394
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part 1: Knowledge Mobilisation and Research Impact

A model for knowledge mobilisation and implications for the education of social researchers

, &
Pages 191-206 | Received 19 Oct 2012, Accepted 16 Nov 2012, Published online: 29 Jan 2013

References

  • AACSB. (2008). Final report of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International) Impact of Research Task Force. Retrieved October 5, 2012, from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/researchreports/
  • Boyer, L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice, Chichester: Wiley.
  • Clarke, T., Thorpe, R., & Greatbatch, D. (2007). The future role of the recognition process in the ESRC's Accreditation of Research Provision. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council.
  • Collins, H., Evans, R., & Gorman, M. (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38, 657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.003
  • Farrow, N. (1969). Progress of management research, London: Penguin.
  • Gorman, M. E. (2002). Levels of expertise and trading zones: A framework for multidisciplinary collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 32, 933–938.
  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346–1352. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.28166119
  • Harvey, J., Pettigrew, A., & Ferlie, E. (2002). The determinants of research group performance: Towards Mode 2? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 747–774. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00310
  • HEFCE. (2011). Decisions on assessing research impact. Retrieved September 29, 2012, from http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/
  • Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8, 91–106. doi: 10.1080/09537329608524237
  • Huxham, C. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage, London: Routledge.
  • Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mohrman, S. A., Lawler III, E. E. (2011). Useful research: Advancing theory and practice, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Morris, H. (2011). Business and management research in the UK from 1900 to 2009 and beyond. In C. Cassell & B. Lee (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 30–55). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Nikiforuk, A. (2010). Tar sands: Dirty oil and the future of a continent, Vancouver: Greystone Books.
  • Nind, P. F. (1985). A firm foundation: The story of the FME, London: Foundation of Management Education.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). The double hurdles for management research. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Advancement in organizational behaviour: Essays in honour of Derek S. Pugh (pp. 277–296). London: Dartmouth Press.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). Scholarship with impact. British Journal of Management, 22, 347–354.
  • Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research, London: Sage.
  • Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research, Chichester: Wiley.
  • Reed, M. I. (2009). The theory/practice gap: A problem for business schools? Journal of Management Development, 28, 685–693. doi: 10.1108/02621710910985450
  • Rousseau, D. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rynes, S. L. (2007). Carrying Sumantra Ghoshal's torch: Creating more positive, relevant, and ecologically valid research – foreword. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 745–747. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279165
  • Smith, S., Ward, V., & House, A. (2011). Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's research excellence framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Research Policy, 40, 1369–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.026
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects – amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Stokes, D. E. (1996). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
  • Thomas, H., & Wilson, A. D. (2011). Physics envy’, cognitive legitimacy or practical relevance: Dilemmas in the evolution of management research in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22, 443–456.
  • Thorpe, R., Eden, C., Bessant, J., & Ellwood, P. (2011). Rigour, relevance and reward: Introducing the knowledge translation value-chain. British Journal of Management, 22, 420–431.
  • Thorpe, R., & Ellwood, P. (2011). Positioning current UK management research. In C. Cassell & B. Lee (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Van De Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802–821. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22527385
  • Wensley, R. (2011). Seeking relevance in management research. In C. Cassell & B. Lee (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 258–274). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wilson, J. F. (1992). The Manchester experiment: A history of Manchester Business School, 1965–1990, Manchester: Chapman.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.