A feeling for democracy? Rhetoric, power and the emotions

References

• Ahmed, S., 2004. Affective economies. Social Text 79, 22 (2), 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News, 2009. Angry scenes face Griffin at BBC. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8321157.stm[ Accessed 17 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 2004. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, M., 2006. Becoming a subject: reflections in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W.E., 2002. Neuropolitics: thinking, culture, speed. London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craib, I., 2001. Psychoanalysis: a critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A., 1994. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A., 1999. The feeling of what happens: body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2010. Rhetoric in democracy: a systemic appreciation. Political Theory, 38 (3), 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., 2010. The third generation of deliberative democracy. Political Studies Review, 8 (3), 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S., 2009. When the people speak: deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997. The ethics of the concern for the self as a practice of freedom. In: P. Rabinow, ed. Ethics: subjectivity and truth. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. vol. 1. London: Penguin, 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J.D. and Frank, J.B., 1991. Persuasion and healing: a comparative study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S., 1991. Civilization, society and religion: group psychology, civilization and its discontents and other works. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S., 2005. Mourning and melancholia. In: S. Freud and A. Phillips, eds. On murder, mourning and melancholia. London: Penguin, 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, B., 2006. Saving persuasion: a defense of rhetoric and judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R.E., 2008. Innovating democracy: democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D.M., 2006. The secret history of emotion: from Aristotle’s rhetoric to modern brian science. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996a. What is universal pragmatics? In: W. Outhwaite, ed. The Habermas reader. Cambridge: Polity, 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996b. Discourse ethics. In: W. Outhwaite, ed. The Habermas reader. Cambridge: Polity, 180–192.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, G.S. and O’Donnell, V., 2006. Propaganda and persuasion. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., 2002. Moral politics: how liberals and conservatives think. 2nd ed. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., 2008. The political mind: why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th century brain. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G.E., 2002. The sentimental citizen: emotion in democratic politics. Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, A.J., 2007. Aversive democracy: inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K., 2011. Legitimate speech and hegemonic idiom: the limits of deliberative democracy in the diversity of its voices. Political Studies, 59 (3), 527–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51 (1), 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., 2006. Deliberating in the real world: problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., 2007. Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M., 2002. Deliberative democracy. In: A. Carter and G. Stokes, eds. Democratic theory today: challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge: Polity, 173–202.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., 2007. The political brain: the role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Yack, B., 2006. Rhetoric and public reasoning: an aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory, 34 (4), 417–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar