Power and future people’s freedom: intergenerational domination, climate change, and constitutionalism

References

• Alexander, L., 2011. What are constitutions, and what should (and can) they do? In: E. Frank Paul, F.D. Miller Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, eds. What should constitutions do? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Amar, A.R., 1994. The consent of the governed: constitutional amendment outside Article V. Columbia Law Review, 94, 457–508.10.2307/1123201
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., 2008. Republicanism, democracy and constitutionalism. In: C. Laborde and J. Maynor, eds. Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 159–189.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, Gwilym David, 2015. On the source, site and modes of domination. Journal of Political Power, 8 (1), 5–20.10.1080/2158379X.2015.1010800
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2011. Children and the rights of citizens: non-domination and intergenerational justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2014. Republican citizenship. In: H.-A. van der Heijden, ed. Handbook of political citizenship and social movements. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar, 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J., 2015. Domination, global harms and injustice: expanding transnational republicanism. In: B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys, and T. Waligore, eds. Domination and global political justice. Conceptual, historial and institutional perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge, 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, I., 2004. Choice, freedom, and freedom of choice. Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 61–81.10.1007/s00355-003-0277-z
   Google Scholar
• Dagger, R., 2005. Autonomy, domination, and the republican challenge to liberalism. In: J. Christman and J. Anderson, eds. Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–203.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 2004. The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekeli, K.S., 2007. Green constitutionalism: the constitutional protection of future generations. Ratio Juris, 20, 378–401.10.1111/raju.2007.20.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., and Melton, J., 2009. The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817595
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S.M., 2013. Human rights in a hostile climate. In: C. Holder and D. Reidy, eds. Human rights. The hard questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., 2011. Constitutional endurance. In: T. Ginsburg and R. Dixon, eds. Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 112–125.
   Google Scholar
• Gosseries, A., 2008a. On future generations’ future rights. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16, 446–474.10.1111/jopp.2008.16.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Gosseries, A., 2008b. Constitutions and future generations. The Good Society, 17, 32–37.10.1353/gso.0.0044
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D., 2014. Reason in a dark time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337668.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Karnein, A., 2012. A theory of unborn life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782475.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S., 2013. Beyond non-domination: agency, inequality and the meaning of freedom. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 39, 187–208.10.1177/0191453712470360
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., 2010. Republicanism and global justice: a sketch. European Journal of Political Theory, 9, 48–69.10.1177/1474885109349404
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., 2013. Republicanism. In: M. Freeden, ed. The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C. and Maynor, J., 2008. The republican contribution to political theory. In: C. Laborde and J. Maynor, eds. Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C., 2003. Liberal and republican conceptions of freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6, 96–119.10.1080/13698230510001702693
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R.J., 2008. Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., 2005. How to measure constitutional rigidity four concepts and two alternatives. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17, 329–361.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2010. A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2012. What counts as arbitrary power? Journal of Political Power, 5, 137–152.10.1080/2158379X.2012.660026
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. and Pettit, P., 2009. Neorepublicanism: a normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 11–29.10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.120952
   Google Scholar
• Nolt, J., 2011. Greenhouse gas emission and the domination of posterity. In: D.G. Arnold, ed. The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 60–76.10.1017/CBO9780511732294
   Google Scholar
• Nolt, J., 2014. Climate change, intergenerational justice and the University. In: J. Shefner, H.F. Dahms, R.E. Jones, and A. Jalata, eds. Social justice and the University. London: Palgrave, 114–127.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, T., 2015. Disability and domination: lessons from republican political philosophy. Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi:10.1111/japp.12149.
   Google Scholar
• Otsuka, M., 2003. Libertarianism without inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/0199243956.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2013. A non-normative theory of power and domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16, 614–633.10.1080/13698230.2012.691204
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2006. Freedom in the market. Politics Philosophy Economics, 5, 131–149.10.1177/1470594X06064218
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2008. Republican liberty: three axioms, four theorems. In: C. Laborde and J. Maynor, eds. Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 102–132.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2012. On the people’s terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017428
   Google Scholar
• Rendall, M., 2011. Non-identity, sufficiency and exploitation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 19, 229–247.10.1111/jopp.2011.19.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H., 2002. Democratic autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roznai, Y., 2014. Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a study of the nature and limits of constitutional amendment powers. Unpublished PhD thesis. The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, D., 2015. Power to the people: freedom as non-domination, disabling constraints and the eyeball test. Journal of Political Power, 8 (3), 363–384.10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095847
   Google Scholar
• Schuppert, F., 2015. Non-domination, non-alienation and social equality: towards a republican understanding of equality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18 (4), 440–455.10.1080/13698230.2015.1033863
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., 2012. On non-domination. University of Toronto Law Journal, 62, 293–335.
   Google Scholar
• Shnayderman, R., 2012. Liberal vs. republican notions of freedom. Political Studies, 60, 44–58.10.1111/post.2012.60.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P.T., 2014. The intergenerational storm: dilemma or domination. Philosophy and Public Issues, 3, 207–244.
   Google Scholar
• Stoljar, N., 2003. Survey article: interpretation, indeterminacy and authority: some recent controversies in the philosophy of law. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 470–498.10.1046/j.1467-9760.2003.00186.x
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., 2005. Democracy in time: popular sovereignty and temporal representation. Constellations, 12, 245–261.10.1111/cons.2005.12.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Tremmel, J.C., 2014. The non-identity problem: an irrefutable argument against representation of future generations? In: J. E and M. Remig, eds. Theories of sustainable development. London: Routledge, 126–144.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Rijt, J.W., 2011. The importance of assent. A theory of coercion and dignity. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vercelli, A., 1998. Sustainable development and the freedom of future generations. In: G. Chichilnisky, ed. Sustainability: dynamics and uncertainty. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 171–187.10.1007/978-94-011-4892-4
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, F., 2011. Slaves, prisoners, and republican freedom. Res Publica, 17, 175–192.10.1007/s11158-011-9151-5
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.-M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar