Social sciences and social movements: the theoretical context

References

• Abrams, D., & Grant, P. R. (2012). Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 674–689. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 409–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boushel, C., & Meuleman, B. (2013). Hash tags, ruling relations and the everyday: Institutional ethnography insights on social movements. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. M. (2004). The strange career of strain and breakdown theories. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 47–66). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callan, B. (2013). Something's wrong here: Transnational dissent and the unimagined community. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 106–120.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, S., & Jones, C. (2013). A matter of law and order: Reporting the Salford riots in local news webpages. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52, 663–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2011). Contextualising the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 275–288. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.625626
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & McCarthy, D. J. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116–152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67, 11–28. doi: 10.2307/1958525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, R. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1982). Expecations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Mohr, J. (2004). The cultural turn in American sociology. In R. Friedland & J. Mohr (Eds.), Matters of culture: Cultural sociology in practice (pp. 1–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with unjust authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 555–595. doi: 10.1086/230049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2004). Social protest and policy change: Ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). The social movements reader: Cases and concepts. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensby, A. (2013). Networks, counter-networks and political socialisation – paths and barriers to high-cost/risk activism in the 2010/11 student protests against fees and cuts. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, E. (1951). The true believer. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, J. (2013). The moral economy of the UK student protest movement 2010-2011. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2007). Cultural approaches in the sociology of social movements. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 59–109). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C. (1985). The politics of insurgency: The farm workers movement in the 1960s. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review, 42, 249–268. doi: 10.2307/2094604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killian, L. M. (1964). Social movements. In R. E. L. Faris (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 426–455). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57–85. doi: 10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1984a). Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600. doi: 10.2307/2095417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1984b). Mobilization and participation in trade union action: An expectancy-value approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 107–120. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 77–103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & De Weerd, M. (2000). Group identification and political protest. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 68–92). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Roggeband, C. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of social movements across disciplines. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Staggenborg, S. (Eds.). (2002). Methods of social movement research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2004). Political context and opportunity. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 67–90). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. (1968). The crowd: A study of the popular mind (Original work published 1895). Dunwoody, GA: Norman S. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Likki, T. (2013). Unity within diversity: A social psychological analysis of the internal diversity of the Indignados movement. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 62, 1144–1158. doi: 10.2307/1953909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, A. (2013). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. T., & Wood, J. L. (1975). Strands of theory and research in collective behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 363–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.002051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 23–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (2002). Beyond structural analysis: Toward a more dynamic understanding of social movements. In M. Diani, & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 281–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2007). Comparative perspectives on contentious politics. In M. Lichbach & A. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics. Rationality, culture and structure (pp. 260–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241. doi: 10.1086/226464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1988). Getting involved: Identity and mobilization in social movements. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movements – from structure to action: Comparing social movements across cultures (pp. 329–348). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Lupo, L. (2007). Assessing the politics of protest: Political science and the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 111–156). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oberschall, A. R. (1973). Social conflicts and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52, 817–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passy, F. (2001). Socialization, connection, and the structure/agency gap: A specification of the impact of networks on participation in social movements. Mobilization: An International Journal, 6, 173–192.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, E., & Newcombe, G. (2003). Income rights, mothers’ rights, or workers’ rights? Collective action frames, organizational ideologies, and the American welfare rights movement. Social Problems, 50, 294–318. doi: 10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. (2011). Mass action and mundane reality: An argument for putting crowd analysis at the centre of the social sciences. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 433–449. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.619347
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2011). Mad mobs and Englishmen? Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. Constable Robinson. Kindle Edition. Retrieved from http://www.madmobsandenglishmen.com/
   Google Scholar
• Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (2007). Introduction. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhek, Z., & Shalev, M. (2013). The political economy of Israel's “social justice” protests: A class and generational analysis. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, T., & Assies, W. (2007). Anthropology and the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 205–266). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Oxford: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant. Mobilization: An International Journal, 1, 197–192.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Cress, D. M., Downey, L., & Jones, A. W. (1998). Disrupting the ‘quotidian’: Reconceptualizing the relationship between breakdown and the emergence of collective action. Mobilization: An International Journal, 3, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilzation, and movement participation. Annual Sociological Review, 51, 464–481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (2004). Mapping the terrain. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 3–16). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S., Owens, T. J., & White, R. W. (2000). Social psychology and social movements: Cloudy past and bright future. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 1–17). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 59–99. doi: 10.1080/10463280340000117
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1983). Struggling to reform: Social movements and policy change during cycles of protest. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the 18th Century. Past & Present, 50, 76–136. doi: 10.1093/past/50.1.76
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Toupin, S. (2013). An open-air self-managed social center called occupy. Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest, 1, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. (1981). The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travaglino, G. A., & Nulman, E. (Eds.). (2012). Theory, action and impact of social protest: An interdisciplinary conference. Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest, 0. New York: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1969). The public perception of protest. American Sociological Review, 34, 815–831. doi: 10.2307/2095975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zald, M. N. (1996). Culture, ideology and strategic framing. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 261–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2007). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 157–204). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., & Spears, R. (2011). The crowd as a psychological cue to in-group support for collective action against collective disadvantage. Contemporary Social Sciences, 6, 325–341. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.619876
   Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar