Field, ethics and self: negotiating methodology in a Hindu right wing camp

References

• Anderson, W. K., & Damle, S. D. (1987). The brotherhood in saffron: The Rashra Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu revivalism. New Delhi: Vistaar.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Postlewait, H., & Thompson, A. (2004). Emergency sex and other desperate measures: A true story from hell on earth. New York, NY: Miramax.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, K., & Delamount, S. (1996). Introduction. In K. Carter & S. Delamount (Eds.), Qualitative research: The emotional dimension (pp. i–xv). Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Celine, L.-F. (2005). Could I be the last coward on earth. In S. Faulks & J. Hensgen (Eds.), War stories (pp. 6–16). London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, M., & hooks, b. (1990). A conversation about race and class. In M. Hirsch & E. F. Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism (pp. 60–81). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Fronispiece. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (Frontcover). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2010). Introduction: Emotions in the field. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the field: The psychology and anthropology of fieldwork experiences (pp. 1–34). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2002). ‘Doing Rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In J. J. Maxine Birch (Ed.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107–122). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5019, pp. 412–454). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., & Allerd, P. (2002). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In J. J. Maxime Birch (Ed.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 32–52). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology the Journal of the British Sociological Association, 12, 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, C. (1998). Articulating Hindu masculinity and femininity: ‘Shuddhi’ and ‘Sangathan’ movements in 1920s. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(13), 727–735.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, C. (2009). Hindu women, Muslim men: Love Jihad and conversions. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(51), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, G. (2010). Hating Israel in the field: On ethnography and political emotion. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the field: The psychology and anthropology of fieldwork experience (pp. 129–154). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. doi: 10.1086/227049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, S. (1996). Relationality and ethnographic subjectivity: Key informants and the construction of personhood in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 107–121). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (1988, September). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290. doi: 10.1177/089124388002003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonz, C. (1987). Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the family and Nazi politics. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, J. (1996). Situating locations: The politics of self, identity, and ‘other’ in living and writing the text. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 185–214). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Treweek, G. (2000). The insight of emotional danger: Research experiences in a home for older people. In G. Lee-Treweek & S. Linkogle (Eds.), Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research (pp. 114–131). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. G. (1993). Secrecy and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nazaruk, M. (2011). Reflexivity in anthropological discourse analysis. Anthropological Notebooks (Slovene Anthropological Society), 17(1), 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. Doing Feminist Research, 30(6), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Obeysekere, G. (1990). The work of culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poonam, S. (2017, May 15). UP’s anti-Romeo squads strike terror: A quiet, gloomy Sunday at Ghaziabad’s biggest park. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/up-s-anti-romeo-squads-strike-terror-a-quiet-gloomy-sunday-at-ghaziabad-s-biggest-park/story-s0oLyrFPCu5ua2bUkO0tFO.html
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. (1996). Whose voice? Whose feelings? Emotions, the theory and practice of feminist methodology. In K. Carter & S. Delamont (Eds.), Qualitative research: The emotional dimension (pp. 1–10). Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, M. (2013). When ‘they’ outbreed ‘us’. [Online]. Retrieved from http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/when--they--outbreed--us-/1182007/0
   Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, R. (1980). Ilongot headhunting, 1883–1974 a study in society and history. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal, M. (2009). The veiled feminist ethnographer: Fieldwork among women of India’s Hindu right. In M. K. Huggins & M.-L. Glebbeek (Eds.), Women fielding danger: Negotiating ethnographic identities in field research (pp. 325–352). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women's Studies International Forum, 11(1), 21–27. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(88)90004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. (1988). Gender issues in field research (Vol. 9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. L. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar