Not only Relational but also Structural: revisiting the resolution of the 1998 October crisis through elements of structural power

References

• Alantar, Ö.Z.O., 2000/2001. Turkish-Syrian relations at the crossroads. Turkish Review of Middle East Studies, 11, 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Alantar, Ö.Z.O., 2001. The October 1998 crisis: the change of heart of Turkish foreign policy towards Syria? CEMOTI, 31, 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Taqi, S. and Hinnebusch, R., 2013. As seen from damascus: the transformation in Syrian-Turkish relations. In: R. Hinnebusch and Ö. Tür, eds. Turkey-Syria relations: between enmity and amity. London: Routledge, 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Altunışık, M.B. and Tür, Ö., 2006. From distant neighbors to partners? Changing Syrian-Turkish relations. Security Dialogue, 37 (2), 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras, D., 2009. The role of motivation in the success of coercive diplomacy: the 1998 Turkish-Syrian crisis as a case study. Defense Studies, 9 (2), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Aykan, M.A., 1999. The Turkish-Syrian crisis of October 1998: a Turkish view. Middle East Policy, 10 (4), 174–191.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 1979. Power analysis and world politics: new trends versus old tendencies. World Politics, 31 (2), 161–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2011a. Domain. In: K. Dowding, ed.. Encyclopedia of power. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 201.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2011b. Scope. In: K. Dowding, ed.. Encyclopedia of power. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 586.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2013 [2002]. Power and international relations. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons, eds. Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles: SAGE, 273–297.
   Google Scholar
• Barkey, H.J., 1993. Turkey’s Kurdish Dilemma. Survival, 35 (4), 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., 1999. Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (1), 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Duvall, R., 2005. Power in international politics. International Organization, 59 (1), 39–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., 2007. Thinking about power. In: F. Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams, eds. Power in world politics. London: Routledge, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A., 1978. Introduction to the special issue of international organization on dependence and dependency in the global system. International Organization, 32 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A. and Haggard, S., 1989. Power in the international political economy. In: R.J. Stoll and M.D. Ward, eds. Power in world politics. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 99–121.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T., 2005. International institutions and socialization in Europe: introduction and framework. International Organization, 59 (4), 801–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collelo, T., 1988. Syria, A country study. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W., 1992. Multilateralism and world order. Review of International Studies, 18 (2), 161–180.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2 (3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R.L., 1993. Foreign policy as social construction: a post-positivist analysis of US counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37 (3), 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehteshami, A. and Hinnebusch, R., 1997. Syria and Iran: middle powers in a penetrated regional system. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. and Wendt, A., 2002. Rationalism v. constructivism: a skeptical view. In: W. Carlnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons, eds. Handbook of international relations. London: Sage, 52–72.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1979. Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. and Law, D., 1988. The global political economy: perspectives, problems, and policies. New York: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. and Law, D., 1989. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (4), 475–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 1993. Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis. International Organizations, 47 (3), 443–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gywnn, M.A., 2019. Structural power and international regimes. Journal of Political Power, 12 (2), 200–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, A., 1992. Iraq: the Pariah state. Current History, 91, 11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch, R., 2002. The foreign policy of Syria. In: R. Hinnebusch and A. Ehteshami, eds. The foreign policies of Middle East States. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 141–166.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K.J., 1964. The concept of power in the study of international relations. Background, 7 (4), 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hopf, T., 1998. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23 (1), 171–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, T., 2010. The logic of habit in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16 (4), 539–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S.B., 1954. The power inventory and national strategy. World Politics, 6 (4), 421–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmon, E., 1999. A solution to Syrian terrorim. Middle East Quarterly, 6 (2). Available from: https://www.meforum.org/464/a-solution-to-syrian-terrorism [Accessed 4 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroğlu, A., 2013. Turkey-Syria water relations: institutional development and political confrontations in the Euphrates and Tigris region. In: R. Hinnebusch and Ö. Tür, eds.. Turkey-Syria Relations: between Enmity and Amity. London and New York: Routledge, 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kienle, E., 1994. Syria, the Kuwait war, and the new world order. In: T.Y. Ismael and J.S. Ismael, eds. The Gulf war and the new world order: international relations of the middle east. