Political candidates in infotainment programmes and their emotional effects on Twitter: an analysis of the 2015 Spanish general elections pre-campaign season

References

• Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC question time: Television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 440–462. doi: 10.1177/1940161211415519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. S. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens to vote consistently. The Journal of Politics, 68, 946–959. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. doi: 10.1177/0002716212451428
   Google Scholar
• Berrocal Gonzalo, S., Redondo García, M., Martín Jiménez, V., & Campos Domínguez, E. (2014). Presence of infotainment in Spain’s mainstream DTT channels. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 85–103. doi: 10.4185/RLCS-2014-1002en
   Google Scholar
• Brants, K. & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15(2), 149–164. doi: 10.1080/10584609809342363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Marquez, F., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2014). Meta-level sentiment models for big social data analysis. Knowledge-based Systems, 69(1), 86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2011). Vida privada en la esfera pública: La intimidad de los actores políticos españoles en televisión. In A. Casero-Ripollés & J. Marzal (Eds.), Periodismo en televisión. Nuevos horizontes, nuevas tendencias (pp. 170–196). Sevilla: Comunicación Social.
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of Podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1177/1940161216645340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIS. (2015). Barómetro de Diciembre de 2015. Madrid. Retrieved from http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3121mar_A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., & Splendore, S. (2016). From contents to comments: Social TV and perceived pluralism in political talk shows. New Media & Society, Advance online publication 12 September 2016. doi: 10.1177/1461444816668187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid Media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J., & Neuberger, C. (2013). An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 795–825. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Caprini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media age. In W. L. Bennet & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160–181). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferré, C. (Ed.). (2013). Infoentretenimiento. El Formato Imparabla de la Era del Espectáculo. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793–815. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., & Vargo, C. J. (2015). The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, S. (2008). Popular news in the 21st century. Time for a new critical approach? Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 9(3), 266–284. doi: 10.1177/1464884907089008
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C. (2003). Comunicación política: entre la privatización y la espectacularización. Diálogo Político, 1, 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An Introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• López García, G., & Valera Ordaz, L. (Eds.). (2017). Pantallas electorales: El discurso de partido, medios y ciudadanos en la campaña de 2015. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
   Google Scholar
• López-Rico, C., & Peris Blanes, À. (2017). Agenda e imagen de los candidatos en las elecciones generales de 2015 en España en programas televisivos de infoentretenimiento. El profesional de la información, 26(4), 611–620. doi: 10.3145/epi.2017.jul.05
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, P. & Mervi, P. (2007). The emotional public sphere: Social currents of feeling in popular culture. In R. Butsch (Ed.), Media and public spheres (pp. 162–174). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maarek, P. J. (2014). Communication et marketing de l’homme politique (4th ed.). Paris: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama, M., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., Raine, R., & Semaan, B. (2017). ‘Social watching’ a civic broadcast: Understanding the effects of positive feedback and other users’ opinions. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ‘17), 794–807. doi: 10.1145/2998181.2998340
   Google Scholar
• Medhat, W., Hassan, A., & Korashy, H. (2014). Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5(4), 1093–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Motos, P. (2015a, November 3). El Hormiguero 3.0 / Pablo Iglesias [Television Broadcast]. El Hormiguero 3.0. Madrid, Spain: Antena 3.
   Google Scholar
• Motos, P. (2015b, November 24). El Hormiguero 3.0 / Albert Rivera [Television Broadcast]. El Hormiguero 3.0. Madrid, Spain: Antena 3.
   Google Scholar
• Motos, P. (2015c, December 8). El Hormiguero 3.0 / Pedro Sánchez [Television Broadcast]. El Hormiguero 3.0. Madrid, Spain: Antena 3.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, B. (2015a, November 25). En la tuya o en la mía – Pedro Sánchez, secretario general del PSOE [Television Broadcast]. En la tuya o en la mía. Madrid, Spain: TVE1.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, B. (2015b, December 2). En la tuya o en la mía – Mariano Rajoy [Television Broadcast]. En la tuya o en la mía. Madrid, Spain: TVE1.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass Media election: How Americans choose their president. New York, NY: Praeger Special Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Peris Blanes, À., & López-Rico, C. M. (2017). Los programas de entretenimiento: espectáculo y emoción en la comunicación política española. In G. López García & L. Valera Ordaz (Eds.), Pantallas electorales: El discurso de partidos, medios y ciudadanos en la campaña de 2015 (pp. 129–154). Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, Ó, Oliva, M., & Pujadas, E. (2014). La construcción televisiva de la deliberación política. Análisis comparativo de programas informativos y de infotainment. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 8(2), 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., & Alani, H. (2012). Semantic sentiment analysis of Twitter. In 11th international conference on the semantic web. Boston, MA, November 11–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_32
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Hanna, A., Bucy, E. P., Lassen, D. S., Van Thomme, J., Bialik, K., … Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2016). Dual screening during presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1816–1843. doi: 10.1177/0002764216676245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). ‘Happy warriors’: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 345–368. doi: 10.2307/2111127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., & Cai, D. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2544–2558. doi: 10.1002/asi.21416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thussu, D. K. (2007). News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social Media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1390–1410. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilares, D., & Alonso, M. A. (2016). A review on political analysis and social media. Procesamiento Del Lenguaje Natural, 56, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vilares, D., Thelwall, M., & Alonso, M. A. (2015). The megaphone of the people? Spanish SentiStrength for real-time analysis of political tweets. Journal of Information Science, 41(6), 799–813. doi: 10.1177/0165551515598926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohn, Y., & Na, E.-K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16(3), doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i3.3368
   Google Scholar