Contextualising the self in contemporary social science

References

• Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (2013). Collective reflexivity: A relational case for it. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 145–161). New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Aresta, M., Pedro, L., Santos, C., & Moreira, A. (2015). The self and identity in online contexts. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Complexity, 3(2), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317(5837), 472–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bednar, J., Bramson, A., Jones-Rooy, A., & Page, S. (2010). Emergent cultural signatures and persistent diversity: A model of conformity and consistency. Rationality and Society, 22(4), 407–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2007). Self. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_yr2013_chunk_g978140512433125_ss1–68
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self-revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. S. (2013). Touching a nerve: The self as brain. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P., De Villiers, T., & Roodt, V. (2002). The formation of the self: Nietzsche and complexity. South African Journal of Philosophy, 21(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioff-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J.,…Helbing, D. (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas-García, C. A. (2015). ‘I have never cared for particular disciplines’ – Constructing the self in interdisciplinary research though discourse and narrative. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, F. (2012). Specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart: Psychotherapy as a moral endeavour. Group Analysis, 45(4), 405–429.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, T., & Cilliers, P. (2004). Narrating the self: Freud, Dennett and complexity theory. South African Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2014). Transcending modernity: The quest for a relational society. Bologna: University of Bologna.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1970). What is sociology? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A. (2001). Concepts of the self. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A. (2013). Reinvention. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (2013). Relational sociology as fighting words. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 209–211). New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2001). Work knowing on the fly: Post-corporate enterprise cultures and co-emergent epistemology. Studies in Continuing Education, 23(1), 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Fidolini, V. (2015). Self-construction and multiple-modernities: A sociological approach to the condition of the individual in the south. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., & Hofkirchner, W. (2005). The dialectic of bottom-up and top-down emergence in social systems. tripleC – Cognition, Communication, Co-operation: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 3(2), 28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gachter, S., & Thoni, C. (2011). Micromotives, microstructure, and macrobehavior: The case of voluntary cooperation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35, 26–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaita, R. (2000). A common humanity: Thinking about love truth and justice. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Grund, T., Waloszek, C., & Helbing, D. (2013). How natural selection can create both self- and other-regarding preferences, and networked minds. Scientific Reports, 3, 1480. doi:10.1038/srep01480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, S. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2001). Chaos and complexity: Their bearing on social policy research. Social Issues, 1(2). Retrieved July 3, 2014, from http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/harvey.htm
   Google Scholar
• Helbing, D. (2013). Economics 2.0: The natural step towards a self-regulating, participatory market society. Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review, 10(1), 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, E. (2003). Traumatic experience in the unconscious life of groups. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Glass, L. (1995). Understanding nonlinear dynamics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katerelos, I. (2013). Chaos and order in social systems. The HESIOD model: Social dynamics simulations. Athens: Papazisis Publications [in Greek].
   Google Scholar
• Katerelos, I., & Koulouris, A. (2004). Is prediction possible? Chaotic behavior of multiple equilibria regulation model in cellular automata topology. Complexity, 10(1), 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katerelos, I., & Tsekeris, C. (2012). Reconsidering social dynamics: Fundamentality and social simulations. tripleC – Cognition, Communication, Co-operation: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(1), 122–125.
   Google Scholar
• Katerelos, I., Tsekeris, T., & Tsekeris, C. (2013). Reflections on agent-based modeling: Simulating web networks. In A. Belya Kora (Ed.), Advances in computational modeling research: Theory, developments and applications (pp. 117–126). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, K. (2010). The relational self, the social bond and the dynamics of personal relationships: A sociological analysis (Sociology Research Reports No. 263). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, K., & Meskus, M. (2015). The dilemma of ‘the capable agent’. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. H. (1960). Self-attitudes by age, sex, and professional training. The Sociological Quarterly, 1(1), 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisiecka, K. (2012). Group as a unit of analysis. In A. Nowak, K. Winkowska-Nowak, & D. S. Bree (Eds.), Complex human dynamics: From minds to societies (pp. 209–225). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1986). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1973). L'esprit, le soi et la société. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2010). I and we identities: An Eliasian perspective on lesbian and gay identities. Sociological Research Online, 15(4). Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/10.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. E. (1986). Introspection and self-knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly, 23(2), 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R., Strawinska, U., & Bree, D. S. (2013). Dynamical social psychology: An introduction. In A. Nowak, K. Winkowska-Nowak, & D. S. Bree (Eds.), Complex human dynamics: From minds to societies (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (2011). Producing sociology in today's unequal world. Global Dialogue, 2(2). Retrieved June 28, 2014, from http://www.isa-sociology.org/global-dialogue/2011/11/producing-sociology-in-today%E2%80%99s-unequal-world/
   Google Scholar
• Ormay, T. (2012). The social nature of persons: One person is no person. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C., & Dépelteau, F. (2013). Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues. New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, M. L., & Fernando, K. C. (2015). Agency and prosociality: The self in family coexistence. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. (2007). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Jenks, C. (2006). Qualitative complexity: Ecology, cognitive processes and the re-emergence of structures in post-humanist social theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. S. (1997). Nonlinear dynamics and the micro-macro bridge. In R. Smith, S. Horsfall, & M. E. Lee (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and sociology (pp. 55–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E. (2001). The mirror and the hammer: Challenges to therapeutic orthodoxy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E. (2007). Practising existential psychotherapy: The relational world. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. (2003). Complex and group processes: A radically social understanding of the individual. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R., & Griffin, D. (2008). Complexity and the experience of values, conflict and compromise in organizations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stepnisky, J. N. (2006). Narrative and selfhood in the antidepressant era (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Strawinska, U. (2013). A dynamical systems approach to conceptualizing and investigating the self. In A. Nowak, K. Winkowska-Nowak, & D. S. Bree (Eds.), Complex human dynamics: From minds to societies (pp. 35–47). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature and daily life. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Sulik, G. (2009). Managing biomedical uncertainty: The technoscientific illness identity. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(7), 1059–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C. (2009). Advances in understanding human complex systems. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4), 4040–4045.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C. (2010). Relationalism in sociology: Theoretical and methodological elaborations. Facta Universitatis. Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 9(1), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C. (2013a). Toward a chaos-friendly reflexivity: Dialogical considerations and perspectives. Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar, 16(1), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C. (2013b). Norbert elias on relations: Insights and perspectives. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 87–104). New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C., & Alexias, G. (2012). Science, genetic knowledge and the human body. Problemos, 81(1), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C., & Katerelos, I. (2012). Web 2.0, complex networks and social dynamics. Contemporary Social Science, 7(3), 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• Tziovas, D. (2003). The other self: Selfhood and society in modern Greek fiction. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Mobile sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2000). Landscapes of self-reflection: Mapping the peaks and valleys of personal assessment. In A. Tesser, R. Felson, & J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 35–65). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. (2005). The archers: A tale of folk (final episode?). European Journal of Social Theory, 8(2), 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Vass, J. (2015). Selfhood and its pragmatic coherence in the context of social entropy: Towards a new framework of the social self. Contemporary Social Science, 10(1), 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. (2007). The lucifer effect: How good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar