Too dangerous for fieldwork? The challenge of institutional risk-management in primary research on conflict, violence and ‘Terrorism’Footnote^*

* An early version of this article was presented in a panel on ‘Moving Moralities: Anthropological Fieldwork and Risk in a Violent World’ at the joint CASCA/IUAES Conference, 6 May 2017, University of Ottawa, Canada.

References

• American Anthropological Association. (2004). American Anthropological Association Statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards. Retrieved from http://research.fiu.edu/documents/irb/documents/ethnographyReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. (2016). Here be dragons: Mapping an ethnography of global danger. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 725–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beek, J., & Göpfort, M. (2013). Police violence in West Africa: Perpetrators’ and ethnographers’ dilemmas. Ethnography, 4, 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Belousov, K., Horlick-Jones, T., Bloor, M., Gilinsky, Y., Golbert, V., Kostikovsky, Y., … Pentsov, D. (2007). Any port in a storm: Fieldwork difficulties in dangerous and crisis-ridden settings. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Boser, S. (2007). Power, ethics and the IRB: Dissonance over human participant review of participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1060–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, J. (2006). Towards IRB reform. Anthropology News, 47(5), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principles. (1993). Health and safety responsibilities of supervisors towards postgraduate and undergraduate students. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, C., Hammond, L., & Pottier, J. (Eds.). (2011). Researching violence in Africa: Ethical and methodological challenges. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). (2007). Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonising the politics of knowledge (pp. 85–98). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R. (2008). The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society, 31(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Diphoorn, T. G. (2015). Etnofoor Call for Papers: Security. Retrieved from http://www.konfliktbearbeitung.net/en/meldungen/etnofoor-call-for-papers-security
   Google Scholar
• Dolnik, A. (Ed.). (2013). Conducting terrorism field research: A guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, E., & Buckley, P. (2017). Embracing qualitative research: A visual model for nuanced research ethics oversight. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edney-Browne, A. (2017). ‘I Saw Pieces of Bodies’: Afghan Civilians Describe Terrorization by US Drones. Truthout, 1 July. Retrieved from http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/41127-i-saw-pieces-of-bodies-afghan-civilians-describe-terrorization-by-us-drones
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., Kirchin, S., & Huxtable, R. (2004). Research ethics committees and paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), 88–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeland, O. (2006). Condescending ethics and action research. Action Research, 4(1), 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, N. (2016). Dangerization is risky business. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 722–723.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. (2014). The ethical turn in anthropology: Promises and uncertainties. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 429–435.
   Google Scholar
• Feenan, D. (2002). Researching paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(2), 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, R. F. (2011). How to avoid being killed in a War zone: The essential guide for dangerous places. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, P. (Ed.). (1986). Women in the field: Anthropological experiences (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. M. (2010). Toward a critical anthropology of security. Current Anthropology, 51(4), 487–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. M. (2014). Qualitative research in dangerous places: Becoming an ‘Ethnographer’ of violence and personal safety. Social Science Research Council Working Papers, DSD Working Papers on Research Security No.1. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gontcharov, I. (2016). Alternative models of ethical governance: The 2016 New Brunswick-Otago Declaration on research ethics. New Zealand Sociology, 31(4), 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2007). Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2006). Are ethics committees ethical? Qualitative Researcher, 2, 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2010). Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research. Social Research Online: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/16.html
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: Controversies and contexts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, A. M. (2016). Reputational risk, academic freedom and research ethics review. Sociology, 50(3), 486–501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodge, G. D. (2013). The problem with ethics. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 286–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoecht, A. (2011). Whose ethics, whose accountability? A debate about university research ethics committees. Ethics and Education, 6(3), 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, N. (1990). Surviving fieldwork: A report of the advisory panel on health and safety in fieldwork. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, M., & Glebbeek, M. (Eds.). (2009). Women fielding danger: Negotiating ethnographic identities in field research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hurdley, R. A. (2010). In the picture or off the wall? Ethical regulation, research habitus, and unpeopled ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 517–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ice, G., Dufour, D., & Stevens, N. (2015). Disasters in field research: Preparing and coping with unexpected events. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R. (2009). Ethical decision-making in social research: A practical guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R. (2015). Research ethics in ethnography/anthropology. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research and Innovation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/ethics-guide-ethnog-anthrop_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. (2006). The case for dangerous fieldwork. In D. Hobbs & R. Wright (Eds.), The Sage handbook of fieldwork (pp. 157–168). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jessee, E. (2013). Rwandan women no more: Female genocidaires in the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. Conflict and Society: Advances in Research, 1, 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Jessee, E. (2015). Introduction: Approaching perpetrators. Conflict and Society, 1, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. S. (2008). Qualitative research in question: A narrative of disciplinary power with/in the IRB. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(2), 212–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchgaessner, S. (2016). Why Was He Killed? Brutal Death of Italian Student in Egypt Confounds Experts. The Guardian, 24 February. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/why-was-he-killed-brutal-death-of-italian-student-in-egypt-confounds-experts
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. A. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klitzman, R. L. (2015). The ethics police?: The struggle to make human research safe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovats-Bernat, J. C. (2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, N. B. (1999). Edgewalkers: Defusing cultural boundaries on the new global frontiers. Far Hills, NJ: New Horizon.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, R. (2006). The perils of working at home: IRB ‘Mission Creep’ as context and content for an ethnography of disciplinary knowledge. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 482–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, R. (2007). Educate your IRB. Anthropology News, 48(6), 33–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M. (Ed.). (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M. (Ed.). (1995). Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., & Stanko, E. (Eds.). (2003). Researching violence: Essays on methodology and measurement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2008). New strategies of control: Academic freedom and research ethics boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 684–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Tierney, W. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maček, I. (Ed.). (2014). Engaging violence: Trauma, memory and representation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, J., & Tolich, M. (2015). Shifting from research governance to research ethics: A novel paradigm for ethical review in community-based research. Research Ethics, 11(4), 178–191.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, P. A. (2003). Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2), 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurana, D., Jacobsen, K., & Gale, L. (Eds.). (2013). Research methods in conflict settings: A view from below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAreavey, R., & Muir, J. (2011). Research ethics committees: Values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(5), 391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L., O’Dwyer, M., & Gabe, J. (2012). Seeking university research ethics committee approval: The emotional vicissitudes of a ‘Rationalised’ Process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L., Pushor, D., & Renihan, P. (2011). Reflections on the ethics approval process. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil, W. (2008). Guiding principles for human rights field officers working in conflict and post-conflict environments. Nottingham: Human Rights law Centre, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, M. (2006). Conflict and convergence: The ethics review of action research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4(1/4), 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, N., & O’Reilly, M. (2013). ‘We Are Alone in the House’: A case study addressing researcher safety and risk. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10, 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, B., Gregory, D., & Thorne, S. (1999). A protocol for researcher safety. Qualitative Health Research, 9(2), 259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peritore, N. P. (1990). Reflections on dangerous fieldwork. American Sociologist, 21(4), 359–372.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, E., Robinson, G., Smyth, M., Schnabel, A., & Osaghae, E. (Eds.). (2005). Researching conflict in Africa: Insights and experiences. New York, NY: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Possick, C. (2009). Reflexive positioning in a politically sensitive situation: Dealing with the threats of researching West Bank Settler experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 859–875.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, I. A. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, C., & Breif, E. (2009). Confronting condescending ethics: How community-based research challenges traditional approaches to consent, confidentiality, and capacity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(1), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Renzetti, C., & Lee, R. M. (Eds.). (1993). Researching sensitive topics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robben, A. C. G. M. (2010). Ethnographic imagination at a distance: An introduction to the anthropological study of the Iraq War. In A. C. G. M. Robben (Ed.), Iraq at a distance: What anthropologists can teach us about the War (pp. 1–23). