Introduction: identity, jeopardy and moral dilemmas in conducting research in ‘risky’ environments

References

• Abdelhalim, J. (2018). Accommodating fieldwork to irreconcilable equations of citizenship, authoritarianism, poverty and fear in Egypt. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Altorki, S. & El-Solh, C.F. (Eds.). (1988). Arab women in the field: Studying your own society. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augustin, A. A. (2018). Rumours, fears and solidarity in fieldwork in times of political turmoil on the verge of War in southern Yemen. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1998). What prospects of morality in times of uncertainty? Theory, Culture and Society, 15(1), 11–22. doi: 10.1177/026327698015001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk societies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bolak, H. C. (1996). Studying one’s own in the Middle East: Negotiating gender and self-other dynamics in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 19, 107–130. doi: 10.1007/BF02393250
   Google Scholar
• De Clerck, G. A. M., & Lutalo-Kiingi, S. (2018). Ethical and methodological responses to risks in fieldwork with deaf Ugandans. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza Santos, A. A. (2018). Risky closeness and distance in two fieldwork sites in Brazil. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Smith, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 853–871. doi:10.1177/1049732307309007 doi: 10.1177/1049732306287526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133–144. doi: 10.1177/1049732307309007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. (1998). ‘Risks’, hazards and life choices: Reflections on health at work. Sociology, 32(4), 665–687. doi: 10.1177/0038038598032004003
   Google Scholar
• Fuse, K., Land, M., & Lambiase, J. (2010). Expanding the philosophical base for ethical public relations practice: Cross cultural case application of non-western ethical philosophies. Western Journal of Communication, 74(4), 436–455. doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.492823
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1968). Thinking as a moral act: Ethical dimensions of anthropological fieldwork in the new states. The Antioch Review, 28(2), 139–158. doi: 10.2307/4610913
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goduka, I. (1990). Ethics and politics of field research in South Africa. Social Problems, 37(3), 329–340. doi: 10.2307/800746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. (2007). If the shoe fits: Authenticity, authority and agency feminist diasporic research. Women's Studies International Forum, 30(1), 70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2006.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, T. (2001). The impermeable identity wall: The study of violent conflicts by ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’. In M. Smyth, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Researching violently divided societies: Ethical and methodological issues (pp. 77–91). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, N. (Ed.). (2011). Autobiographical international relations: I, IR. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, H., & Gaffikin, M. (2006). Getting in, getting on and getting out: Reflections on a qualitative research project. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(1), 115–145. doi:10.1108/09513570610651920
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, S. (1985). Beyond ‘subjectivity’: The use of the self in social science. Qualitative Sociology, 8(4), 309–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00988842
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, A. (2018). Environmentalist protection: Feminist methodology and participant risk for research with Chinese NGOs. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. New London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence? Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147–173. doi: 10.1177/1362480699003002002
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. (2005). Transforming the Robocops: Changing police in South Africa. Pietermaritzberg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. (2012). Ducking and diving: Ethical and moral dilemmas in doing criminological research. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 25(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., Piekkari, R., Ritvala, T., Mihailova, I., & Salma, A. (2014). Breaking the silence about exiting fieldwork: A relational approach and its implications for theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 39, 138–161. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, A. (2018). Where the dust settles: Fieldwork, subjectivity and materiality in Cairo. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nast, H. J. (1994). Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives∗. The Professional Geographer, 46, 54–66. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieke, F. (2000). Serendipity: Reflections on fieldwork in China. In P. Dresch, W. James, & D. Parkin (Eds.), Anthropologists in a wider world, methodology and history in anthropology (pp. 29–50). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C., & Fonseca, L. (2010). Overstepping the mark: Ethics procedures, risky research and education researchers. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 33(3), 287–300. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511710
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, J. E. (1993). Planning ethically responsible research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sin, C. (2008). Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice. Sociology, 39(2), 277–294. doi: 10.1177/0038038505050539
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (1990). Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization, 49(2), 114–126. doi: 10.17730/humo.49.2.h033174683462676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. (2011). The forum: Emotion and the feminist IR researcher. International Studies Review, 13, 687–708. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2468.2011.01046.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillmann-Healy, L. M. (2015). Friendship as method. In L. M. Tillmann-Healy (Ed.), In solidarity: Friendship, family, and activism beyond Gay and straight (pp. 287–319/ pp. 1–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi, A. (2018). Field, ethics, and self: Negotiating methodology in a Hindu right wing camp. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Hoonaard, W. (2003). Is anonymity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of Academic Ethics, 1, 141–151. doi: 10.1023/B:JAET.0000006919.58804.4c
   Google Scholar
• Viqar, S. (2018). Risk, violence and positionality: Fieldwork in Karachi’s inner city quarters. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteman, G. (2010). Management studies that break your heart. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 328–337. doi: 10.1177/1056492610370282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. A. (2018). ‘Don’t say ‘research’’: Reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum. Contemporary Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. J. (2006). The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 373–386. doi: 10.1007/s11133-006-9027-8
   Google Scholar