Populism, protest and democracy in the twenty-first century

References

• Abers, R., & Tatagiba, L. (2015). Institutional activism: Mobilizing for women’s health from inside the Brazilian bureaucracy. In F. Rossi & M. von Bülow (Eds.), Social movement dynamics: New perspectives on theory and research from Latin America (pp. 73–101). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55, 405–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allin, D. (2016). Donald Trump’s America. Survival, 58, 221–228. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1161919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, J. (2015). China’s foreign relations and the survival of autocracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2005). Islamism and social movement theory. Third World Quarterly, 26, 891–908. doi: 10.1080/01436590500089240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrend, J., & Whitehead, L. (2016). The struggle for subnational democracy. Journal of Democracy, 27, 155–169. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berbuir, N., Lewandowsky, M., & Siri, J. (2015). The AfD and its sympathisers: Finally a right-wing populist movement in Germany? German Politics, 24, 154–178. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2014.982546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49, 401–429. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, C. (2012). The new xenologies of Europe: Civil tensions and mythic pasts. Journal of Civil Society, 8, 307–326. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2012.732456
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16, 399–423. doi: 10.1080/13510340902777800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordignon, F., & Ceccarini, L. (2013). Five stars and a cricket: Beppe Grillo shakes Italian politics. South European Society and Politics, 18, 427–449. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2013.775720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, A. (2011). Occupy the state: The Orbán regime in Hungary. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 19, 649–663.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V., & Wolchik, S. (2011). Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9, 241–252. doi: 10.1080/1356931042000263500
   Google Scholar
• Chandhoke, N. (2001). The ‘civil’ and the ‘political’ in civil society. Democratization, 8, 1–24. doi: 10.1080/714000194
   Google Scholar
• De, S. (2015). Context, image and the case of the Shahbag movement. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26, 141–155. doi: 10.1353/jod.2015.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Parra, I., Roca, B., & Romano, S. (2015). Political activists’ frames in times of post-politics: Evidence from Kirchnerism in Argentina and Podemos in Spain. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 386–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., & Hayes, G. (2014). Having your day in court: Judicial opportunity and tactical choice in anti-GMO campaigns in France and the United Kingdom. Contemporary Political Science, 47, 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J., & Stott, C. (2011). Contextualising the crowd in contemporary social science. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 275–288. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.625626
   Google Scholar
• El Hamel, C. (2002). Muslim diaspora in Western Europe: The Islamic headscarf (Hijab), the media and Muslim’s integration in France. Citizenship Studies, 6, 293–308. doi: 10.1080/1362102022000011621
   Google Scholar
• Ellinas, A. (2015). Neo-nazism in an established democracy: The persistence of Golden Dawn in Greece. South European Society and Politics, 20, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2014.981379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, R. (1986). Social movements and the state: The environmental movement, countermovement, and government agencies. Sociological Perspectives, 29, 202–240. doi: 10.2307/1388959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. (2000). Civil society and the “art of association”. Journal of Democracy, 11, 64–70. doi: 10.1353/jod.2000.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J., & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In R. Aminzade, J. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. Perry, W. Sewell, Jr., S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 179–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, K., & Morlino, L. (2004). Problematizing the links between authoritarian legacies and ‘good’ democracy’. In K. Hite & P. Cesarini (Eds.), Authoritarian legacies and democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 25–83). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Högström, J. (2014). Democracies in crisis. Contemporary Politics, 20, 402–420. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.969122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, V. (2015). The protests and beyond. Journal of Democracy, 26, 111–121. doi: 10.1353/jod.2015.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late 20th century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29, 75–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, H. (2011). States and social movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2015). Political religion and the rise of transnational right and left-wing social movements since 9/11. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19, 184–208. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.572619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, A. (2016). Podemos: The ambiguous promises of left-wing populism in contemporary Spain. Journal of Political Ideologies, 21, 99–120. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1150136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., & Mudde, C. (2003). Rethinking civil society. Democratization, 10, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13510340312331293907
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. (2015). Hungary’s u-turn: Retreating from democracy. Journal of Democracy, 26, 34–48. doi: 10.1353/jod.2015.0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerspetz, M. (2001). From ‘parallel polis’ to ‘the time of tribes’: Post-socialism, social self-organization and post-modernity. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 17, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/714003577