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robben, A. C. G. M., & Nordstrom, C. (1995). The anthropology and ethnography of violence and sociopolitical conflict. In C. Nordstrom & A. C. G. M. Robben (Eds.), Fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and culture (pp. 1–24). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, D. W. (2007). Joining the gang and becoming a broder: The violence of ethnography in contemporary Nicaragua. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 26(4), 444–461.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. E. (2015). The censor’s hand: The misregulation of human-subject research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965-2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The pressing need for ethical education: A commentary on the growing IRB controversy. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonising the politics of knowledge (pp. 85–98). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., & Piper, H. (2010). Ethical research, academic freedom and the rule of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 33(3), 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (1989). I’m alive and well, my kneecaps are still intact, and my research is coming along fine. In Prologue in hearts and minds, water and fish: Popular support for the IRA and INLA in a Northern Irish Ghetto (pp. 1–40). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (1990). Participant-Observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization, 49(2), 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (1995). Reflections on managing danger in fieldwork: Dangerous anthropology in Belfast. In C. Nordstrom & A. C. G. M. Robben (Eds.), Fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and survival (pp. 276–294). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (2012). Staying alive while conducting primary research: Fieldwork on political violence. In M. Breen-Smyth (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to political violence (pp. 302–325). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (2015). Managing danger in fieldwork with perpetrators of political violence and state terror. Conflict and Society: Advances in Research, 1(1), 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, M., & Robinson, G. (Eds.). (2001). Researching violently divided societies: Ethical and methodological issues. New York, NY: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sriram, C., King, J., Mertus, J., Martin-Ortega, O., & Herman, J. (Eds.). (2009). Surviving field research: Working in violent and difficult situations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, L. (2012). Behind closed doors: IRBs and the making of ethical research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart-Withers, R. R. (2016). Edge walking ethics. New Zealand Sociology, 31(4), 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, A., & Coomber, V. (2004). University research ethics committees: Their role, remit and conduct. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich, M. (2016). A narrative account of ethics committees and their codes. New Zealand Sociology, 31(4), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich, M., & Fitzgerald, M. (2006). If ethics committees were designed for ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolich, M., & Marlow, J. (2016). Evolving power dynamics in an unconventional, powerless ethics committee. Research Ethics, 13(1), 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich, M., & Smith, B. P. (2015). The politicisation of ethics review in New Zealand. Auckland: Dunmore.
   Google Scholar
• Tolich, M., & Tumelty, E. (2014). Making ethics review a learning institution: The ethics application repository proof of concept – tear.otago.ac.nz. Qualitative Research, 14(2), 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turse, N. (2017). American Special Ops Forces Have Deployed to 70 Percent of the World’s Countries in 2017. The Nation, 26 June. https://www.thenation.com/article/american-special-ops-forces-have-deployed-to-70-percent-of-the-worlds-countries-in-2017/
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2001). Is research-ethics review a moral panic? Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(1), 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C. (Ed.). (2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2006). New angles and tangles in the ethics review of research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4, 261–274.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2013). The ‘Ethics Rupture’ summit, fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(1), 3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C., & Hamilton, A. (eds.). (2016). The ethics rupture: Exploring alternatives to formal research-ethics reviews. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dongen, E. (2007). Farewell to fieldwork? Constraints in anthropological research in violent situations. In R. Littlewood (Ed.), On knowing and not knowing in the anthropology of medicine (pp. 160–171). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, C., & Overton, J. (2006). ‘Unethical Ethics?’: Applying research ethics in Uzbekistan. Development in Practice, 16(1), 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Warden, T. S. (2013). Feet of clay: Confronting emotional challenges in ethnographic experience. Journal of Organisational Ethnography, 2(2), 150–173.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Dunlap, E., Johnson, B., & Hamid, A. (1992). Personal safety in dangerous places. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 21(3), 343–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaworsky, W., & Wladyka, D. (2018). War in the feudal zone: State failure and the abandonment of anthropological research in Mexico and Central America. War and Society, 38(1), forthcoming.
   Google Scholar