‘Watch out for politics’: exit, voice and other strategies of discontent in late Czech socialism

References

• Ekiert, G., 1997. Rebellious poles: political crises and popular protest under state socialism, 1945–89. East European Politics and Societies, 11 (2), 299–338.10.1177/0888325497011002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidelius, P., 1986. L’esprit post-totalitaire. Paris: Grasset.
   Google Scholar
• Gablasová, D., 2008. And then they made me the director general. Agency in biographical narratives. In: 11th New Zealand language and society conference, November, Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Gablasová, D., 2009. Tehdy sa tomu tak neríkalo. Lingvistická analýza diskurzu v autobiografických rozhovoroch [They didn’t call it that then. A linguistic analysis of discourse in biographical narratives]. In: M. Vaněk, ed., Obyčejní lidé…?! Pohled do života tzv. mlčící většiny. Životopisná vyprávění příslušníků dělnických profesí a inteligence [Ordinary people...?! An insight into the lives of the «silent majority». Biographical narratives of members of the working class and the intelligentsia]. Praha: Academia, 97–132.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, S., 2005. Language ideologies compared. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15 (1), 23–37.10.1525/jlin.2005.15.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1961. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J.W. and Keeley, M., 1992. Hirschman’s loyalty construct. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5 (3), 191–200.10.1007/BF01385047
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A., 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, M., et al., 2004. Výklady komunistického vládnutí – závěrečná interpretace [Explications of the communist rule – a final interpretation]. In: J. Kabele, ed., Výklady vládnutí v reálném socialismu [Explications of the communist rule]. Praha: Matfyz Press, 7–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S.E., 1995. Social theory and the post-Soviet crisis. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28 (1), 119–130.10.1016/0967-067X(95)00007-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havel, V., 1992 [1978]. The power of the powerless. In: P. Wilson, ed. Open letters: selected writings: 1965–1990. New York: Vintage Books, 125–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A.O., 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabele, J., 2010. The agency/structure dilemma: a coordination solution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40 (3), 314–338.10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornai, J., 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J., 1992. The socialist system. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1093/0198287763.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, J., 2005. Society, resistance and revolution: the budapest middle class and the Hungarian Communist State 1948–56. The English Historical Review, 120 (488), 963–986.10.1093/ehr/cei242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., 2000. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online], 1 (2). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm [Accessed 19 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K., 1957. Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Možný, I., [1991] 2009. Proč tak snadno… Některé rodinné důvody sametové revoluce [Why so easy... some family motives of Velvet revolution]. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C., 1996. Designing institutions in East European transitions. In: R.E. Goodin, ed. The theory of institutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–226.10.1017/CBO9780511558320
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, N., 1999. Soviet work attitudes and politics, 1953–91: a preliminary historical sociology. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 45 (1), 78–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, D., 2002. Mass pressures, elite responses – roots of democratization: the case of the GDR. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35 (3), 305–324.10.1016/S0967-067X(02)00011-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C.E., Zembrodt, I.M. and Gunn, L.K., 1982. Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (6), 123–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutland, P., 1993. Sovietology: notes for a post-mortem. National Interest, 31, 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selltiz, D., et al., 1962. Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spires, A., 2011. Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117 (1), 1–45.10.1086/660741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straughn, J.B., 2005. ‘Taking the state at its word’: the arts of consentful contention in the German Democratic Republic. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (6), 1598–1650.10.1086/ajs.2005.110.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelenyi, I. and Szelenyi, B., 1994. Why socialism failed: toward a theory of system breakdown? Causes of disintegration of East European state socialism. Theory and Society, 23 (2), 211–231.10.1007/BF00993815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Y., 1995. Mass alienation under state socialism and after. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28 (2), 215–237.10.1016/0967-067X(95)00012-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaněk, M., ed., 2009. Obyčejní lidé…?! Pohled do života tzv. mlčící většiny. Životopisná vyprávění příslušníků dělnických profesí a inteligence [Ordinary people...?! An insight into the lives of the «silent majority». Biographical narratives of members of the working class and the intelligentsia]. Praha: Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Vaněk, M. and Urbášek, P., eds., 2005. Vítězové? Poražení? I.+II. díl: Životopisná interview I.díl Disent v období tzv. normalizace II.díl Politické elity v období tzv. normalizace [Winners? Defeated? Life story interviews. Part I: dissent during the time of normalisation. Part II: political elites during the time of normalisation]. Praha: Prostor.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K., 1996. What was socialism, and what comes next? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yurchak, A., 2003. Soviet hegemony of form: everything was forever, until it was no more. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45 (3), 480–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar