Researching with impact in the Global South? Impact-evaluation practices and the reproduction of ‘development knowledge’

References

• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first, Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Who's reality counts: Putting the first last, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (1998). ‘Beneath the pavement only soil’: The poverty of post-development. Journal of Development Studies, 34(6), 138–148. doi: 10.1080/00220389808422549
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (2007). The (im)possibility of development studies. Economy and Society, 36(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1080/03085140701264869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M., & Véron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crush, J. (1995). Power of development, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, F. (2001). Geography militant: Cultures of exploration and empire, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (1989). The irrelevance of development studies. Third World Quarterly, 11(1), 116–135. doi: 10.1080/01436598908420142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1996). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G. (1992). Development. The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, London: W. Sachs.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. (2012). De Soto's The mystery of capital: Reflections on the book's public impact. International Development and Planning Review, 34(3), v–xviii.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., Brutscheer, P. B., Kirk, S., Butler, L., & Wooding, S. (2009). Documented briefing: Capturing research impacts – a review of international practice. HEFCE ref: DB-578-HEFCE. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://test.hedd.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2009/rd23_09/
   Google Scholar
• Jazeel, T. (2010, August). Impact: An introduction (Social Text, Periscope). Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://www.socialtextjournal.org/periscope/impact/
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Mearns, R. (1996). The lie of the land: Challenging received wisdom on the African environment, London: International African Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development and the practice of politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. (1992). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Meth, P., & Williams, G. (2010, August). Researching the Global South in an age of impact (Social Text, Periscope). Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://www.socialtextjournal.org/periscope/impact/
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People's knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cook & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation – the new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: Zed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice, London: Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., Kesby, M., & Askins, K. (2011). Geographies of impact: Power, participation and potential. Area, 43(2), 183–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00978.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletsch, C. E. (1981). The three worlds, or the division of social scientific labor, circa 1950–1975. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 23(4), 565–590. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500013566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCUK. (2010). Guidance for completing the pathways to impact. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/kei/impacts/Pages/Guidance.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W. (1992). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities in the 21st century, London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. (2012). Impacted geographers: A response to Pain, Kesby and Askins. Area, 44(1), 117–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. (2011). Development. In J. Agnew & J. Duncan (Eds.), Companion to human geography (pp. 559–574). Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. (2012). The disciplining effects of impact evaluation practices: Negotiating the pressures of impact within an ESRC-DFID project. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(4), 489–495.
   Google Scholar