Phronetic science: a Nietzschean moment?

References

• Åkerstrøm-Andersen, N., 2003. Discursive analytical strategies: understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Chicago, IL: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amariglio, J., 2001. Writing in thirds. In: J. Amariglio, S.E. Cullenberg, and D.F. Ruccio, eds. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, K., 1984. Understanding and explanation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle, 1980. Nichomachean ethics. Translated by David Ross, edited by John Lloyd Ackrill and James Opie Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W.C., 1974. Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., 2009. Science in democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013246.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S., 2001. Modernism and postmodernism: a dialectical analysis. In: J. Amariglio, S.E. Cullenberg, and D.F. Ruccio, eds. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge, 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S., 1990. What is moral maturity: a phenomenological account of the development of expertise. In: D. Rasmussen, ed. Universalism vs. communitarianism. Cambridge: MIT Press, 237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P., eds., 1982. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, M., 1985. The ancient economy. London: The Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1993. Aristotle, Foucault, and progressive Phronesis: outline of an applied ethics for sustainable development. In: E. Winkler and J. Coombs, eds. Applied ethics: a reader. New York: Basil Blackwell, 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society? The British Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), 210–233.10.2307/591310
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2001. Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810503
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. A Perestroikan straw man answers back: David Laitin and phronetic political science. In: S.F. Schram and B. Caterino, eds. Making political science matter: debating knowledge, research, and method. New York: New York University Press, 56–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, B., 1993. Hegemony and power: on the relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1973. The birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In: D.F. Bouchard, ed. Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 139–164.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews & other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1984. What is enlightenment? In: P. Rabinow, ed. The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon, 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1986. Kant on enlightenment and revolution. Economy and Society, 15 (1), 88–96.10.1080/03085148600000016
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1996. What is critique. In: J. Schmidt, ed. What is enlightenment? Eighteenth century answers to twentieth century questions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 382–398.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2008. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the college de France, 1978–1979. Senellars, M., ed., Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guignon, C., 1993. Authenticity, moral values, and psychotherapy. In: Ch. Guignon, ed. The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, R., and Milberg, W., 1995. The crisis of vision in modern economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., 1974. Nietzsche: philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., 1991. Towards the native’s point of view. In: D. Lavoie, ed. Economics and hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., 2001. Late modernism and the loss of character in economics. In: J. Amariglio, S.E. Cullenberg, and D.F. Ruccio, eds. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., 2007. Speaking of economics: how to get in the conversation. New York: Routledge.10.4324/SE0085
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1990. Paradigm lost: Über die ethische reflexion der moral [Paradigm lost: On the ethical reflection of morality]. Munchen: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1995. Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A., 2007. After virtue. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D., 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21 (2), 481–517.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D., 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D., 1994. Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511599347
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D., 1995. Modern epistemology against analytic philosophy: a reply to Maki. Journal of Economic Literature, 33 (3), 1319–1323.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D., 2001. The genealogy of postmodernism: an economist’s guide. In: J. Amariglio, S.E. Cullenberg, and D.F. Ruccio, eds. Postmodernism, economics and knowledge. London: Routledge, 102–128.
   Google Scholar
• Meikle, S., 1991. Aristotle on equality and market exchange. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 111, 193–196.10.2307/631900
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. and Rose, N., 2003. The essential Foucault: selections from the essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 1993. Rhetoric and conceptual changes. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 3, 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 2002. Visions of politics: regarding method. Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S., 2001. Return to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voparil, C.J. and Bernstein, R., 2010. The rorty reader. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar