Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists

References

• Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., O'Brien, K. L. (2009). Adaptation now. In W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, & K. L. O'Brien (Eds.), Adapting to climate change thresholds, values, governance (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H., Larson, O. F., & Gillespie, G. W. (1990). The sociology of agriculture, Westport: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2005). Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 95–111. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D., Fish, R., Oliver, D. M., Heathwaite, L., Hodgson, C., & Winter, M. (2008). Management of livestock and their manure to reduce the risk of microbial transfers to water – The case for an interdisciplinary approach. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(5), 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., Davidson, G., Grant, W. P., Greaves, J., & Tatchell, G. M. (2008). Microbial biopesticides for integrated crop management: An assessment of environmental and regulatory sustainability. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(5), 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Lowe, P. (1992). Cleaning up agriculture: Environment, technology and social science. Sociologia Ruralis, 32(1), 11–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1992.tb00916.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defra SAC (2006). Increasing the capacity and uptake of social research in Defra, London: Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Jones, G., Mila i Canals, L., Hounsome, N., Truninger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., Cross, P., York, L., Hospida, A., Plassmann, K., Harris, I., Edwards, R., Day, G., Tomos, D., Cowell, S., & Jones, D. (2008). Testing the assertion that “local food is best”: The challenges of an evidence based approach. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(5), 265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, J., & Grant, W. (2010). Crossing the interdisciplinary divide: Political science and biological science. Political Studies, 58, 320–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A. (2000). Intervention research and the production of knowledge. In M. Cerf, D. Gibbon, B. Hubert, R. Ison, J. Jiggins, M. Paine, J. Proost, & N. Roling (Eds.), Cow up a tree: Knowing and learning for change in agriculture cases studies from industrialised countries (pp. 55–68). Paris: INRA.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, R. J., Fiorini, S., Yearley, S., MacLeod, J. E., Turner, A., Armstrong, H., White, P. C. L., van der Wal, R. (2009). Can managers inform models? Integrating local knowledge into models of red deer habitat use. Journal of Applied Ecology, 11(2), 344–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01626.x
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012a). The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environment Modelling and Software, 36, 4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, T., Page, T., Smith, L., & Voinov, A. (2012b). Thematic issue on expert opinion in environmental modelling and management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 36, 1–148. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. J., Ward, N., & Bradley, S. (2011). Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(1), 15–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000225716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P. (1992). Industrial agriculture and environmental regulation: A new agenda for rural sociology. Sociologia Ruralis, 32(1), 4–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1992.tb00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., & Phillipson, J. (2006). Reflexive interdisciplinary research: The making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 165–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Green, L. E., Hunter, S., Jeger, M. J., Poppy, G. M., & Waage, J. (2011). Special issue: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the management of infectious animal and plant diseases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366(1573), 1931–2054.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., & Lee, R. (2008). Socio-technical innovation for sustainable food chains: Roles for social science. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(5), 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., Whitman, G., & Phillipson, J. (2009). Ecology and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 297–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, M., Carss, D., & Bell, S. (2006). Working to make interdisciplinarity work: Investing in communication and interdisciplinary relationships. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 185–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, L. R. (2012). Rural Economy and Land Use Programme (Relu) societal and economic impact evaluation (REFERENCE PS110020). Technology Development Group, Edengrove House, Fife.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, L. R., & Lyall, C. (2007). Review of the RELU Programme’s seed-corn funding mechanisms (CONTRACT REF:UNT/357). Technology Development Group and Information Browser Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, E., & Bracken, L. (2009). Interdisciplinarity research: Framing and reframing. Area, 4(4), 385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00903.x
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, J., & Lowe, P. (2006). Special issue guest editorial: The scoping of an interdisciplinary research agenda. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 163–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00044.x
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, J., & Lowe, P. (2008). Towards sustainable food chains: Harnessing the social and natural sciences. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(5), 224–225. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, J., Lowe, P., & Bullock, J. M. (2009). Navigation the social sciences: Interdisciplinarity and ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(2), 261–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01625.x
   Google Scholar
• Polyani, K. (2001). The great transformation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking 1820–1900, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, A., Donaldson, A., Phillipson, J., & Lowe, P. (2012). Field expertise in rural land management. Environment and Planning A, 44(7), 1696–1711. doi: 10.1068/a44352
   Google Scholar
• Puu, T. (1993). Nonlinear economic dynamics, New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? Stakeholder analysis as a prerequisite for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relu Data Support Service (2011). Innovations in interdisciplinary methods – The Relu experience, Colchester: UK Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., & Williams, R. (2002). Social shaping of technology: Frameworks, findings and implications for policy. In K. Sorensen & R. Williams (Eds.), Shaping technology, guiding policy: Concepts, spaces and tools (pp. 37–120). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. doi: 10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, R., Barker, G., French, S., Hart, A., Maule, J., & Cassidy, A. (2006). Managing food chain risks: Integrating technical and stakeholder perspectives on uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 313–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2007). Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3), 351–373.
   Google Scholar
• Tsouvalis, J., & Waterton, C. (2012). Building ‘participation’ upon critique: The Loweswater Care Project, Cumbria, UK. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Commission on the Social Sciences (2003). Great expectations: The social sciences in Britain, London: Commission on the Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. (2008). Wild mammals and the human food chain. Mammal Review, 38(2–3), 117–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2008.00121.x
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., Grant, W. P., Green, L. E., Hunter, S., Jeger, M. J., Lowe, P., Medley, G. F., Mills, P., Phillipson, J., Poppy, G. M., & Waage, J. (2011). Infectious diseases of animals and plants: An interdisciplinary approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366(1573), 1933–1942. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0415
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25(8), 865–899. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2
   Google Scholar