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 383–398.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H.D. and Kaplan, A., 1950. Power and society: a framework for political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005 [1974]. Power: a radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Makovsky, A., 1999. Defusing the Turkish-Syrian crisis: whose triumph? The Washington Institute, January/February, Available from: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/defusing-the-turkish-syrian-crisis-whose-triumph [Accessed 4 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1986. The sources of social power, volume 1: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1993. The sources of social power, volume 2: the rise of classes and nation-states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1760–1914.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52 (4), 943–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L.G., 2000. Turkey’s national security in the middle east. Turkish Studies, 1 (1), 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., 2008. Constructivism. In: P.D. Williams, ed. Security studies: an introduction. Oxon: Routledge, 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Milliyet, October 10, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Muslih, M., 1996. Syria and Turkey: uneasy relations. In: H.J. Barkey, ed. Reluctant Neighbor: turkey’s role in the middle east. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, J., 1975. The descriptive analysis of power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oktav, Z.Ö., 2003. Water dispute and Kurdish separatism in Turkish-Syrian relations. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 34, 91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R.W., 1997. Turkey-Syria relations since the Gulf War: kurds and water. Middle East Policy, 5 (2), 168–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R.W., 2001. Turkey’s relations with Iran, Syria, Israel and Russia, 1991–2000: the Kurdish and Islamist questions. California: Mazda Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, R., 1986. Public papers of the presidents of the United States, Book 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sezgin, Y., 2002. The October 1998 crisis in Turkish-Syrian relations: a prospect theory approach. Turkish Studies, 3 (2), 44–68.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, R.C., 1955. Toward greater order in the study of international politics. World Politics, 7 (3), 461–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprout, H. and Sprout, M., 1956. Man-Milieu relationship hypotheses in the context of international politics. New Jersey: Center of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• State sponsors of terrorism. U.S. Department of State. Available from https://www.state.gov/j/ct/list/c14151.htm [Accessed 4 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S., 1991. An eclectic aproach. In: C.N. Murphy and R. Tooze, eds. The new international political economy. Boulder: Macmillan, 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• TBMM Tutanak Dergisi [TGNA Minutes Journal], 07.October.1998.
   Google Scholar
• The correlates of war project national material capabilities (v5.0). Composite Index of National Capability, Available from: http://cow.dss.ucdavis.edu/data-sets/national-material-capabilities [Accessed 4 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly A/RES/49/60, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly A/RES/50/6, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly A/RES/51/210, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly A/RES/52/165, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N., 1979. Theory of international politics. London: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. Trans. By A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, J., 1996. Constructing national interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2 (3), 275–318.
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, J., 1999. Constructing national interests: the United States and the Cuban Missile crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A., 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfers, A., 1951. The pole of power and the pole of indifference. World Politics, 4 (1), 39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfers, A., 1962. Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yetkin, M., 2004. Kürt Kapanı: Şam’dan İmralı’ya Öcalan [Kurdish Snare: ocalan from Damascus to Imrali]. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Zisser, E., 1999. Syria: the renewed struggle for power. In: M. Ma’oz, J. Ginat, and O. Winckler, eds. Modern Syria: from Ottoman rule to pivotal role in the middle east. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zisser, E., 2000a. Will Bashshar al-Asad rule? Middle East Quarterly, 7 (3), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zisser, E., 2000b. Clues to the Syrian puzzle. The Washington Quarterly, 23 (2), 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisser, E., 2001. Asad’s legacy: Syria in transition. London: C. Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Zisser, E., 2003. Syria and the United States: bad habits die hard. Middle East Quarterly, 10 (3), 29–37.
   Google Scholar