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, G., & Lindekilde, L. (2009). Muslim claims-making in context: Comparing the Danish and Swedish Muhammad cartoons controversies. Ethnicities, 9, 361–382. doi: 10.1177/1468796809337426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20, 107–136. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. (1974). Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participant: The agent provocateur and the informant. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 402–442. doi: 10.1086/225807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, P. (2007). Democracy and religion: Theoretical and empirical observations on the relationship between Christianity, Islam and liberal democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 887–909. doi: 10.1080/13691830701432731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2004a). What is ‘good’ democracy? Democratization, 11, 10–32. doi: 10.1080/13510340412331304589
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2004b). ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ democracies: How to conduct research into the quality of democracy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20, 5–27. doi: 10.1080/13523270410001687082
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., & Polese, A. (Ed.). (2015). Informal economies in post-socialist spaces: Practices, institutions and networks. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48, 147–174. doi: 10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, G. (2016). What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization, 23, 1–26. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2014.918104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, G., & Leff, C. (1997). Modes of transition and democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 29, 343–362. doi: 10.2307/422125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2012). Food riots as representations of insecurity: Examining the relationship between contentious politics and human security. Conflict, Security and Development, 12, 31–49. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2012.667660
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2015a). The primacy of political security: Contentious politics and insecurity in the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 22, 1209–1229. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2014.949247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2015b). Social control and the New Zealand environmental movement. Journal of Sociology, 51, 785–798. doi: 10.1177/1440783312473188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. (2016). Unbuilding from the inside: Leadership and democratization in South Africa and South Korea. Government and Opposition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/gov.2015.41.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T., & Podder, S. (2012). Introduction. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 13, 429–437. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2012.729144
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator, 50, 22–41. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orofino, E. (2015). Intellectual radicals challenging the state: The case of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the West. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 401–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papasthathis, K. (2015). Religious discourse and radical right politics in contemporary Greece, 2010–2014. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 16, 218–247. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2015.1077705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinfari, M. (2013). The EU, Egypt and Morsi’s rise and fall: ‘Strategic patience’ and its discontents. Mediterranean Politics, 18, 460–466. doi: 10.1080/13629395.2013.840441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, M. (2010). Populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 21, 81–92. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruibal, A. (2015). Social movements and constitutional politics in Latin America: Reconfiguring alliances, framings and legal opportunities in the judicialisation of abortion rights case in Brazil. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, Jr., W. (2001). Space in contentious politics. In R. Aminzade, J. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. Perry, W. Sewell, Jr., S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 51–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R., Sobolev, A., & Soboleva, I. (2013). A well-organized party: Symbolic politics and the effect of pro-Putin rallies. Problems of Post-Communism, 60, 24–39. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springborg, R. (2016). Caudillismo along the Nile. The International Spectator, 51, 74–85. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2016.1120975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 95–110. doi: 10.1080/13569310701822289
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2013). The language of contention: Revolutions in words, 1688–2012. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Travaglino, G. (2014). Social sciences and social movements: The theoretical context. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.851406
   Google Scholar
• Walton, J., & Seddon, D. (1994). Free markets and food riots: The politics of global adjustment. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Way, L. (2015). The limits of autocracy promotion: The case of Russia in the “Near Abroad”. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 691–706. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weßels, B. (2015). Political culture, political satisfaction and the rollback of democracy. Global Policy, 6, 93–105. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, K. (1998). Revisiting Toqueville’s America: Society, politics, and association in the nineteenth century. American Behavioural Scientist, 42, 21–32. doi: 10.1177/0002764298042001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, K. (2015). The origins of labour autonomy in authoritarian Tunisia. Contemporary Social Science, 10(4), 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. (2012). Direct action, deliberation, and diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, J. (2007). The resurgence of jihad and the specter of religious populism. SAIS Review, 27, 127–144. doi: 10.1353/sais.2007.0022
   Google Scholar