Social media election campaigning: who is working for whom? A conceptual exploration of digital political labour

References

• Berg, M. (2012). Social intermediaries and the location of agency: A conceptual reconfiguration of social network sites. Contemporary Social Science, 7(3), 321–333. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2012.683446
   Google Scholar
• Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2015). Free labour, social media, management: Challenging Marxist organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(4), 473–489. doi: 10.1177/0170840614561568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (2001). The new media and our political communication discontents: Democratizing cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 4(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/713768514
   Google Scholar
• Caraway, B. (2011). Audience labor in the new media environment: A Marxian revisiting of the audience commodity. Media, Culture & Society, 33(5), 693–708. doi: 10.1177/0163443711404463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraway, B. (2016). Crisis of command: Theorizing value in new media. Communication Theory, 26(1), 64–81. doi: 10.1111/comt.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2014). Us congressional campaign communications in an internet age. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 24(1), 20–44. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.832255
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(2), 171–183. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v10i2.392
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Labor in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society, 26(3), 179–196. doi: 10.1080/01972241003712215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2012). Dallas Smythe today – the audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory: Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(2), 692–740. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v10i2.443
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11(2), 237–293. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. W. (2014). Government communication in the digital age: Social media’s effect on local government public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(3), 361–376. doi: 10.1177/2046147X14545371
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2005). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, NY: Pengu.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading,MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. doi:10.1177/0267323112464837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, G., & Maarek, P. (Eds.). (2015). Political parties in the digital age: The impact of new technologies in politics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory/Revue canadienne de theorie politique et sociale, 1(3), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Political public relations: Defining and mapping an emergent field. In J. Strömbäck, & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations: Principles and applications (pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K. D., & Lariscy, R. W. (2008). Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates’ uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 175–198. doi: 10.1080/15531180802178687
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsekeris, C., & Katerelos, I. (2012). Web 2.0, complex networks and social dynamics. Contemporary Social Science, 7(3), 233–246. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2012.721896
   Google Scholar
• Werder, K. P. (2015). The integration of domains: Multidisciplinary approaches to strategic communication campaigns. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(2), 79–86. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2015.1010829
   Google Scholar