Who governs? Power in the local Russian community

References

• Agger, R.E., Goldrich, D., and Swanson, B.E., 1964. The rulers and the ruled. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chirikova, A., 2010. Regional’niye eliti Rossii [Russian regional elites]. Moscow: Aspect Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.S. and Imbroscio, D.L., 2009. Introduction: urban politics in the twenty-first century. In: J.S. Davis and D.L. Imbroscio, eds. Theories of Urban Politics. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2001. Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (1), 7–19.10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2011. Regime theory in urban politics. In: K. Dowdind, ed. Encyclopedia of power. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 562–563.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D., Margetts, H., and Rydin, Y., 1999. Regime politics in London local government. Urban Affairs Review, 34 (4), 515–545.10.1177/10780879922184068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkin, S., 1987. City and regime in the American republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S.S., 1994. The city builders: property, politics, and planning in London and New York. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ferman, B., 1996. Challenging the growth machine. Neighbourhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburg. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C., 1937. Constitutional government and politics. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Gaman-Golutvina, O., 2004. Regional’niye eliti: personal’niy sostav i tendentsii evolutsii [Regional elites: personal composition and evolution trends]. In: Samiye vliyatel’niye ludi Rossii – 2003. Moscow: Institut situatsionnogo analiza i novikh tekhnologiy, 36–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. and Ryzhenkov, S., 2011. Local regimes, sub-national governance and the ‘power vertical’ in contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63 (3), 449–465.10.1080/09668136.2011.557538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V., Ryzhenkov, S., and Brie, M., eds., 2000. Rossiya regionov: transformatsiya politicheskikh rezhimov [Regional Russia: transformation of political regimes]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V., Ryzhenkov, S., Y., Belokurova, and Borisova, N., 2002. Avtonomiya ili kontol’? Reforma mestnoy vlasti v gorodakh Rossii, 1991–2001 [Autonomy or control? Reform of local government in the Russian cities, 1991–2001]. St. Petersburg: European University in St. Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., 1999. Review article: north urban political economy, urban theory and British research. British Journal of Political Science, 29 (4), 673–698.10.1017/S0007123499000320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, A., 2000. Regime formation in Manchester and Edinburgh. In: G. Stoker, ed. The New Politics of British Local Government. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., 2009. The history of community power. In: J.S. Davis and D.L. Imbrosio, eds. Theories of urban politics. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 27–39.10.4135/9781446279298
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D.M., 2000. Urban policy and politics in Britain. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, N., 2007. Following the signs: applying urban regime analysis to a UK case study. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29 (5), 435–453.10.1111/juaf.2007.29.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, F., 1953. Community power structure. A study of decision-makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. and Cole, A., 1998. Urban regimes and local governance in Britain and France: policy adaption and coordination in Leeds and Lille. Urban Affairs Review, 33 (3), 382–404.10.1177/107808749803300307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, P. and Cole, A., 2001. Local governance in England and France. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., Savitch, H.V., and Haddock, S.V., 1997. The political economy of urban regimes: a comparative perspective. Urban Affairs review, 32 (3), 348–377.10.1177/107808749703200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, F., 2009a. A new form of urban governance? The polity, politics and policy of urban development in post-socialist Warsaw. In: Living in the 21st century city. Contributions to the 13th Berlin-Amsterdam conference. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies, 129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, F., 2009b. Housing markets and urban regime: the case of Warsaw. In: F. Eckardt and I. Elander, eds. Urban governance in Europe. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 333–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kulcsar, L. and Domokos, T., 2005. The post-socialist growth machine: the case of Hungary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (3), 550–563.10.1111/ijur.2005.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapina, N., 1998. Biznes i politika v sovremennoy Rossii [Business and politics in contemporary Russia]. Moscow: INION.
   Google Scholar
• Lapina, N. and Chirikova, A., 1999. Regional’niye eliti v RF: modeli povedeniya I politicheskiye orientatsii [Regional elite in RF: models of behavior and political orientations]. Moscow: INION.
   Google Scholar
• Ledyaev, V., 2008. Domination, power and authority in Russia: basic characteristics and forms. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24 (1), 17–36.10.1080/13523270701840423
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. and Molotch, H., 1987. Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 1970. International community power structure. Comparative studies of four world cities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., 1976. The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (2), 309–355.10.1086/ajs.1976.82.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., 2009. Urban regime analysis. In: J.S. Davis and D.L. Imbrosio, eds. Theories of urban politics. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 40–54.10.4135/9781446279298
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G., 2001. The evolution of urban regime theory. The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36 (6), 810–835.10.1177/10780870122185109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazukina, M. and Sulimov, K., 2008. Simvolicheskaya reprezentatsiya lokal’nikh politicheskikh soobschestv: Permskiy kray i Sverdlovskaya oblast’ [Symbolic representation of local political communities: Perm and Sverdlovsk regions]. Politicheskaya nauka, 3, 158–174.
   Google Scholar
• Oleinik, A., 2010. Market as a weapon: the socio-economic machinery of dominance in Russia. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Panov, P., 2008. Lokal’naya politika v raznikh izmereniyakh [Local politics in different dimensions]. Politicheskaya nauka, 3, 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Podvintsev, O., ed., 2007. Takaya raznaya Rossiya [Such a different Russia]. Perm: Tipografiya kuptsa Tarasova.
   Google Scholar
• Ryabova, O., 2008. Gradoobrazu’uschiye predpriyatiya i politicheskiye protsessi v malikh promyshlennikh gorodakh Urala [Core enterprises and political processes in small Ural industrial towns]. Politicheskaya nauka, 3, 224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Ryabova, O. and Vitkovskaya, T., 2011. Monogoroda Srednego Urala: lokal’niye eliti i politicheskiye protsessi [Monotowns of Middle Urals: local elites and political processes]. Ekaterinburg: RIO URO RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, I., 2008. Regions, new regionalism and regime theory: deciphering post-socialist institutional change. In: J.W. Scott, ed. De-coding new regionalism. Shifting socio-political contexts in Central Europe and Latin America. Ashgate: Aldershot, 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Seltser, D., 2006. Vzleti i padeniya nomenklaturi [Ups and downs of nomenclature]. Tambov: Tambovpoligrafizdat.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C.N., 1989. Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C.N., 1993. Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15 (1), 1–28.10.1111/juaf.1993.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C.N., 2001. The Atlanta experience re-examined: the link between agenda and regime change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (1), 20–34.10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C.N., 2005. Looking back to look forward. Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40 (3), 309–341.10.1177/1078087404270646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C.N., 2006. Power, reform and urban regime analysis. City and Community, 5 (1), 23–38.10.1111/cico.2006.5.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Strom, E., 1996. In search of the growth coalition. American urban theories and the redevelopment of Berlin. Urban Affairs Review, 31 (4), 455–481.10.1177/107808749603100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tev, D., 2006. Politeconomicheskiy podhod v analize mestnoy vlasti. K voprosu o koalitsii, praviaschey v Sankt-Peterburge [Political economy approach in the analysis of local government], 2 (2), 99–121.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D.H., 2002. Power. It’s forms, bases, and uses. 3rd ed. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar