The art of democracy: constitutive power and the limits of dissensus

References

• Ahwan, L. 2002. 50 sew up lips in hunger strike, detainees claim [online]. The Age, 27 June. Available from: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/06/27/1023864626046.html.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 2005. The promise of politics. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L., 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October, 110, 51–79.10.1162/0162287042379810
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., 2006. The social turn: collaboration and its discontents. Artforum, 44, 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., 2012. Participation and spectacle: where are we now? In: N. Thompson, ed. Living as form: socially engaged art from 1991–2011. New York: Creative Time, 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E., 2005. The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N., 1998. Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Le Presses du Réel.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997a. The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In: P. Rabinow, ed. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, volume I: ethics, subjectivity and truth. New York: The New Press, 281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997b. What is enlightenment? In: P. Rabinow, ed. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, volume I: ethics, subjectivity and truth. New York: The New Press, 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2007. Security, territory, population. In: M. Senellart, ed. Lectures at the Collège de France. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 1977–1978.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of communicative action volume 1. Reason and the rationalisation of society. T. McCarthy (trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1987. Theory of communicative action volume 2. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. T. McCarthy (trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms. W. Rehg (trans). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., ed., 2002. Power: a reader. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. and Ryan, K., eds., 2012. Political power: the development of the field. Leverkusen Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B., 2012. Eventwork: the fourfold matrix of contemporary social movements. In: N. Thompson, ed. Living as form: socially engaged art from 1991–2011. New York: Creative Time, 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G., 2011. The one and the many: contemporary collaborative art in a global context. London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394037
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G., 2012. Conversation pieces: the role of dialogue in socially-engaged art. In: Z. Kocur and S. Leung, eds. Theory in contemporary art since 1985. Oxford: Wiley, 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, M., 2012. Returning on bikes: notes on social practice. In: N. Thompson, ed. Living as form: socially engaged art from 1991–2011. New York: Creative Time, 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, K., 2002. Refugee camp children sew their lips in protest. The Independent, 22 January. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/refugee-camp-children-sew-their-lips-in-protest-664504.html.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, D. and McKay, C., 2002. The worst of Woomera. Sydney South: Refugee Embassy.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2007. Artistic activism and agonistic spaces. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 1, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2013. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Park Fiction, 2013. Introduction in English. Available from: http://park-fiction.net/park-fiction-introduction-in-english/ [Accessed 10 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., 1992. Politics, identification, and subjectivization. October, 61, 58–64.10.2307/778785
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., 2004. The politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., 2010. Dissensus. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, J., 2006. Socially engaged art, critics and discontents: an interview with Claire Bishop. Community Arts Network. Available from: http://www.apionline.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rockhill, G., 2004. Translator’s introduction. Rancière, J., The politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K., 2008. On power, habitus, and (in)civility: Foucault meets Elias meets Bauman in the playground. Journal of Power, 1 (3), 251–274.10.1080/17540290802479178
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K., 2014. Childhood, biosocial power, and the ‘anthropological machine: life as a governable process? Critical Horizons, 15 (3), 266–283.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, C., 2004. The city is unwritten. In: B. Bloom and A. Bromberg, eds. Belltown paradise/making their own plans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., 1996. On the concept of the political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, S. and Margolles, T., 2004. Santiago Sierra by Teresa Margolles: artists in conversation. BOMB, 86. Available from: http://bombmagazine.org/article/2606/santiago-sierra.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y., 2012. Challenges of re-politicisation. Third Text, 26, 551–565.10.1080/09528822.2012.712771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., 2012. Living as form. In: N. Thompson, ed. Living as form: socially engaged art from 1991–2011. New York: Creative Time, 16–33.
   Google Scholar