pitman NCA, Phillips OL, Chave J, Sabatier D, Duque A, Molino JF, Prévost MF, Spichiger R, Castellanos H, et al. 2006. Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature. 443(7110):444–447.
  • Teskey R, Wertin T, Bauweraerts I, Ameye M, McGuire MA, Steppe K. 2015. Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant Cell Environ. 38(9):1699–1712.
  • Tilahun S, Park DS, Seo MH, Hwang IG, Kim SH, Choi HR, Jeong CS. 2018. Prediction of lycopene and β-carotene in tomatoes by portable chroma-meter and VIS/NIR spectra. Postharvest Biol Technol. 136:50–56.
  • Trenberth KE, Dai A, van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, Sheffield J. 2014. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Clim Change. 4(1):17–22.
  • Tsukaya H. 2013. Leaf development. Arabidopsis Book. 11:e0163.
  • Wang JR, Hawkins CDB, Letchford T. 1998. Photosynthesis, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of four paper birch (Betula papyrifera) populations grown under different soil moisture and nutrient regimes. For Ecol Manage. 112(3):233–244.
  • Wang R, Huang W, Chen L, Ma L, Guo C, Liu X. 2011. Anatomical and physiological plasticity in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) along large-scale longitudinal gradient in northeast China. PLoS One. 6(11):1–8.
  • Werden LK, Averill C, Crowther TW, Calderón-Morales E, Toro L, Alvarado JP, Gutiérrez LM, Mallory DE, Powers JS. 2022. Below-ground traits mediate tree survival in a tropical dry forest restoration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 378(1867):20210067.
  • Whitman T, Aarssen LW. 2010. The leaf size/number trade-off in herbaceous angiosperms. J Plant Ecol. 3(1):49–58.
  • Woo NS, Badger MR, Pogson BJ. 2008. A rapid, noninvasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods. 4(1):27.
  • Woodall GS, Dodd IC, Stewart GR. 1998. Contrasting leaf development within the genus Syzygium. J Exp Bot. 49(318):79–87.
  • Wright IJ, Dong N, Maire V, Prentice IC, Westoby M, Díaz S, Gallagher RV, Jacobs BF, Kooyman R, Law EA, et al. 2017. Global climatic drivers of leaf size. Science. 357(6354):917–921.,.
  • Xioling L, Ning L, Jin Y, Fuzhou Y, Faju C, Fangqing C. 2011. Morphological and photosynthetic responses of riparian plant Distylium chinense seedlings to simulated autumn and winter flooding in three Gorges Reservoir Region of the Yangtze River, China. Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 31(1):31–39.
  • Xu Z, Zhou G. 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot. 59(12):3317–3325.
  • Yadava UL. 1986. A rapid and nondestructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. horts. 21(6):1449–1450.
  • Yang DM, Li GY, Sun SC. 2008. The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Ann Bot. 102(4):623–629.
  • Yang F, Miao LF. 2010. Adaptive responses to progressive drought stress in two poplar species originating from different altitudes. Silva Fenn. 44(1):23–37.
  • Zandalinas SI, Fritschi FB, Mittler R. 2021. Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends Plant Sci. 26(6):588–599.
  • Zhu Y, Kang H, Xie Q, Wang Z, Yin S, Liu C. 2012. Pattern of leaf vein density and climate relationship of Quercus variabilis populations remains unchanged with environmental changes. Trees. 26(2):597–607.
  • Zhu Y, Luo X, Nawaz G, Yin J, Yang J. 2020. Physiological and biochemical responses of four cassava cultivars to drought stress. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–12.